Gait Stability After Stroke (AdaptGait)

Influence of Added Tasks and Different Environmental Conditions on Gait Stability After Stroke

The study will investigate gait stability in individuals post-stroke compared with age- and sex-matched healthy adults. Participants will undergo laboratory-based walking assessments under different environmental conditions, including level walking, uphill and downhill walking, and unexpected slip perturbations, with and without added cognitive, postural, and load-carrying tasks. The primary outcome measures will be the Margin of Stability (MOS), step width, and step width variability.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

: The study will recruit 20-30 adults post-stroke and an equal number of healthy controls. Participants post-stroke will be recruited after discharge from their regular rehabilitation. Participants will complete a single assessment session involving walking on a instrumented dual-belt treadmill mounted on a Stewart platform while secured with a safety harness. Walking conditions will include level, inclined, declined, and slip-perturbed walking, as well as walking combined with serial subtraction, head turning, or backpack carrying. Three-dimensional motion capture, force measurements, and surface electromyography will be used to quantify gait biomechanics and neuromuscular responses. The effects of environmental conditions and added tasks on gait stability, balance control, and fall risk will be compared between groups to identify biomechanical and neuromuscular markers associated with increased fall susceptibility after stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria - stroke group:

  • Discharge from regular rehabilitation
  • First unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke affecting one of the cerebral hemispheres
  • More than 3 months post-stroke
  • Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥24 or cognitive ability to participate in the study
  • Ability to walk independently in the community without a walking aid
  • Moderate to mild balance impairment (Mini-BESTest score 16-25)
  • Sufficient cognitive and physical ability to participate
  • Ability to walk on a treadmill in intervals for up to 30 altogether

Inclusion Criteria - healthy control group:

  • Age- and sex-matched to participants with stroke
  • Mini-BESTest score ≥ 16
  • Sufficient cognitive and physical ability to participate
  • Ability to walk on a treadmill in intervals for up to 30 altogether

Exclusion Criteria (both groups):

  • Musculoskeletal impairments affecting gait or balance
  • Severe cardiovascular disease or heart failure (NYHA Class III-IV)
  • Other neurological disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Post-stroke patients

Adults with unilateral stroke (>3 months post-stroke) will undergo assessment of gait stability and balance responses during treadmill walking under different environmental conditions (level, uphill, downhill, and slip-perturbed walking) and added tasks (serial subtraction, head turning, and backpack carrying).

Level treadmill walking

Uphill treadmill walking

Downhill treadmill walking

Slip-perturbed treadmill walking

Added task: serial subtraction

Added task: head turning

Added task: backpack carrying

Active Comparator: Control group: healthy control participants

Age- and sex-matched healthy adults will undergo the same assessment protocol as the post-stroke patients, i.e., assessment of gait stability and balance responses during treadmill walking under different environmental conditions (level, uphill, downhill, and slip-perturbed walking) and added tasks (serial subtraction, head turning, and backpack carrying).

Level treadmill walking

Uphill treadmill walking

Downhill treadmill walking

Slip-perturbed treadmill walking

Added task: serial subtraction

Added task: head turning

Added task: backpack carrying

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Margin of Stability (MOS)
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Margin of stability in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions calculated from kinematic and kinetic gait data during walking under different environmental conditions and added tasks, expressed in cm (more is better)

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Step Width
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Mean step width measured during walking under different environmental conditions and added tasks, expressed in cm (less is better)

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Step Width Variability
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Variability of step width calculated across consecutive gait cycles during walking under different environmental conditions and added tasks, , expressed as coeffcient of variation (less is better)

During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spatiotemporal Gait Parameter 1: Cadence
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Gait cadence (in steps/min; less is better) measured using the instrumented treadmill

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Spatiotemporal Gait Parameter 2: Step Length
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Gait step length (in cm, more is better) measured using the instrumented treadmill

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Spatiotemporal Gait Parameter 3: Stance Time
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Gait stance time (in s, less is better) measured using the instrumented treadmill

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Spatiotemporal Gait Parameter 4: Swing Time
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Gait swing time (in cm, more is better) measured using the instrumented treadmill

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Kinetic Variable 1: Ground Reaction Force
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Ground reaction force in antero-posterior direction (in N; less is better) measured using the instrumented treadmill

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Kinetic Variable 2: Center-of-pressure Movement
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Center-of-pressure movement in antero-posterior and medio-lateral direction (in cm; less is better) measured using the instrumented treadmill

During the intervention (periprocedurally)
Kinetic Variable 3: Velocity
Time Frame: During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Velocity in antero-posterior and medio-lateral direction (in cm/s; smaller is better) measured using the instrumented treadmill

During the intervention (periprocedurally)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Metka Močilar, MSc PT, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
  • Study Director: Urška Puh, PT, PhD, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe