Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Effects of Velocity-based Training on Physical Fitness and Skills Performance Among Aerobic Gymnast Athletes in Henan, China

19. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Ma Kui

The main objective of this study is to examine the effect of 8 weeks of Velocity-based training on physical fitness and aerobic gymnastics skills performance among college aerobic gymnastics athletes in Henan, China

  1. To examine the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2 on selected fitness components in terms of power, strength, speed, agility, balance, endurance, coordination, and flexibility among aerobic gymnast athletes in Henan, China.
  2. To evaluate the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1 and posttest 2 on selected parameters of gymnast athletes skills in Group A Floor Elements (Family 1 Dynamic Strength: A-Frame, Family 2 Static Strength: Support, Family 3 Leg Circle: Helicopter), Group B Airborne Elements (Family 4 Dynamic Jump: Air Turn, Family 5 Form Jump: Cossack, Family 6 Split Leap: Switch Split ), and Group C Stanning Elements(Family Turns: Turn) of aerobic gymnasts from Henan, China.
  3. To examine the effects of Velocity-based training across pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2 on the skills performance of aerobic gymnasts in terms of scoring routines.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

60

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • China
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000
        • Velocity-based training

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. College aerobics athletes.
  2. Participants must have received at least one year of training in a Henan provincial college training team and be a formal aerobic gymnast in a Shandong provincial college.
  3. Participants must have participated in the Henan provincial aerobic gymnastics national team selection competition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants have high levels of asymmetry due to congenital physical dysplasia (Smith, 2020).
  2. History of sports injuries within the past year and continuous treatment.
  3. Participants who cannot complete the entire experimental training due to participating in the professional competition schedule.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Grundlegende Wissenschaft
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Velocity-Based Training Group
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week velocity-based resistance training (VBT) intervention, in which training loads were prescribed and adjusted in real time according to movement velocity feedback.
Verhalten: Velocity-Based Training (VBT)
Velocity-based training (VBT) is a resistance training method in which training loads are prescribed and adjusted in real time based on movement velocity feedback (kinematic outcomes).
Andere Namen:
  • VBT
Aktiver Komparator: Control Training Group
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week conventional (percentage-based) resistance training intervention following standard training protocols without velocity monitoring.
Verhalten: Conventional Resistance Training
Thirty university aerobic gymnasts underwent an 8-week conventional (percentage-based) resistance training program following the athletes' standard training schedule, without velocity monitoring or feedback.
Andere Namen:
  • Conventional Training / Percentage-Based Training

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Strength: One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press and Back Squat
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Maximal upper-body strength (1RM bench press) and lower-body strength (1RM back squat) were each assessed using standardised one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing protocols. Values are reported separately for bench press and back squat, both in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater maximal strength.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Power: Standing Long Jump Distance
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Power was assessed using the standing long jump (SLJ) test, measured as horizontal jump distance in centimetres (cm) using a tape measure. Higher values indicate greater lower-body power.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Speed: 30-Metre Sprint Time
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Linear sprinting speed was assessed using a 30-metre sprint test, timed with a stopwatch and recorded in seconds (s). Lower values indicate faster sprint speed (better performance).
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Agility: Illinois Agility Test Time
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Change-of-direction agility was assessed using the Illinois Agility Test (IAT), timed with a stopwatch and recorded in seconds (s). Lower values indicate better agility performance.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Endurance: Trunk Flexor Test Time
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Endurance was assessed using the Trunk Flexor Test (TFT), a timed isometric hold test recorded in seconds (s) using a stopwatch. Higher values indicate greater muscular endurance.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Balance: Y-Balance Test Composite Reach Distance
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Dynamic balance was assessed using the Y-Balance Test (YBT), with composite reach distance measured in centimetres (cm) using the Y-Balance Test instrument. Higher values indicate better dynamic balance.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Coordination: Wall-Toss Test Successful Catches
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Upper-limb neuromuscular coordination was assessed using the Wall-Toss Test (WTT), recorded as the number of successful ball catches completed within a fixed 30-second trial. Higher values indicate better coordination. Note: this measure is a count of catches, not a time-based measurement.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Flexibility: Sit-and-Reach Distance
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Flexibility was assessed using the Sit-and-Reach (SAR) test, measured in centimetres (cm) using a sit-and-reach box. Higher values indicate greater flexibility.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Dynamic Strength (Explosive A-Frame)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Execution of the Family 1 Dynamic Strength difficulty element (Explosive A-Frame) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Static Strength (Straddle Planche)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Execution of the Family 2 Static Strength difficulty element (Straddle Planche) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Leg Circle (Helicopter)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Execution of the Family 3 Leg Circle difficulty element (Helicopter) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Dynamic Jump (Scale Twist)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Execution of the Family 4 Dynamic Jump difficulty element (Scale Twist) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Form Jump (Cossack Jump)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Execution of the Family 5 Form Jump difficulty element (Cossack Jump) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Split Leap (Scissors Leap Turn)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Execution of the Family 6 Split Leap difficulty element (Scissors Leap Turn) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Skill Score: Turn (Double Illusion)
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Execution of the Family 7 Turn difficulty element (Double Illusion) was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), on a scale of 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate better technical execution.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Aerobic Gymnastics Overall Routine Score
Zeitfenster: Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.
Overall competitive routine performance was scored by certified judges according to the FIG Aerobic Gymnastics Code of Points (2025), combining Difficulty (D-Score), Execution (E-Score), and Artistry (A-Score) components. Total score is reported in points with no fixed upper bound; higher scores indicate better overall routine performance.
Assessed at baseline (Week 0), Week 4, and Week 8 of the 8-week training intervention.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ma Kui

Mitarbeiter

Qufu Normal University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

20. Juni 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. Juli 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

6. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

19. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

19. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 20250908

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Ausbildung

Klinische Studien zur Velocity-Based Training (VBT)

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Uzbekistan

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren