- ICH GCP
- Registr klinických studií v USA
- Klinická studie NCT07721077
Effects of Velocity-based Training on Physical Fitness and Skills Performance Among Aerobic Gymnast Athletes in Henan, China
19. července 2026 aktualizováno: Ma Kui
The main objective of this study is to examine the effect of 8 weeks of Velocity-based training on physical fitness and aerobic gymnastics skills performance among college aerobic gymnastics athletes in Henan, China
- To examine the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2 on selected fitness components in terms of power, strength, speed, agility, balance, endurance, coordination, and flexibility among aerobic gymnast athletes in Henan, China.
- To evaluate the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1 and posttest 2 on selected parameters of gymnast athletes skills in Group A Floor Elements (Family 1 Dynamic Strength: A-Frame, Family 2 Static Strength: Support, Family 3 Leg Circle: Helicopter), Group B Airborne Elements (Family 4 Dynamic Jump: Air Turn, Family 5 Form Jump: Cossack, Family 6 Split Leap: Switch Split ), and Group C Stanning Elements(Family Turns: Turn) of aerobic gymnasts from Henan, China.
- To examine the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2 on the skills performance of aerobic gymnasts in terms of scoring routines.
Přehled studie
Postavení
Dokončeno
Typ studie
Intervenční
Zápis (Aktuální)
60
Fáze
- Nelze použít
Kontakty a umístění
Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.
Studijní místa
-
-
Henan
-
Zhengzhou, Henan, Čína, 450000
- Velocity-based training
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
- Dospělý
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Ano
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- College aerobics athletes.
- Participants must have received at least one year of training in a Henan provincial college training team and be a formal aerobic gymnast in a Shandong provincial college.
- Participants must have participated in the Henan provincial aerobic gymnastics national team selection competition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants have high levels of asymmetry due to congenital physical dysplasia (Smith, 2020).
- History of sports injuries within the past year and continuous treatment.
- Participants who cannot complete the entire experimental training due to participating in the professional competition schedule.
Studijní plán
Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Základní věda
- Přidělení: Randomizované
- Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
- Maskování: Dvojnásobek
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / Léčba |
|---|---|
|
Experimentální: Velocity-Based Training Group
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week velocity-based resistance training (VBT) intervention, in which training loads were prescribed and adjusted in real time according to movement velocity feedback.
|
Velocity-based training (VBT) is a resistance training method in which training loads are prescribed and adjusted in real time based on movement velocity feedback (kinematic outcomes).
Ostatní jména:
|
|
Aktivní komparátor: Control Training Group
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week conventional (percentage-based) resistance training intervention following standard training protocols without velocity monitoring.
|
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week conventional (percentage-based) resistance training program following the athletes' standard training schedule, without velocity monitoring or feedback.
Ostatní jména:
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Strength: One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press and Back Squat
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Maximal upper-body strength (1RM bench press) and lower-body strength (1RM back squat) were each assessed using standardised one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing protocols.
Values are reported separately for bench press and back squat, both in kilograms (kg).
Higher values indicate greater maximal strength.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Power: Standing Long Jump Distance
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Power was assessed using the standing long jump (SLJ) test, measured as horizontal jump distance in centimetres (cm) using a tape measure.
Higher values indicate greater lower-body power.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Speed: 30-Metre Sprint Time
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Linear sprinting speed was assessed using a 30-metre sprint test, timed with a stopwatch and recorded in seconds (s).
Lower values indicate faster sprint speed (better performance).
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Agility: Illinois Agility Test Time
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Change-of-direction agility was assessed using the Illinois Agility Test (IAT), timed with a stopwatch and recorded in seconds (s).
Lower values indicate better agility performance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Endurance: Trunk Flexor Test Time
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Endurance was assessed using the Trunk Flexor Test (TFT), a timed isometric hold test recorded in seconds (s) using a stopwatch.
Higher values indicate greater muscular endurance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Balance: Y-Balance Test Composite Reach Distance
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Dynamic balance was assessed using the Y-Balance Test (YBT), with composite reach distance measured in centimetres (cm) using the Y-Balance Test instrument.
Higher values indicate better dynamic balance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Coordination: Wall-Toss Test Successful Catches
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Upper-limb neuromuscular coordination was assessed using the Wall-Toss Test (WTT), recorded as the number of successful ball catches completed within a fixed 30-second trial.
Higher values indicate better coordination.
Note: this measure is a count of catches, not a time-based measurement.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Flexibility: Sit-and-Reach Distance
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Flexibility was assessed using the Sit-and-Reach (SAR) test, measured in centimetres (cm) using a sit-and-reach box.
Higher values indicate greater flexibility.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Dynamic Strength (Explosive A-Frame)
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 1 Dynamic Strength difficulty element (Explosive A-Frame) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Static Strength (Straddle Planche)
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 2 Static Strength difficulty element (Straddle Planche) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Leg Circle (Helicopter)
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 3 Leg Circle difficulty element (Helicopter) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Dynamic Jump (Scale Twist)
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 4 Dynamic Jump difficulty element (Scale Twist) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Form Jump (Cossack Jump)
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 5 Form Jump difficulty element (Cossack Jump) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Split Leap (Scissors Leap Turn)
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 6 Split Leap difficulty element (Scissors Leap Turn) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Turn (Double Illusion)
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Execution of the Family 7 Turn difficulty element (Double Illusion) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points.
Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
|
Aerobic Gymnastics Overall Routine Score
Časové okno: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Overall competitive routine performance was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), combining Difficulty (D-Score), Execution (E-Score), and Artistry (A-Score) components.
Total score is reported in points with no fixed upper bound; higher scores indicate better overall routine performance.
|
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.
Sponzor
Spolupracovníci
Termíny studijních záznamů
Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Aktuální)
1. dubna 2026
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
20. června 2026
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
15. července 2026
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
6. července 2026
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
19. července 2026
První zveřejněno (Aktuální)
22. července 2026
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
22. července 2026
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
19. července 2026
Naposledy ověřeno
1. července 2026
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Další identifikační čísla studie
- 20250908
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Ne
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
Ne
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .
Klinické studie na Výcvik
-
Riphah International UniversityDokončeno
-
Methodist Health SystemDokončenoMock Code Training SimulationSpojené státy
-
York St John UniversityYork City Baths ClubAktivní, ne náborPlavání | Protokoly cvičení Power Training | Efekty silového tréninkuSpojené království
-
University of ThessalyUkončenoProtokoly cvičení Power TrainingŘecko
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityNáborParkinsonova choroba | Virtuální realita | Pohlcující virtuální realita | Akce Obervation Training | 3D nahráváníTurecko (Türkiye)