Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Benchmarking Large Language Models Against Tumour Boards for Oncology Treatment Recommendations (BEACON)

28 juli 2026 uppdaterad av: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Benchmarking AI for Clinical Oncology decisioNmaking (BEACON): A Prospective, Multicentre, Blinded Evaluation of Frontier Large Language Models Against Multidisciplinary Tumour Board Recommendations in Oncology Treatment Planning

BEACON (Benchmarking AI for Clinical Oncology decisioNmaking) is a prospective, multicentre, comparative, blinded, non-interventional benchmark evaluating the treatment recommendations of five frontier large language models (LLMs) against the recommendations of multidisciplinary tumour boards (RCP) in oncology treatment planning. One hundred standardised synthetic cases (20 per localisation, across breast, lung, urological, digestive and gynaecological cancers) are submitted as identical structured input to two independent tumour boards per localisation and to five frontier LLMs. Each recommendation - human or model - is decomposed into five predefined decision domains (intent, surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, work-up and biomarkers) and scored 0/1/2 for concordance against a two-tier reference: the consensus of the two tumour boards, complemented by an a priori locked guideline matrix (ESMO, NCCN). The primary endpoint is domain-level concordance between LLM and RCP consensus, expressed as a linearly weighted Cohen's kappa. A co-primary safety endpoint captures the proportion of recommendations carrying serious harm potential, because concordance alone can conceal dangerous errors. Because expert boards may disagree with one another on identical cases, model performance is always interpreted against the human consensus. BEACON is designed as reusable, openly licensed, pre-registered infrastructure: all synthetic cases, evaluation rubrics, the locked guideline matrix, scoring algorithms and verbatim prompts are released for full reproducibility.

Studieöversikt

Detaljerad beskrivning

BEACON is a prospective, multicentre, blinded benchmark using automated, criteria-based scoring. It is built on three design decisions that distinguish it from the existing literature: (i) synthetic, standardised cases remove the record-completeness variability that confounds retrospective comparisons and allow the identical input to be given to every board and every model; (ii) two independent tumour boards per localisation let human-human agreement be measured rather than assumed; and (iii) a guideline matrix, locked a priori, provides an objective anchor applied identically to human and model recommendations.

Reference standard. For each case-domain, a guideline matrix (guideline-recommended / acceptable / unsupported options per case-domain; ESMO, NCCN), locked and time-stamped before data collection, is applied identically to boards and models.

Five decision domains. Every recommendation is decomposed into D1 Intent, D2 Surgery, D3 Radiotherapy, D4 Systemic therapy (class + line), and D5 Work-up & biomarkers before any comparison.

Studietyp

Observationell

Inskrivning (Beräknad)

100

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studiekontakt

Studera Kontakt Backup

Studieorter

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Vuxen
  • Äldre vuxen

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Testmetod

Icke-sannolikhetsprov

Studera befolkning

100 synthetic oncology treatment-planning cases (20 per localisation) across five localisations: breast, lung, urological (prostate, bladder / upper-tract urothelial, kidney), digestive and gynaecological. Each case is a structured JSON input specifying UICC 8th-edition stage, biomarkers, ECOG performance status, comorbidities and a standardised clinical question. No human participants, no patient data and no identifiable individuals. Recommendations are produced by two independent tumour boards per localisation and by five frontier LLMs (queried May 2026).

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Synthetic oncology case within one of the five predefined localisations (breast, lung, urological, digestive, gynaecological).
  • Complete structured schema: UICC 8th-edition stage, biomarkers, ECOG performance status, comorbidities and a standardised clinical question.
  • A clinically answerable treatment-planning question that is mappable to the locked guideline matrix.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Case outside the five predefined localisations.
  • Incomplete, internally inconsistent or ambiguous schema.
  • Duplicate or near-duplicate of an existing case in the set.
  • Question not resolvable by current guidelines.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

Kohorter och interventioner

Grupp / Kohort
Intervention / Behandling
Breast cancers
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case. Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
Lung cancers
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case. Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
Urological cancers
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case. Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
Digestive cancers
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case. Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.
Gynaecological cancers
Two independent tumour boards per localisation (10 boards in total) issue a categorical recommendation for every synthetic case. Where both boards agree, their consensus defines the reference standard; where they differ, the case-domain is classified as EQUIPOISE and analysed separately.
Five frontier LLMs (GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro, Llama 4 Maverick) each receive the identical structured input for every case, three times in independent sessions, under locked prompts, versions and settings.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Domain-level performance between LLM recommendations and the locked guidelines.
Tidsram: Assessed once at central scoring, after data collection (~October 2026)
For each recommendation domain and each LLM, proportion of LLM recommendation concordant with locked guidelines
Assessed once at central scoring, after data collection (~October 2026)

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Proportion of recommendations carrying serious harm potential ( LLM and tumour boards)
Tidsram: Up to October 2026
Up to October 2026
Domain-level recommendation concordance between LLM and tumour-boards
Tidsram: Up to October 2026
Each recommendation domain, decomposed into the five decision domains and scored per domain on an ordinal scale (2 = complete concordance; 1 = partial concordance; 0 = discordance).
Up to October 2026
Inter-tumour board domain-level recommendation concordance
Tidsram: Up to October 2026
Agreement between the two independent tumour boards scored per recommendation domain
Up to October 2026
Equipoise rate
Tidsram: Up to October 2026
Proportion of case-domains where the two tumour boards give different categorical recommendations
Up to October 2026
Completeness
Tidsram: Up to October 2026
Proportion of required domains addressed (LLM and tumour boards)
Up to October 2026
Missingness
Tidsram: Up to October 2026
Proportion of critical omissions (LLM and tumour boards)
Up to October 2026
Intensity bias
Tidsram: Up to October 2026
Proportion of recommendation corresponding to over- or under-treatment
Up to October 2026

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

1 maj 2026

Primärt slutförande (Beräknad)

1 oktober 2026

Avslutad studie (Beräknad)

1 oktober 2026

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

28 juli 2026

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

28 juli 2026

Första postat (Faktisk)

31 juli 2026

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

31 juli 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

28 juli 2026

Senast verifierad

1 juli 2026

Mer information

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera