- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT07739121
Benchmarking Large Language Models Against Tumour Boards for Oncology Treatment Recommendations (BEACON)
Benchmarking AI for Clinical Oncology decisioNmaking (BEACON): A Prospective, Multicentre, Blinded Evaluation of Frontier Large Language Models Against Multidisciplinary Tumour Board Recommendations in Oncology Treatment Planning
Studieoversigt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
BEACON is a prospective, multicentre, blinded benchmark using automated, criteria-based scoring. It is built on three design decisions that distinguish it from the existing literature: (i) synthetic, standardised cases remove the record-completeness variability that confounds retrospective comparisons and allow the identical input to be given to every board and every model; (ii) two independent tumour boards per localisation let human-human agreement be measured rather than assumed; and (iii) a guideline matrix, locked a priori, provides an objective anchor applied identically to human and model recommendations.
Reference standard. For each case-domain, a guideline matrix (guideline-recommended / acceptable / unsupported options per case-domain; ESMO, NCCN), locked and time-stamped before data collection, is applied identically to boards and models.
Five decision domains. Every recommendation is decomposed into D1 Intent, D2 Surgery, D3 Radiotherapy, D4 Systemic therapy (class + line), and D5 Work-up & biomarkers before any comparison.
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Anslået)
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Jérôme Lambert, MD PhD
- Telefonnummer: +33 0142499742
- E-mail: jerome.lambert@u-paris.fr
Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup
- Navn: Jean-Emmanuel Bibault, MD PhD
- Telefonnummer: +33 01 56 09 34 06
- E-mail: jean-emmanuel.bibault@aphp.fr
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Paris, Frankrig
- Rekruttering
- Hôpital Europeén Georges Pompidou
-
Kontakt:
- Jean-Emmanuel Bibault, MD PhD
- Telefonnummer: +33 01 56 09 28 34
- E-mail: jean-emmanuel.bibault@aphp.fr
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Prøveudtagningsmetode
Studiebefolkning
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Synthetic oncology case within one of the five predefined localisations (breast, lung, urological, digestive, gynaecological).
- Complete structured schema: UICC 8th-edition stage, biomarkers, ECOG performance status, comorbidities and a standardised clinical question.
- A clinically answerable treatment-planning question that is mappable to the locked guideline matrix.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Case outside the five predefined localisations.
- Incomplete, internally inconsistent or ambiguous schema.
- Duplicate or near-duplicate of an existing case in the set.
- Question not resolvable by current guidelines.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
Kohorter og interventioner
Gruppe / kohorte |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Breast cancers
|
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case.
Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6,
Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
|
|
Lung cancers
|
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case.
Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6,
Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
|
|
Urological cancers
|
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case.
Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6,
Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
|
|
Digestive cancers
|
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case.
Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6,
Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
|
|
Gynaecological cancers
|
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case.
Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6,
Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Domain-level performance between LLM recommendations and the locked guidelines.
Tidsramme: Assessed once at central scoring, after data collection (~October 2026)
|
For each recommendation domain and each LLM, proportion of LLM recommendation concordant with locked guidelines
|
Assessed once at central scoring, after data collection (~October 2026)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of recommendations carrying serious harm potential ( LLM and tumour boards)
Tidsramme: Up to October 2026
|
Up to October 2026
|
|
|
Domain-level recommendation concordance between LLM and tumour-boards
Tidsramme: Up to October 2026
|
Each recommendation domain, decomposed into the five decision domains and scored per domain on an ordinal scale (2 = complete concordance; 1 = partial concordance; 0 = discordance).
|
Up to October 2026
|
|
Inter-tumour board domain-level recommendation concordance
Tidsramme: Up to October 2026
|
Agreement between the two independent tumour boards scored per recommendation domain
|
Up to October 2026
|
|
Equipoise rate
Tidsramme: Up to October 2026
|
Proportion of case-domains where the two tumour boards give different categorical recommendations
|
Up to October 2026
|
|
Completeness
Tidsramme: Up to October 2026
|
Proportion of required domains addressed (LLM and tumour boards)
|
Up to October 2026
|
|
Missingness
Tidsramme: Up to October 2026
|
Proportion of critical omissions (LLM and tumour boards)
|
Up to October 2026
|
|
Intensity bias
Tidsramme: Up to October 2026
|
Proportion of recommendation corresponding to over- or under-treatment
|
Up to October 2026
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
- Urogenitale sygdomme
- Genitale sygdomme
- Genitale neoplasmer, mandlige
- Urogenitale neoplasmer
- Neoplasmer efter sted
- Kønssygdomme, mandlige
- Prostatasygdomme
- Mandlige urogenitale sygdomme
- Nyresygdomme
- Urologiske sygdomme
- Urogenitale sygdomme hos kvinder
- Kvinders urogenitale sygdomme og graviditetskomplikationer
- Luftvejssygdomme
- Sygdomme i fordøjelsessystemet
- Lungesygdomme
- Neoplasmer i luftvejene
- Thoracale neoplasmer
- Hudsygdomme
- Brystsygdomme
- Urinblæresygdomme
- Hud- og bindevævssygdomme
- Neoplasmer
- Prostatiske neoplasmer
- Lungeneoplasmer
- Brystneoplasmer
- Urinblære neoplasmer
- Urologiske neoplasmer
- Nyre-neoplasmer
- Neoplasmer i fordøjelsessystemet
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- APHP261032
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .