Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Cresemba® bei der Behandlung chinesischer Patienten mit IFD, verursacht durch Aspergillus-Arten oder andere Fadenpilze

26. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Pfizer

EINE EINARMIGE, PROSPEKTIVE, MULTIZENTRIERTE STUDIE ZUR BEWERTUNG DER SICHERHEIT UND WIRKSAMKEIT VON ISAVUCONAZOL ZUR PRIMÄRBEHANDLUNG CHINESISCHER PATIENTEN MIT INVASIVER PILZKRANKHEIT (IFD), DIE DURCH ASPERGILLUS-ARTEN ODER ANDERE FADENPILZE VERURSACHT WIRD

Diese Studie ist eine Commitment-Studie nach der Zulassung und soll die Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit von Isavuconazol in einer relativ größeren chinesischen Bevölkerung, die eine Isavuconazol-Behandlung nach der Markteinführung erhalten wird, weiter untersuchen.

Dies ist eine einarmige, prospektive, multizentrische Studie. Diese Studie sucht chinesische Patienten mit nachgewiesener, wahrscheinlicher oder möglicher invasiver Pilzerkrankung (IFD), die durch Aspergillus-Arten oder andere Fadenpilze verursacht wird. Alle Teilnehmer erhalten eine Behandlung mit Isavuconazol. Die längste Behandlungsdauer in dieser Studie beträgt 84 Tage (bis zu 180 Tage für Teilnehmer, bei denen IM diagnostiziert wurde).

Das primäre Ziel ist die Charakterisierung der Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit von Isavuconazol durch Beobachtung der bei der Behandlung auftretenden unerwünschten Ereignisse.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100044
        • Peking University People's Hospital
      • Bengbu, China, 233000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College
      • Shanghai, China, 201800
        • Jiading Central Hospital
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230001
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Anhui Province Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510180
        • Guangzhou First People's Hospital
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510280
        • Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University
      • Jieyang, Guangdong, China, 522095
        • Jieyang People's Hospital
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450003
        • Henan Provincial People's Hospital
    • Shandong
      • Liaocheng, Shandong, China, 252000
        • Liaocheng People's Hospital
      • Zibo, Shandong, China, 255036
        • Zibo central Hospital
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200040
        • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China, 300020
        • Institute of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Einschlusskriterien:

  • nachgewiesene, wahrscheinliche oder mögliche IFD, verursacht durch Aspergillus-Spezies, Mucorales-Spezies oder andere Fadenpilze
  • Körpergewicht > 40 kg beim Screening

Ausschlusskriterien:

  • entweder chronische Aspergillose, Aspergillom oder ABPA
  • Fortgeschrittene HIV-Infektion mit CD4-Zahl < 200 oder Krankheit, die das erworbene Immunschwächesyndrom definiert
  • Personen, die 5 Tage wahrscheinlich nicht überleben, oder Teilnehmer an mechanischer Beatmung
  • schwere Leberfunktionsstörung (Child-Pugh-Klasse C)
  • Familiäres Short-QT-Syndrom
  • Gleichzeitige Anwendung von Efavirenz, Ritonavir, Etravirin, Rifampicin/Rifampin, Rifabutin, Nafcillin, Ketoconazol oder Johanniskraut in den 5 Tagen vor der ersten Verabreichung der Studienintervention

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Isavuconazol
Dies ist eine einarmige Studie, alle eingeschriebenen Teilnehmer erhalten die Studienmedikation.
Arzneimittel: Isavuconazol
Dies ist eine einarmige Studie, alle eingeschriebenen Teilnehmer erhalten die Studienintervention.
Andere Namen:
  • Cresemba®

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A TEAE was an AE that started on or after the first administration of study intervention until 28 days after last dose of study intervention. AEs included both serious (SAE) and all non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs).
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
All-cause Mortality Rate Through Day 42
Zeitfenster: After first dose of study intervention (Day 1) through Day 42
All-cause mortality included any death that occurred after first dose of study drug through Day 42 as following: a) known deaths: any death that occurred after first dose of study intervention through Day 42 and b) unknown deaths: unknown (not actual deaths but the numbers were used in calculating all-cause mortality rate): participant was censored and was included in the reported data for this outcome measure if participant's survival status was missing or the last known alive date was before Day 42. All-cause mortality rate was defined as the percentage of participants with all-cause mortality (known deaths [actual] and unknown deaths [not actual but treated as deaths]) among the overall number of participants analyzed.
After first dose of study intervention (Day 1) through Day 42
All-cause Mortality Rate Through Day 84
Zeitfenster: After first dose of study intervention (Day 1) through Day 84
All-cause mortality included any death that occurred after first dose of study drug through Day 84 as following: a) known deaths: any death that occurred after first dose of study intervention through Day 84 and b) unknown (not actual deaths but the numbers were used in calculating all-cause mortality rate): participant was censored and was included in the reported data for this outcome measure if participant's survival status was missing or the last known alive date was before Day 84. All-cause mortality rate was defined as the percentage of participants with all-cause mortality (known deaths [actual] and unknown deaths [not actual but treated as deaths]) among the overall number of participants analyzed.
After first dose of study intervention (Day 1) through Day 84
Overall Success Rate Based on Investigator's Assessment at Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT): Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 180)
Successful response was based on any one criterion from clinical, radiological or mycological response to be considered to have an overall outcome of success as the following. Criteria for:a)clinical response:1)resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings 2)resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings;b)A success radiological response means:1) greater than equal to(>=) 90 percent (%)improvement from screening,2)>= 50% to less than(<)90% improvement from screening for visits on Day 42, Day 84 and EOT(that is after Day 42), 3)>=25% to <50% improvement from screening (For Day 42 and EOT (that is before Day 180) for participants with proven or probable IFD and at Day 84, this would be considered unsuccessful) and 4) no signs on radiological images at screening (proven IFD only);c)mycological response:1)eradication and 2)presumed eradication. Overall success rate: percentage of participants with overall success at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 180)
Overall Success Rate Based on Investigator's Assessment at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT: Mycological Intent-to-Treat IA (myITT-IA) Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 84)
Successful response was based on any one criterion from clinical, radiological or mycological response to be considered to have an overall outcome of success as the following. Criteria for: a)clinical response:1)resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings 2)resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings; b)A success radiological response means:1) >= 90 percent (%)improvement from screening, 2)>= 50% to < 90% improvement from screening for visits on Day 42, Day 84 and EOT(that is after Day 42), 3)>=25% to <50% improvement from screening (For Day 42 and EOT (that is before Day 84) for participants with proven or probable IFD and at Day 84, this would be considered unsuccessful) and 4) no signs on radiological images at screening (proven IFD only);c) mycological response:1)eradication and 2)presumed eradication. Overall success rate: percentage of participants with overall success at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 84)
Clinical Success Rate at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT: mITT Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 180)
Clinical response was categorized into: success, failure, and not applicable. Clinical success was based on any one of the following criteria: 1) resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and 2) resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and/or physical findings. Assessment was based on investigator's assessment. Clinical success rate: percentage of participants with clinical success at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 180)
Clinical Success Rate at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT: myITT-IA Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 84)
Clinical response was categorized into: success, failure, and not applicable. Clinical success was based on any one of the following criteria: 1) resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and 2) resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and/or physical findings. Assessment was based on investigator's assessment. Clinical success rate: percentage of participants with clinical success among all evaluable participants (excluding assessment not applicable participants) at specified time points. Clinical success rate: percentage of participants with clinical success at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 84)
Mycological Success Rate at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT: mITT Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 180)
Mycological response was categorized into: success, failure, and not applicable. Success mycological response was based on any one of the following criteria: 1) eradication: eradication of the original causative organism cultured or identified by histology/cytology at baseline and 2) presumed eradication: missing documentation of the eradication of the original causative organism at baseline plus resolution of all or some clinical symptoms and physical findings of IFD present at baseline and/or of those that appeared at a subsequent visit. Success rate: percentage of participants with successful mycological response at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 180)
Mycological Success Rate at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT: myITT-IA Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 84)
Mycological response was categorized into: success, failure, and not applicable. Success mycological response was based on any one of the following criteria: 1) eradication: eradication of the original causative organism cultured or identified by histology/cytology at baseline and 2) presumed eradication: missing documentation of the eradication of the original causative organism at baseline plus resolution of all or some clinical symptoms and physical findings of IFD present at baseline and/or of those that appeared at a subsequent visit. Success rate: percentage of participants with successful mycological response at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before or at Day 84)
Radiological Success Rate at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT: mITT Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day or at before Day 180)
Radiological response was categorized into: success, failure, and not applicable. A successful radiological response was based on any one of the following criteria: 1) >=90% improvement from screening, (2) >=50% to <90% improvement from screening for visits on Day 42, Day 84, and EOT (that is after Day 42), (3) >=25% to <50% improvement from screening for Day 42 and EOT (that is before Day 180). Success rate: percentage of participants with successful radiological response at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day or at before Day 180)
Radiological Success Rate at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT: myITT-IA Population
Zeitfenster: Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before Day 84)
Radiological response was categorized into: success, failure, and not applicable. A successful radiological response was based on any one of the following criteria: 1) >=90% improvement from screening, (2) >=50% to <90% improvement from screening for visits on Day 42, Day 84, and EOT (that is after Day 42), (3) >=25% to <50% improvement from screening for Day 42 and EOT (that is before Day 84). Success rate: percentage of participants with successful radiological response at specified time points.
Day 42, Day 84 and EOT (any day before Day 84)
Number of Participants With Treatment Related TEAEs
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A TEAEs was an AE with that started on or after the first administration of study intervention until 28 days after last dose of study intervention. Treatment related TEAEs were TEAEs related to study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-SAEs.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the criteria: resulted in death, is life-threatening, required in-participant hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity and was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. A TEAEs was an AE with that started on or after the first administration of study intervention until 28 days after last dose of study intervention.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Intervention Discontinuation
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A TEAEs was an AE with that started on or after the first administration of study intervention until 28 days after last dose of study intervention. In this outcome measure, number of participants with TEAEs leading to study intervention discontinuation (during study treatment) were reported.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Death
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. A TEAEs was defined as an AE with an onset date on or after the date of informed consent until 28 days after discontinuation of drug. In this outcome measure, number of participants with TEAEs leading to death (during study treatment) were reported.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With Death
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of participants with death due to any cause were reported in this outcome measure.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Clinical laboratory abnormalities test criteria included, a) hematology: hemoglobin with primary criteria of <0.8* lower limit of normal (LLN), erythrocytes <0.8* LLN, platelets <0.5* LLN >1.75* upper limit of normal (ULN), leukocytes < 0.6* LLN and > 1.5* ULN, lymphocytes and neutrophils < 0.8* LLN and > 1.2* ULN. b) Chemistry: bilirubin and direct bilirubin >1.5* ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase >3.0* ULN, urea nitrogen, urea and creatinine >1.3* ULN, sodium <0.95* LLN and potassium<0.9* LLN. c) urinalysis: pH, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin and bilirubin, urobilinogen, nitrite leukocyte esterase >= 1. Number of participants with any laboratory abnormalities were reported in this outcome measure.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Vital signs included systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rate. Clinical significance of vital signs was judged by the investigator.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters as Per Pre-defined Criteria
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Predefined ECG criteria of clinical significance: a) heart rate (beats per minute [bpm]): value <40 and value >120; b) PR interval (millisecond [(msec)]: value>280; c) QRS interval (msec): value>120 d) QTc corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) (msec): value >500 and new prolongation value >480 or increase >= 60. Only those pre-defined ECG categories for which non-zero data were available have been reported below.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Eye Examination
Zeitfenster: From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
The eye examination included visual acuity, confrontational visual field testing and color perception testing. Any abnormality was assessed by a qualified ophthalmologist.
From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention (For Isavuconazole IA group: approximately up to 112 days, for Isavuconazole IM group: approximately up to 208 days)
Plasma Concentration of Isavuconazole at Days 3, 7, 14 and EOT Visit
Zeitfenster: Pre-dose (0 hours) and 1.5 hours post-dose on Day 3; pre-dose (0 hours) and 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24 hours post dose on Days 7 and 14; pre-dose (0 hours) or 24 hours post-dose at EOT (any day before or at Day 180)
Observed plasma concentrations of Isavuconazole were reported in this outcome measure.
Pre-dose (0 hours) and 1.5 hours post-dose on Day 3; pre-dose (0 hours) and 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24 hours post dose on Days 7 and 14; pre-dose (0 hours) or 24 hours post-dose at EOT (any day before or at Day 180)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Pfizer

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Nützliche Links

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

7. Februar 2023

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

11. April 2025

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

11. April 2025

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

18. November 2022

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

18. November 2022

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

30. November 2022

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

27. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

26. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • C3791001
  • NCT05630976 (Registrierungskennung: ClinicalTrials.gov)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Pfizer gewährt Zugang zu individuellen anonymisierten Teilnehmerdaten und zugehörigen Studiendokumenten (z. Protokoll, statistischer Analyseplan (SAP), klinischer Studienbericht (CSR)) auf Anfrage von qualifizierten Forschern und vorbehaltlich bestimmter Kriterien, Bedingungen und Ausnahmen. Weitere Einzelheiten zu Pfizers Kriterien für die gemeinsame Nutzung von Daten und das Verfahren zur Beantragung des Zugriffs finden Sie unter: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren