Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Improving Negative Symptoms & Community Engagement in Veterans With Schizophrenia

21. Juni 2021 aktualisiert von: VA Office of Research and Development
The goal of this project is to evaluate an innovative psychosocial intervention package that will incorporate evidence-based treatment strategies to target the affective-motivational deficits, negative expectancies, and behavioral skills deficits that are central to the maintenance of negative symptoms. The intervention - called EnCoRE (Engaging in Community Roles and Experiences) - will include strategies aimed at teaching Veterans with schizophrenia and negative symptoms ways to (1) overcome deficits in anticipatory pleasure, (2) increase intrinsic motivation for goal-directed activities, (3) reduce expectancies for failure, and (4) perform skillfully in new social situations, all of which can impact implementation of new skills and behaviors. Rather than develop a new set of intervention strategies, the investigators will include within EnCoRE evidence-based strategies for these treatment domains. In addition, the investigators will collect qualitative information both from Veterans concerning their perceptions of the strengths, weaknesses, and barriers to participation in EnCoRE, as well as from a sample of mental health providers who work with Veterans with schizophrenia and negative symptoms, in order to inform a larger scale implementation trial should EnCoRE prove effective here.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The goal of this study is to evaluate an innovative psychosocial intervention package that will incorporate evidence-based treatment strategies to target the affective-motivational deficits, negative expectancies, and behavioral skills deficits that are central to the maintenance of negative symptoms. The intervention - called EnCoRE (Engaging in Community Roles and Experiences) - will include strategies aimed at teaching Veterans with schizophrenia and negative symptoms ways to (1) overcome deficits in anticipatory pleasure, (2) increase intrinsic motivation for goal-directed activities, (3) reduce expectancies for failure, and (4) perform skillfully in new social situations, all of which can impact implementation of new skills and behaviors. Rather than develop a new set of intervention strategies, the investigators will include within EnCoRE evidence-based strategies for these treatment domains. In addition, the investigators will collect qualitative information both from Veterans concerning their perceptions of the strengths, weaknesses, and barriers to participation in EnCoRE, as well as from a sample of mental health providers who work with Veterans with schizophrenia and negative symptoms, in order to inform a larger scale implementation trial should EnCoRE prove effective here.

Following a short pilot to train interventionists and refine the manual, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of EnCoRE in improving ratings of negative symptoms, functional outcomes, and engagement in community activities in a sample of Veterans with schizophrenia and negative symptoms (n=108). Participants will be randomized either to EnCoRE or a health-related control group. These goals fit well within the objectives of the Rehabilitation Research and Development (RR&D) program of funding research aimed at studying rehabilitation interventions focused on maximizing functional recovery and assisting in the integration of Veterans into civilian life. Specifically, the investigators will address the following Specific Aims:

Specific Aim 1: Train therapists and refine the EnCoRE manual in a preliminary trial with 10 Veterans with schizophrenia and negative symptoms.

Specific Aim 2: Conduct a randomized controlled trial (n=108, medium effect, alpha=.05) to test the efficacy of EnCoRE in producing positive changes at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up on the primary outcomes of negative symptoms and social and community functioning.

Specific Aim 3: Examine qualitative interviews completed by (1) Veterans who participated in EnCoRE and (2) Mental Health Providers to determine aspects of EnCoRE that were perceived as more or less helpful, interesting, and valuable in order to make adjustments prior to conducting a larger, multi-site implementation trial.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

105

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21201
        • Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 75 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders, 5th edition (DSM 5) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • A minimum average rating of a "moderately severe deficit" (3 or greater on a 0-4 scale) on one symptom domain or a minimum average rating of a "moderate deficit" (2 or greater on a 0-4 scale) on two or more domains, within the affect motivation factor of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) i.e.,:

    • symptoms of asociality
    • avolition
    • anhedonia
  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • Seen by a service provider twice within the last 6 months or once in the last 6 months consistently for two years, as in line with the Veteran's recorded mental health treatment plan (to demonstrate that participants receive ongoing and regular mental health care)
  • Competent to sign Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented history of serious neurological disorder or head trauma with loss of consciousness
  • Cognitive impairment (defined as a total intelligence quotient (IQ) score less than 70 as measured by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading or as indicated by chart review
  • Inability to effectively participate in the baseline assessments due to psychiatric symptoms on two successive appointments
  • Current problematic substance use as indexed by scores on the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test and the Drug Abuse Screening Test
  • Currently meet criteria for a major depressive episode

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Engaging in Community Roles and Experiences (ENCoRE)
Engaging in Community Roles and Experiences (ENCoRE) includes evidence-based psychosocial treatment strategies to target the affective-motivational deficits, negative expectancies, and behavioral skills deficits that are central to the maintenance of negative symptoms. Behavioral strategies include motivational enhancement, psychoeducation, cognitive therapy, and social skills training.
Engaging in Community Roles and Experiences (ENCoRE) includes evidence-based psychosocial treatment strategies to target the affective-motivational deficits, negative expectancies, and behavioral skills deficits that are central to the maintenance of negative symptoms. Behavioral strategies include motivational enhancement, psychoeducation, cognitive therapy, and social skills training.
Andere Namen:
  • ENCoRE
Aktiver Komparator: Health & Wellness (H&W)
Health & Wellness (H&W) will focus on health and wellness issues and education on ways to better manage health-related concerns following a basic structure that includes: review of the previous session's material, new educational content, and discussion/application. Topics will include: 1) Overview, 2) Physical Activity (3 sessions), 3) Nutrition/Healthy Eating (3 sessions), 4) Managing Fatigue/Sleep (3 sessions), 5) Relaxation (3 sessions), 6) Tobacco cessation (3 sessions), 7) Substance Use (3 sessions), 8) Medication/Side Effects (3 sessions), 9) Review (1 session), and Closing (1session).

Health & Wellness (H&W) will focus on health and wellness issues and education on ways to better manage health-related concerns following a basic structure that includes: review of the previous session's material, new educational content, and discussion/application.

Topics will include: 1) Overview, 2) Physical Activity (3 sessions), 3) Nutrition/Healthy Eating (3 sessions), 4) Managing Fatigue/Sleep (3 sessions), 5) Relaxation (3 sessions), 6) Tobacco cessation (3 sessions), 7) Substance Use (3 sessions), 8) Medication/Side Effects (3 sessions), 9) Review (1 session), and Closing (1session).

Andere Namen:
  • H&W

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms Motivation & Pleasure Scale (CAINS MAP) - 12 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Differences in mean change on the CAINS MAP scale from baseline assessment to 12 week assessment. This scale contains a total of 9 items, each with a range of 0-4. Scores range from 0-36. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Social Functioning Scale (SFS) - 12 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Differences in mean change on the SFS from baseline assessment to 12 week assessment. In the present analysis, we used a total score for the SFS including all subscales except the employment subscale. Scores ranged from 13-213. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms Motivation & Pleasure Scale (CAINS MAP) - 24 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed a second time following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Differences in mean change on the CAINS MAP scale from baseline assessment to 24 week assessment. This scale contains a total of 9 items, each with a range of 0-4. Scores range from 0-36. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed a second time following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Social Functioning Scale (SFS) - 24 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed a second time following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Differences in mean change on the SFS from baseline assessment to 24 week assessment. In the present analysis, we used a total score for the SFS including all subscales except the employment subscale. Scores ranged from 13-213. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed a second time following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
University of California San Diego Performance Based Skills Assessment - Brief (UPSA-B) - 12 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Differences in mean change on the UPSA-B from baseline assessment to 12 week assessment. The UPSA-B has a range of 0-100 with higher scores mean a better outcome. In the present analysis, we used the square root of UPSA-B scores with range 0-10.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Maryland Assessment of Recovery Scale (MARS) - 12 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Differences in mean change on the MARS from baseline assessment to 12 week assessment. Scores can range from 25-125. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms Social Motivation and Pleasure Subscale (CAINS SMAP) - 12 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Differences in mean change on the CAINS SMAP from baseline assessment to 12 week assessment. This subscale has a total of 4 items each rated on a 0-4 score. The range of scores was 0-16. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Role Functioning Scale (RFS) - 12 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
Differences in mean change on the RFS from baseline assessment to 12 week assessment. Items are rated on a 1 to 7 scale. In the present analysis, we summed ratings of Family Network Relationships and Immediate Social Network Relationships as our measure of role functioning. Scores can range from 2-14. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 12 weeks
University of California San Diego Performance Based Skills Assessment - Brief (UPSA-B) - 24 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Differences in mean change on the UPSA-B from baseline assessment to 24 week assessment. The UPSA-B has a range of 0-100 with higher scores mean a better outcome. In the present analysis, we used the square root of UPSA-B scores with range 0-10.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Maryland Assessment of Recovery Scale (MARS) - 24 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Differences in mean change on the MARS from baseline assessment to 24 week assessment. Scores can range from 25-125. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms Social Motivation and Pleasure Subscale (CAINS SMAP) - 24 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Differences in mean change on the CAINS SMAP from baseline assessment to 24 week assessment. This subscale has a total of 4 items each rated on a 0-4 score. The range of scores was 0-16. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Role Functioning Scale (RFS) - 24 Weeks
Zeitfenster: Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks
Differences in mean change on the RFS from baseline assessment to 24 week assessment. Items are rated on a 1 to 7 scale. In the present analysis, we summed ratings of Family Network Relationships and Immediate Social Network Relationships as our measure of role functioning. Scores can range from 2-14. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Participants will be assessed following completion of the study intervention, an expected average of 24 weeks

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Melanie E Bennett, Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

3. August 2015

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

27. Mai 2020

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

27. Mai 2020

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

8. Juni 2015

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

8. Juni 2015

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

11. Juni 2015

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

13. Juli 2021

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

21. Juni 2021

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2021

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • D1293-R

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren