Study of Attention and Memory Treatments for Cancer Survivors
30. März 2022 aktualisiert von: University of California, San Francisco
A Pilot Study of A Novel Cognitive Intervention for Cancer Survivors
This clinical trial investigates if certain electronic games may be effective in improving attention and memory function in cancer survivors.
Cancer related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is an issue experienced by many cancer patients/survivors.
CRCI includes perceived or objective problems with memory, executive function, and attention/concentration. CRCI has a negative impact on survivors' ability to work, carry out routine activities, and engage in social and family relationships.
CRCI may result in significant distress and reduced quality of life.
Certain electronic games may help improve attention and memory function in cancer survivors and reduce symptoms of CRCI.
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine the recruitment and retention rates for both arms of this study. II. Determine the effect size for changes in cognitive function (i.e., Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) [i.e. attention], Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation (ACE) [i.e. working memory]) in the intervention group compared to the control group following the 4-week study.
III. Evaluate adherence rates for and satisfaction with the interventions. IV. Evaluate for treatment-related adverse events (e.g., nausea, motion sickness).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine effect sizes for depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, by comparing changes in the intervention group to changes in the control group, following the 4-week study.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients play Endeavor over 25 minutes daily 5 days a week for 4 weeks.
ARM II: Patients play Words! over 25 minutes daily 5 days a week for 4 weeks.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
49
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 94143
- University of California San Francisco
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Attention Function Index (AFI) score of < 7.5
- Are able to read, write, and understand English
- Ability to understand an electronic informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it
- Have a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score of >= 50
- Have access to WiFi connection
Exclusion Criteria:
- Receiving active treatment for cancer recurrence
- Have significant cognitive impairment
- Have sensory or motor deficits that prevent them from doing the assessment and using the application
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Single
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm I (Endeavor)
Patients play Endeavor over 25 minutes daily 5 days a week for 4 weeks.
|
Endeavor application will be utilized by participant on iPad
Andere Namen:
Standardized QOL questionnaire will be administered at each study visit
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Arm II (Words!)
Patients play Words! over 25 minutes daily 5 days a week for 4 weeks.
|
Standardized QOL questionnaire will be administered at each study visit
Words! application will be utilized by participant on iPad
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of participants who completed the study
Zeitfenster: Up to 6 weeks
|
Completion is defined as participants who completed all 4 weeks of intervention and final assessment.
|
Up to 6 weeks
|
|
Mean change in scores on the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) over time
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
The TOVA records responses to visual or auditory stimuli through the participants iPAD, with a unique, highly accurate +/1 millisecond (ms) microswitch.
The TOVA (Copyright 1991- 2021 by The TOVA Company) automatically calculates response time variability (consistency), response time (speed), commissions (impulsivity), and omissions (focus and vigilance).
Results are reported as standard scores (average = 100 with a standard deviation of 15) and are compared to a large normative sample stratified by gender and age.
Scores above 85 are within normal limits, 80-85 are borderline, and below 80 are not within normal limits.
The mean change in scores will be estimated as the norm-based standardized difference in means from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Percent change in scores on the TOVA over time
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
The TOVA records responses to visual or auditory stimuli through the participants iPAD, with a unique, highly accurate +/1 millisecond (ms) microswitch.
The TOVA (Copyright 1991- 2021 by The TOVA Company) automatically calculates response time variability (consistency), response time (speed), commissions (impulsivity), and omissions (focus and vigilance).
Results are reported as standard scores (average = 100 with a standard deviation of 15) and are compared to a large normative sample stratified by gender and age.
Scores above 85 are within normal limits, 80-85 are borderline, and below 80 are not within normal limits.
Will be estimated as the standardized difference between the groups in the percent score change from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Mean changes in Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation (ACE)
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
The ACE is a mobile cognitive control assessment battery containing standard tests that assess different aspects of cognitive control (attention, working memory, and goal management), modified by incorporating adaptive algorithms, immersive graphics, video tutorials, motivating feedback, and a user-friendly interface.
The ACE is administered to all participants via iPad and the scores will be estimated as the standardized difference in means from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Percent change in scores on the ACE over time
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
The ACE is a mobile cognitive control assessment battery containing standard tests that assess different aspects of cognitive control (attention, working memory, and goal management), modified by incorporating adaptive algorithms, immersive graphics, video tutorials, motivating feedback, and a user-friendly interface.
The ACE is administered to all participants via iPad and the scores will be estimated as the standardized difference between the groups in the percent score change from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Proportion of time using application
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
Adherence rate will be evaluated by comparing the amount of time the participant should have used the application to the actual amount of time the participant used the application.
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Percentage of participants who experienced treatment-related adverse events
Zeitfenster: Up to 6 weeks
|
Safety analyses will involve examination of and comparison between groups for the percentage of participants by adverse event severity and type of treatment-related adverse events.
Comparisons of the frequencies between groups will be conducted using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
|
Up to 6 weeks
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in mean severity scores on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D)
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
The CES-D scale is a brief self-report scale designed to measure self-reported symptoms associated with depression experienced in the past week.
Responses are rated on a 5 point Likert scale with response option ranging 0="Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day )" to 4='Most or all of the time (5-7 days)".
The scoring of positive items is reversed.
Possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology and will be estimated as the standardized difference in means of each measure at the last assessment from enrollment to the last assessment.
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Change in mean severity scores on the Lee Fatigue Scale
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
The Lee Fatigue Scale is used to measure the impact of fatigue on a participants quality of life.
The scale consists of 18 items relating to the subjective experience of fatigue.
Each item is rated on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (e.g., from "not at all tired" to "extremely tired").
Scores can range from 0 to 10.
The instrument has two subscales: fatigue (items 1-5 and 11-18) and energy (items 6-10).
The fatigue subscale score is calculated as the mean of the 13 fatigue items and the energy subscale score is the mean of the 5 energy items.
Higher scores on the fatigue subscale represent greater fatigue severity, and higher scores on the energy subscale indicate higher levels of energy and will be estimated as the standardized difference in means of each measure at the last assessment from enrollment to the last assessment.
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Change in severity scores on the General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS)
Zeitfenster: Up to 4 weeks
|
The GSDS consists of 21 items related to frequency in the past month of difficulty getting to sleep when respondents were asked to think about the past month, and each response is on a 8-point Likert scale from 0 ("never") to 7 ("all the time").
Will be estimated as the standardized difference in means of each measure at the last assessment, and as the difference between the groups in the percent change from enrollment to the last assessment.
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Christine Miaskowski, RN, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
1. März 2021
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
31. Januar 2022
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
31. Januar 2022
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
28. April 2021
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
28. April 2021
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
3. Mai 2021
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
8. April 2022
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
30. März 2022
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. März 2022
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 19803
- NCI-2021-02024 (Registrierungskennung: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Nein
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .