Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Secondary Prevention of Osteoporosis

22. januar 2020 opdateret af: Sarah Berry, Hebrew SeniorLife

Secondary Prevention of Osteoporosis: A Window of Opportunity in the Acute Rehabilitation Setting

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement an evidence based protocol for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures and falls, and to determine how compliance with this intervention improves muscle strength and functional status following a fracture.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Following a fracture, few persons are screened or treated for osteoporosis (Feldstein et al). It is not surprising, then, that the risk of future osteoporotic fractures remains high. Although little data exists on the secondary prevention of osteoporosis, calcium, vitamin D, and bisphosphonates have all been shown to be effective in the primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, and they are likely beneficial in reducing secondary fractures as well. Targeting falls prevention is another approach that is likely effective in reducing the risk of fracture.

In the U.S., acute rehabilitation (rehab) settings offer a unique environment to initiate osteoporotic therapy. Therefore, this study will develop and implement evidence based interventions for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in the acute rehab setting with the following objectives:

Specific Aim I: Assess overall compliance with pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions initiated in an acute rehab setting following a fragility fracture. Hypothesis: Non-compliant participants are less likely to show improvement in functional status, muscle strength, or vitamin D levels following the intervention.

Specific Aim II: Describe the incidence of fragility fractures and falls in participants at 6-months and one-year following the osteoporotic intervention introduced during acute rehab. Hypothesis: Similar to community based studies, a number of participants will go on to experience repeat falls and resulting fractures within one-year of follow-up. Compliant participants are less likely to experience falls and fractures.

Specific Aim III: Confirm the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in a rehab setting. Describe the relationship between changes in vitamin D levels in participants between baseline and 6-month follow-up and changes in functional outcomes. Hypothesis: There will be a direct association between a change in vitamin D levels and a change in functional status.

Consecutive individuals admitted with the primary or secondary diagnosis of fracture in the rehabilitation unit of Hebrew Rehabilitation Center will be offered enrollment. All participants enrolled will receive the same intervention: calcium, vitamin D, a weekly oral bisphosphonate, and falls prevention interventions. Specific interventions for preventing falls include optimization of visual acuity, a review of medications associated with falls, personalized exercises to improve strength and balance, and a home hazards safety evaluation when indicated.

All participants will have their functional status, muscle strength, and vitamin D level measured at baseline during their rehab stay. At the six-month follow-up, a home visit will be performed for all participants to again assess functional status, muscle strength, vitamin D level, satisfaction with the intervention, and reasons for non-compliance. A history of interim falls and fractures will be collected by telephone interviews, during home nursing visits, and during the exit 6-month visit.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

29

Fase

  • Fase 3

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02131
        • Hebrew SeniorLife

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

65 år og ældre (Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to rehab unit with the primary or secondary diagnosis of fracture
  • English speaking
  • Cognitively able to provide consent or health care proxy available and willing to provide consent
  • Willing to cooperate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologic or periprosthetic fractures
  • Creatinine clearance less than 15ml/minute
  • Severe hypocalcemia
  • Esophageal stricture or achalasia
  • Taking other treatment for osteoporosis besides calcium or vitamin D in the past 6-months
  • History of kidney stones in the past 6-months

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Andet: Treatment for osteoporosis and falls
calcium, vitamin D, a weekly oral bisphosphonate, and falls prevention measures. No comparator group. All participants received the same intervention
alendronate 70mg /cholecalciferol 2800IU orally once weekly
Andre navne:
  • Fosamax Plus D®
calcium carbonate 500mg /cholecalciferol 200IU orally twice daily
Andre navne:
  • Os-Cal with extra D
personalized exercises, home safety evaluation, referral to an eye doctor if needed, review of medications

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Number Adherent With the Intervention
Tidsramme: 6 months
6 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Reasons for Non-willingness to Particiapte and Non-adherence With Intervention
Tidsramme: 6 months
We asked participants who would not participate the primary reason for non-particiaption. We also asked participants who were not adherent with recommendations what the primary reason ws for non-adherence.
6 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Sarah D Berry, MD, MPH, Harvard University, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2007

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. juni 2008

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. juni 2008

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

10. januar 2007

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

11. januar 2007

Først opslået (Skøn)

12. januar 2007

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

5. februar 2020

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

22. januar 2020

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2020

Mere information

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner