Improving Diet Quality of Community-Dwelling Seniors Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach

October 3, 2026 updated by: Zoe Lim, Geriatric Education and Research Institute

This study implements a community co-designed educational intervention program to improve diet quality of community-dwelling seniors.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 768024
        • Geriatric Education & Research Institute, Yishun Community Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Senior Participants):

  • aged 60 years and above
  • have at least one social risk factor as assessed by community-based providers, based on criteria defined by Singapore's Agency for Integrated Care
  • able to understand and provide consent

Inclusion Criteria (Center Staff and Volunteers):

  • aged 21 years and above,
  • Active Ageing Centre (AAC) staff member, micro-jobber or volunteer
  • able to understand and provide consent.

Exclusion Criteria (Senior Participants):

  • living with helpers
  • require diet with modified consistencies due to swallowing impairment
  • moderate-severe dementia
  • multiple or severe food allergies
  • Stages 3, 4 or 5 Chronic kidney disease (CKD), or other medical conditions deemed unsuitable for participation
  • concurrently participating in other nutrition and food literacy programmes, and
  • unable to converse in English or Chinese

Exclusion Criteria (Center Staff and Volunteers):

  • require diet with modified consistencies due to swallowing impairment
  • moderate-severe dementia
  • multiple or severe food allergies
  • Stages 3, 4 or 5 Chronic kidney disease (CKD), or other medical conditions deemed unsuitable for participation
  • concurrently participating in other nutrition and food literacy programmes, and
  • unable to converse in English or Chinese

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

This is a single-arm trial and so all participants will be in the intervention arm.

The intervention is a food literacy workshop comprising 4 sessions held once every 2 weeks, up to 3 hours each. The main workshop themes are: 1) Practical ways to prepare simple and healthy meals; and 2) Basic nutrition knowledge related to the meals prepared, such as their nutrient components, links to chronic conditions and short/long-term health effects. These sessions include hands-on food preparation, tasting sessions, talks, group discussions and/or question and answer. Hands-on food preparation will focus on 'no-equipment' or 'light cooking' recipes. Food tasting involves everyday ingredients such as fruits, vegetables, proteins, nuts, seeds, spices, grains, and condiments. Group discussions will be facilitated by a study team member and will revolve around the specific themes of the workshop delivered on that day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS)
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

A questionnaire that captures all foods consumed by the individual respondent during a 24-hour reference period and classifies foods into their corresponding GDQS food groups. The overall GDQS score sums up points across food groups, totaling a possible range of 0-49. Higher scores denote better diet quality.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge and Literacy
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Knowledge regarding health eating self-rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores denote better self-rated knowledge

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Behavior Change
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Self-selected factors influencing food choice and frequency of snacking behavior.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Adapted Nutrition Literacy Quiz
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

A quiz that assesses the participant's nutrition literacy.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Adapted Food Literacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

A scenario-based assessment that tests the participant's food literacy across 4 domains: Planning, Selection, Preparation, and Eating. Each correct answer will be given one score, totaling a possible range of 0-4.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Brief Pittsburgh' Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Subjective sleep quality is rated from 0 (very bad) to 3 (very good). Sleep duration is rated from < 5 hours (severe sleep deprivation) to > 7 hours (standard healthy recommendations).

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Visual Analog Scales (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Three domains (feelings of Stomach discomfort, Energy, and Mood) self-rated on a 0-10 VAS. Higher scores denote less stomach discomfort, better energy or better mood.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m), a measure of obesity and overweightness.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Participants are timed as they rose from a chair, walked 3-metres to-and-fro, and sat back down on the chair. A measure of physical function and performance.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-Item Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

A 3-item questionnaire that assesses an individual's subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Higher scores denote more loneliness. A score of 6-9 out of 9 indicated loneliness

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6)
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

A 6-item validated instrument designed to measures the size, closeness, and frequency of a person's social interactions with family and friends. Possible range of scores is from 0 to 30. A score of <12 out of 30 indicated poor social network score, or at risk of social isolation.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

A health-related quality of life questionnaire based on five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) across five levels. An index score will be computed based on specific country's value set, where max score is 1.000 (perfect health) and min score could be a negative value (health state that is "worse than dead"). Based on the official Singapore EQ-5D-5L value set, the index scores range from 1.000 down to -0.851. Visual-analogue scale score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores denoting better self-rated health.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Program Satisfaction
Time Frame: End of 8-week intervention.

Overall satisfaction with intervention program rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher point denotes better satisfaction.

End of 8-week intervention.
Self-Efficacy of Health Messages Delivery
Time Frame: Baseline to end of 8 weeks.

Confidence in delivering health and nutrition-related messages, rated on 5-point Likert scale.

Baseline to end of 8 weeks.
Adapted Trust in the Community Health Worker Scale
Time Frame: End of 8 weeks

An adapted validated scale to measure participant's trust in the trainers. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores are calculated as a mean of non-missing items, with possible range of score from 1.0 to 4.0. Higher scores denote higher trust.

End of 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-0092

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Ethics approval limits data use to the original study team, thus consent does not cover data sharing.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe