Defining the Ablative Dose for Y-90 TARE (MARGIN)
10. September 2026 aktualisiert von: Andrew Gordon, Northwestern University
A Prospective Dose-Escalation Study to Define an Ablative Dose of Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization Using Advanced Dosimetry and Functional MRI (MARGIN Study)
This study is being done to help doctors improve how they treat liver tumors that cannot be removed by surgery or treated with standard ablation techniques.
The researchers want to find out the best amount of radiation that needs to be delivered to completely destroy (or ablate) parts of the liver that have cancer.
Studienübersicht
Status
Rekrutierung
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Currently, doctors use Yttrium-90 (Y90) radiation segmentectomy, a treatment that delivers tiny radioactive beads into the blood vessels feeding the liver tumor. These beads give off radiation that helps kill the cancer cells from the inside, right where the tumor is located. This approach allows doctors to target the tumor very precisely, while keeping the rest of the liver as healthy as possible. However, the exact dose needed to fully ablate a tumor without damaging healthy liver tissue is not well established.
To answer this, the study team will use specialized imaging before and after treatment to evaluate how the radiation is distributed in the liver and how the liver responds over time. These imaging procedures include PET/CT or PET/MRI scans, which are standard medical imaging tests that are not considered experimental. During these scans, a small amount of a safe radioactive substance is injected into a participant's vein. This helps show where the Y90 beads are located in the participant's liver.
In a PET/CT scan, two types of imaging are performed during the same session. The PET scan detects signals from the radioactive substance and shows how the participant's liver is functioning at a molecular level. The CT scan, which uses x-rays to create detailed cross-sectional images of the body, provides a precise anatomical map that helps localize these functional signals. Together, they give a clear picture of both the structure and activity within the liver.
PET/MRI works similarly but uses magnetic fields and radio waves instead of x-rays. It combines the functional information from the PET scan with the highly detailed soft-tissue images from MRI, which can be especially useful in evaluating the liver. Both imaging techniques are done during a single visit, with the PET component typically performed at the same time as the CT or MRI, depending on which machine is used. Participants will also undergo a liver MRI with dual contrast using Eovist and extracellular gadolinium, another standard imaging procedure. MRI uses magnets and radio waves to take detailed pictures of the liver. Eovist is a special dye injected into a participant's vein during the scan that helps highlight liver tissue and shows how well different parts of the liver are functioning. Extracellular gadolinium is a more general contrast agent that enhances blood vessels and tissues, providing complementary information. This imaging helps the doctors confirm whether the tumor area was completely treated.
The goal is to determine the safest and most effective dose of radiation to fully treat cancer while preserving healthy liver tissue. This information may help doctors treat future patients more precisely and safely.
Yttrium-90 and the imaging methods used in this study, including PET/CT, PET/MRI, and dual contrast MRI, are FDA-approved.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
30
Phase
- Phase 2
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienkontakt
- Name: Andrew C Gordon, MD, PhD
- Telefonnummer: (561)703-0134
- E-Mail: andrew.gordon@nm.org
Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung
- Name: Saad Abu Zahra, MD
- Telefonnummer: 646-996-2817
- E-Mail: saad.abuzahra@northwestern.edu
Studienorte
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Vereinigte Staaten, 60611
- Rekrutierung
- Northwestern University
-
Kontakt:
- Andrew C Gordon, MD, PhD
- Telefonnummer: (561)703-0134
- E-Mail: andrew.gordon@nm.org
-
Hauptermittler:
- Andrew C Gordon, MD, PhD
-
Unterermittler:
- Robert J Lewandowski, MD, FSIR
-
Unterermittler:
- Amir A Borhani, MD
-
Unterermittler:
- Saad E Abu Zahra, MD
-
Kontakt:
- Saad Abu Zahra, MD
- Telefonnummer: 646-996-2817
- E-Mail: saad.abuzahra@northwestern.edu
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma, or liver-dominant metastatic disease not amenable to surgical resection or ablation.
- Age ≥18 years.
- Child-Pugh class A or B liver function
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
- Adequate organ and bone marrow function as defined below:
- Leukocytes (WBC) ≥ 3,000/mcL
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mcL
- Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL
- Platelets ≥ 50,000/mcL
- Total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL
- AST ≤ 100 U/L, ALT ≤ 120 U/L
- Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL or estimated GFR ≥ 40 mL/min/1.73 m²
- Ability to undergo imaging and laboratory evaluations required by the study.
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Extrahepatic metastases.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals.
- Tumors requiring treatment of more than two Couinaud segments.
- Known hypersensitivity to gadolinium-based contrast agents.
- Contraindications to MRI (e.g., incompatible pacemakers, claustrophobia unresponsive to sedation).
- Coagulopathy or clinical instability precluding angiographic intervention.
- Prisoners or individuals under legal custody.
- Adults unable to consent.
- Individuals under 18 years of age.
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Cirrhotic
Cirrhotic patients will begin at 300 Gy.
Dose escalation will proceed in 100 Gy increments within each arm, with safety continuously evaluated by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee
|
The objective of this study is to define an optimal "ablative dose" range for Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy that achieves complete sectoral ablation detectable on dual contrast MRI and to determine whether this dose-response relationship differs between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Non-cirrhotic
Non-cirrhotic patients will begin at a dose of 200 Gy.
Dose escalation will proceed in 100 Gy increments within each arm, with safety continuously evaluated by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee.
|
The objective of this study is to define an optimal "ablative dose" range for Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy that achieves complete sectoral ablation detectable on dual contrast MRI and to determine whether this dose-response relationship differs between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Ablative Dose Threshold for Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to the end of post-treatment Y90 12 month follow up visit
|
To prospectively define the "ablative dose" threshold for Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy (RS) using post-treatment PET dosimetry and hepatobiliary phase MRI
|
From enrollment to the end of post-treatment Y90 12 month follow up visit
|
|
Impact of Cirrhosis on Ablative Dose Requirements
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to enrollment to post-treatment Y-90 12 month follow-up visit
|
To determine whether cirrhotic patients require a higher threshold dose for ablation compared to non- cirrhotic patients
|
From enrollment to enrollment to post-treatment Y-90 12 month follow-up visit
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Y90 Dose with Imaging Biomarkers
Zeitfenster: Assessed at 1, 4-9, and 12 month follow up visits
|
To evaluate the correlation between delivered Y90 dose and imaging biomarkers, including signal loss on hepatobiliary phase MRI, ablative margins, extracellular volume fraction, and perfusion changes
|
Assessed at 1, 4-9, and 12 month follow up visits
|
|
Tumor Response and Time-to-Progression Assessment
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to end of post-treatment Y-90 12 month follow up visit
|
To assess tumor response by mRECIST and determine time to progression (TTP)
|
From enrollment to end of post-treatment Y-90 12 month follow up visit
|
|
Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Y90 Doses
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to end of post-treatment Y90 12 month follow up visit
|
To assess the safety and tolerability of escalating segmental Y90 doses (200- 500 Gy) using Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) dose-escalation design under Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) oversight
|
From enrollment to end of post-treatment Y90 12 month follow up visit
|
Andere Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Pathologic Necrosis in Explanted Tumors
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to end of post-treatment Y90 12 month follow-up visit
|
To evaluate complete pathological necrosis in explanted tumors from patients who undergo liver resection or transplantation
|
From enrollment to end of post-treatment Y90 12 month follow-up visit
|
|
Early Imaging Biomarkers for Ablation Success
Zeitfenster: From enrollment to post-treatment Y90 12 month follow-up visit
|
To identify novel early imaging biomarkers (Eovist hepatobiliary phase defects, extracellular volume mapping, perfusion changes) that may serve as surrogates for ablation success
|
From enrollment to post-treatment Y90 12 month follow-up visit
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 22;365(12):1118-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1001683. No abstract available.
- Llovet JM, Schwartz M, Mazzaferro V. Resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25(2):181-200. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871198.
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
- Riaz A, Miller FH, Kulik LM, Nikolaidis P, Yaghmai V, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Gupta R, Wang E, Baker T, Abecassis M, Benson AB 3rd, Nemcek AA Jr, Omary R, Salem R. Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA. 2010 Mar 17;303(11):1062-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.262.
- Befeler AS, Di Bisceglie AM. Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2002 May;122(6):1609-19. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33411.
- Mouli SK, Raiter S, Harris K, Mylarapu A, Burks M, Li W, Gordon AC, Khan A, Matsumoto M, Bailey KL, Pasciak AS, Manupipatpong S, Weiss CR, Casalino D, Miller FH, Gates VL, Hohlastos E, Lewandowski RJ, Kim DH, Dreher MR, Salem R. Yttrium-90 Radioembolization to the Prostate Gland: Proof of Concept in a Canine Model and Clinical Translation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Aug;32(8):1103-1112.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.01.282. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
- Garin E, Tselikas L, Guiu B, Chalaye J, Edeline J, de Baere T, Assenat E, Tacher V, Robert C, Terroir-Cassou-Mounat M, Mariano-Goulart D, Amaddeo G, Palard X, Hollebecque A, Kafrouni M, Regnault H, Boudjema K, Grimaldi S, Fourcade M, Kobeiter H, Vibert E, Le Sourd S, Piron L, Sommacale D, Laffont S, Campillo-Gimenez B, Rolland Y; DOSISPHERE-01 Study Group. Personalised versus standard dosimetry approach of selective internal radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (DOSISPHERE-01): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;6(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30290-9. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
- Gordon AC, Gates VL, White SB, Harris KR, Procissi D, Zhang Z, Li W, Samaan D, Nicolai JR, Mouli SK, Sato KT, Ryu RK, Omary RA, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Larson AC. Correlation and Agreement of Yttrium-90 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography with Ex Vivo Radioembolization Microsphere Deposition in the Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Jan;32(1):23-32.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.09.016. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
- Luetkens JA, Klein S, Traber F, Schmeel FC, Sprinkart AM, Kuetting DLR, Block W, Uschner FE, Schierwagen R, Hittatiya K, Kristiansen G, Gieseke J, Schild HH, Trebicka J, Kukuk GM. Quantification of Liver Fibrosis at T1 and T2 Mapping with Extracellular Volume Fraction MRI: Preclinical Results. Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):748-754. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180051. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
- Syed M, Shah J, Montazeri SA, Grajo JR, Geller B, Toskich B. Analysis of dynamic hepatobiliary contrast-enhanced MRI signal intensity after Yttrium-90 radioembolization with glass microspheres for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May;46(5):2182-2187. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02855-2. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
- Borhani AA, Elsayes KM, Catania R, Kambadakone A, Furlan A, Kierans AS, Kamath A, Harmath C, Horvat N, Humar A, Kielar AZ. Imaging Evaluation of Living Liver Donor Candidates: Techniques, Protocols, and Anatomy. Radiographics. 2021 Oct;41(6):1572-1591. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021210012.
- Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, Ryu RK, Giakoumis Spear G, Mulcahy MF, Abecassis M, Baker T, Gates V, Nayar R, Miller FH, Sato KT, Omary RA, Salem R. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres. Hepatology. 2009 Apr;49(4):1185-93. doi: 10.1002/hep.22747.
- Garin E, Rolland Y, Edeline J, Icard N, Lenoir L, Laffont S, Mesbah H, Breton M, Sulpice L, Boudjema K, Rohou T, Raoul JL, Clement B, Boucher E. Personalized dosimetry with intensification using 90Y-loaded glass microsphere radioembolization induces prolonged overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein thrombosis. J Nucl Med. 2015 Mar;56(3):339-46. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145177. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
- Gates VL, Esmail AA, Marshall K, Spies S, Salem R. Internal pair production of 90Y permits hepatic localization of microspheres using routine PET: proof of concept. J Nucl Med. 2011 Jan;52(1):72-6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.080986. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
- Kao YH, Tan EH, Lim KY, Ng CE, Goh SW. Yttrium-90 internal pair production imaging using first generation PET/CT provides high-resolution images for qualitative diagnostic purposes. Br J Radiol. 2012 Jul;85(1015):1018-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr/33524085. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
- Elschot M, Vermolen BJ, Lam MG, de Keizer B, van den Bosch MA, de Jong HW. Quantitative comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for imaging the in vivo yttrium-90 microsphere distribution after liver radioembolization. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055742. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
- Salem R, Johnson GE, Kim E, Riaz A, Bishay V, Boucher E, Fowers K, Lewandowski R, Padia SA. Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for the Treatment of Solitary, Unresectable HCC: The LEGACY Study. Hepatology. 2021 Nov;74(5):2342-2352. doi: 10.1002/hep.31819. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
- Gabr A, Riaz A, Johnson GE, Kim E, Padia S, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Correlation of Y90-absorbed radiation dose to pathological necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: confirmatory multicenter analysis in 45 explants. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Feb;48(2):580-583. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04976-8. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
- Gupta AN, Serhal M, Gordon AC, Gabr A, Kalyan A, Kulik L, Sato KT, Riaz A, Hohlastos ES, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Radiation Segmentectomy and Modified Radiation Lobectomy for Unresectable Early-Stage Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Apr;36(4):650-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.12.016. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
- Vouche M, Habib A, Ward TJ, Kim E, Kulik L, Ganger D, Mulcahy M, Baker T, Abecassis M, Sato KT, Caicedo JC, Fryer J, Hickey R, Hohlastos E, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to radiofrequency ablation: multicenter radiology-pathology correlation and survival of radiation segmentectomy. Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):192-201. doi: 10.1002/hep.27057. Epub 2014 May 27.
- Riaz A, Gates VL, Atassi B, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Baker T, Kulik L, Gupta R, Abecassis M, Benson AB 3rd, Omary R, Millender L, Kennedy A, Salem R. Radiation segmentectomy: a novel approach to increase safety and efficacy of radioembolization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.062. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
- Salem R, Gordon AC, Mouli S, Hickey R, Kallini J, Gabr A, Mulcahy MF, Baker T, Abecassis M, Miller FH, Yaghmai V, Sato K, Desai K, Thornburg B, Benson AB, Rademaker A, Ganger D, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ. Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec;151(6):1155-1163.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
15. Mai 2026
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
1. Februar 2029
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
1. Mai 2029
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
7. Mai 2026
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
7. Mai 2026
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
14. Mai 2026
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
15. September 2026
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
10. September 2026
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Mai 2026
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Neubildungen nach Standort
- Neubildungen
- Neubildungen nach histologischem Typ
- Neoplasmen des Verdauungssystems
- Erkrankungen des Verdauungssystems
- Leberkrankheiten
- Neubildungen, Drüsen und Epithelien
- Adenokarzinom
- Karzinom
- Pathologische Zustände, Anzeichen und Symptome
- Morphologische und mikroskopische Befunde
- Karzinom, hepatozellulär
- Lebertumoren
- Ränder der Exzision
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- STU00224943
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .