Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

AI-Assisted Endoscopy for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions (H&NANCE)

12. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Head&Neck Application of Novel Computer-assisted Endoscopy

This is a prospective observational clinical study designed to evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms applied to upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) video-endoscopy. The study assesses three main tasks: lesion detection (localization), classification (benign vs malignant), and segmentation of tumor margins.

AI algorithms will be applied to endoscopic video data acquired during routine clinical practice without influencing clinical decision-making. The system will process images in real time and store data for subsequent analysis. AI outputs will be compared with physician assessment and reference standard histopathology to evaluate diagnostic performance.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The artificial intelligence algorithms developed will be employed in the analysis of laryngeal lesions for 3 tasks:

  • Task 1: Computer aided diagnosis (CADx): the algorithm provides a differential diagnosis between benign and malignant neoplasms (binary classification) and the exact histology (multiclass classification). During the UADT video-endoscopy in the outpatient clinic, the physician performs the video-endoscopy and selects and captures n.3 WL and n.3 NBI significant frames of the lesion. The AI model records the classification output of the algorithm that the physician cannot access. The predicted pathologic results will be finally displayed as two different classifications along with the probability of each prediction (0% to 100%) as estimated by the AI algorithm: a first binary classification "neoplastic" or "non-neoplastic," and a second multiclass classification with the exact histology. The physician subsequently, based on the endoscopic examination, will write the suspected diagnosis (benign vs. malignant lesion and the actual histology) in the appropriate patient chart. Next, the physician reviews the screenshot taken and makes sure the lesion is visible in every one of them. Retrospectively, an investigator (blinded to the physician's assessment) will review the AI processed frames with the resulting CADx classifications and mark the AI-processed diagnosis in the patient chart. Once biopsied, the final histology of the lesion analyzed by definitive histopathological examination is recorded in the patient chart by the investigator. The investigators will finally compare the two recorded diagnoses (CADx and physician) with the definitive histology.
  • Task 2: Computer aided detection (CADe): the algorithm, through the representation of a rectangle (bounding box), localizes the lesion during the video-endoscopy in the outpatient clinic in real-time. During the UADT video-endoscopy, the physician performs the video-endoscopy as for standard-of-care procedure. In parallel, the AI model processes in real-time the endoscopic video and records the output of the algorithm (which the physician cannot access). The physician captures n.3 WL and n.3 NBI significant frames of the lesion. Moreover, n.3 frames where no lesions are visible are captured as negative controls. Later, the physician reviews the screenshot taken and makes sure to label the frames where the lesion is visible as "positive cases" and the frame where the lesion is not visible as "negative cases". The investigators will finally assess if the lesion was detected by the CADe system to define a "true positive". Similarly, to define a true negative, the CADe system should have not output a bounding box in the majority of the "negative cases" frames.
  • Task 3: Computer aided segmentation (CASe): the algorithm analyzes the neoplasm margins and provides a delineation mask. In the operating room setting, once the lesion to be resected is identified with a 0° telescope, the surgeon captures n.1 WL and n.1 NBI close-up photographs that exemplify the superficial lesion margins. The same procedure is repeated with a 70° optics and other two photographs are acquired. The frames taken are then saved and analyzed by the AI algorithm, which will perform the segmentation task. The surgeon will be blinded to the AI prediction. Later, the surgeon will draw the margins of the lesion according to her/his evaluation of each captured frame. The annotated frame will be saved so that it can be analyzed at a later time. Afterwards, in cases where positive superficial margins are identified by histopathologic examination, the surgeon-designed margins and the AI model ones will be compared to see if there was any difference in the suggested margin.

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

283

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

  • Belgien
    • Flemish Brabant
      • Leuven, Flemish Brabant, Belgien, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Vincent Vander Poorten, MD PhD
  • Italien
    • GE
      • Genova, GE, Italien, 16131
        • IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Francesco Mora, MD PhD
  • Spanien
    • Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Barcelona, Spanien, 08036
        • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Claudio Sampieri, MD PhD

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

The sample size for a single-arm, prospective cohort study, where the same group of patients undergoes testing with an AI model and a human physician and then they are compared with the gold standard reference test (biopsy) was calculated based on information from previous studies

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Injury originating from the upper aero-digestive tract
  • Recording of the video-endoscopic examination
  • Patient known to undergo a biopsy of the lesion or clinical follow-up for lesion with known biopsy (e.g. laryngeal papillomatosis) or suffering from Reinke's edema (in this pathology, in fact, biopsy is not necessary since the diagnosis is clinical)
  • Or patients undergoing transoral lesion excision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Submucosal lesion
  • Patients with previous operations on the upper aero-digestive tract
  • Patients with previous radiotherapy of the head and neck district
  • Poor compliance on endoscopic examination
  • Unavailability of CADe/CADx or CASe data logging note

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Negative Predictive Value of the CADx Algorithm for Malignant or Premalignant Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions
Zeitfenster: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of the computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) algorithm for classifying UADT lesions as malignant/premalignant versus benign/non-neoplastic, using definitive histopathology as the reference standard. The CADx final classification will be based on the majority rule across selected white-light and narrow-band imaging frames. NPV = true negatives / (true negatives + false negatives). The pre-specified performance target is NPV ≥ 90%.
From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Sensitivity of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions
Zeitfenster: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Sensitivity of the computer-aided detection (CADe) algorithm for localizing UADT lesions with a bounding box. A true positive is defined as localization of the lesion area by a bounding box in the majority of physician-labeled lesion-positive captured frames. Sensitivity = true positives / (true positives + false negatives).
At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Median Intersection Over Union Between CASe Segmentation and Surgeon-Drawn Lesion Margins
Zeitfenster: At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.
Median overlap between the AI-generated segmentation mask and the lesion margin area drawn by the surgeon on intraoperative endoscopic images. Intersection over Union (IoU) = area of overlap / area of union. Values range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate greater agreement.
At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.
Median Dice Similarity Coefficient Between CASe Segmentation and Surgeon-Drawn Lesion Margins
Zeitfenster: At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.
Median Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) between the AI-generated segmentation mask and the lesion margin area drawn by the surgeon on intraoperative endoscopic images. Dice Similarity Coefficient = 2 × area of overlap / (AI segmented area + surgeon-drawn area). Values range from 0 to 1; higher values indicate greater agreement.
At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
WL-NPV vs. NBI-NPV of CADx classification
Zeitfenster: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.

Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of CADx classification calculated using only the three selected white-light frames, compared with definitive histopathology, vs. NPV of CADx classification calculated using only the three selected narrow-band imaging frames, compared with definitive histopathology.

The final AI-result will be calculated based on the majority rule of the 3 WL and 3 NBI frames computed separately.
From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Clinician-Reported Usability Score for the AI Endoscopy System
Zeitfenster: Assessed after clinician use of the AI system during study procedures, up to 20 months after study initiation.
Usability of the AI endoscopy system assessed using standardized usability questionnaires administered to clinicians after use of the AI system. Questionnaire scoring will be interpreted according to the selected questionnaire manual, with higher scores indicating greater usability.
Assessed after clinician use of the AI system during study procedures, up to 20 months after study initiation.
Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of CADx histology prediction
Zeitfenster: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of the CADx algorithm for histology prediction, compared with definitive histopathology.
From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
F1 Score of CADx Classification
Zeitfenster: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
F1 score of the CADx classification output compared with definitive histopathology.
From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of CADx Classification
Zeitfenster: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
AUC of the ROC curve for CADx classification of UADT lesions compared with definitive histopathology.
From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of human physician histology prediction
Zeitfenster: From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Sensitivity, Specificity an Accuracy of the treating physician's suspected diagnosis compared with definitive histopathology.
From index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy until definitive histopathology result is available, assessed up to 60 days after endoscopy.
Specificity of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions
Zeitfenster: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Proportion of physician-labeled lesion-negative frames/cases in which the CADe algorithm does not output a bounding box in the majority of negative-control frames.
At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Accuracy of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions
Zeitfenster: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Overall proportion of correctly classified lesion-positive and lesion-negative cases/frames by the CADe algorithm.
At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Positive Predictive Value of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions
Zeitfenster: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Positive predictive value of CADe bounding-box output for lesion localization. PPV = true positives / (true positives + false positives).
At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Negative Predictive Value of the CADe Algorithm for Localization of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Lesions
Zeitfenster: At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Negative predictive value of CADe absence of bounding-box output for lesion localization. NPV = true negatives / (true negatives + false negatives).
At index outpatient UADT video-endoscopy, with blinded post-processing assessment performed up to 30 days after endoscopy.
Percentage of Positive Superficial Margin Cases in Which the AI-Predicted Tumor Area Is Wider Than the Surgeon-Drawn Area
Zeitfenster: At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.
Among cases with positive superficial margins on final histopathology, percentage of cases in which the AI-predicted tumor area extends beyond the surgeon-drawn margin at the affected margin.
At intraoperative pre-resection endoscopy, with assessment performed after image annotation up to 30 days after surgery.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Mitarbeiter

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Universita degli Studi di Genova
CRO "Centro Clinical Trials" IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Università degli Studi 'G. d'Annunzio' Chieti e Pescara
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Februar 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

5. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

12. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

19. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

19. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

12. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • IIT_AIRCARE_H&NANCE

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Papua New Guinea

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren