Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures
30. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Junbo Liang
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Patients With Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted treatment versus conventional surgery in patients with Tile B and C pelvic fractures.
Eligible patients will be stratified according to Tile fracture classification and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either robot assisted minimally invasive fixation or conventional surgical treatment.
Primary and secondary outcomes include pain relief, early mobilization, functional recovery, imaging outcomes, perioperative complications, venous thromboembolism events, laboratory parameters, opioid consumption, and healthcare resource utilization.
The study aims to provide evidence for optimizing surgical treatment strategies for unstable pelvic fractures.
Studienübersicht
Status
Noch keine Rekrutierung
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
This study is a prospective, single center, stratified randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of robot assisted treatment versus conventional surgery in patients with Tile B and C pelvic fractures.
A total of 88 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the robot assisted treatment group or the conventional surgery group. Randomization will be stratified according to Tile fracture classification (Tile B or Tile C) using a computer generated randomization sequence.
Eligible participants include adult patients diagnosed with Tile B or Tile C pelvic fractures within 3 weeks after injury. The primary objective is to compare perioperative outcomes, pain control, early mobilization, functional recovery, imaging outcomes, complications, opioid consumption, and healthcare resource utilization between treatment strategies.
Patients in the robot assisted treatment group will undergo robot assisted minimally invasive fixation using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement. Patients in the conventional surgery group will undergo standard open surgical fixation according to fracture characteristics and surgeon judgment.
Outcome measures include pain scores, Majeed pelvic function score, EQ 5D, SMFA, imaging evaluation of fracture healing, laboratory parameters, venous thromboembolism events, opioid consumption, perioperative indicators, complications, and healthcare costs. Follow up assessments will be performed at postoperative day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.
The results of this study may provide evidence regarding the optimal surgical treatment strategy for Tile B and C pelvic fractures.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
88
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienkontakt
- Name: Junbo Liang, Dr.
- Telefonnummer: 0576-85190463
- E-Mail: liangjb@enzemed.com
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosis of Tile B or Tile C pelvic fracture
- Injury duration less than 3 weeks
- Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe open injury or skin infection at the surgical site
- Hemodynamic instability preventing anesthesia or surgery
- Severe psychiatric disorders or dementia
- Severe obesity affecting imaging quality
- Severe systemic diseases preventing surgery
- Pathological fracture
- Current chemotherapy, radiotherapy, systemic corticosteroid therapy, or growth factor therapy
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Doppelt
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Robot Assisted Treatment Group
Participants undergo robot assisted minimally invasive fixation using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for Tile B and C pelvic fractures.
|
Robot assisted minimally invasive fixation is performed using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Conventional Surgery Group
Participants undergo conventional open surgical fixation for Tile B and C pelvic fractures.
|
Robot assisted minimally invasive fixation is performed using robotic navigation assisted percutaneous screw placement for stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Zeitfenster: At 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, day 1, day 2, day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain.
Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate worse pain severity.
|
At 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, day 1, day 2, day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
|
Majeed Pelvic Function Score
Zeitfenster: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
The Majeed Pelvic Function Score is used to evaluate functional recovery after pelvic fracture treatment.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functional outcomes and quality of life.
|
At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level Questionnaire
Zeitfenster: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
Health related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L).
The EQ-5D index score ranges from values below 0 (health states considered worse than death) to 1.0 (full health).
Higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
|
At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
|
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA)
Zeitfenster: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
Musculoskeletal function assessed using the 46-item Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).
Raw questionnaire scores are transformed to a standardized score ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate worse musculoskeletal function and greater disability.
|
At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
|
Imaging Outcomes and Fracture Healing
Zeitfenster: At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
Assessment of fracture healing, secondary displacement, bone mineral density changes, and muscle mass changes using pelvic CT and imaging examinations.
|
At day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment
|
|
Complication
Zeitfenster: From treatment initiation to 1 year follow up
|
From treatment initiation to 1 year follow up
|
|
|
Opioid Consumption
Zeitfenster: Postoperative Days 0-3
|
Assessment of cumulative opioid consumption during hospitalization
|
Postoperative Days 0-3
|
|
Serum C-Reactive Protein Level
Zeitfenster: Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.
|
Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.
|
|
|
D-Dimer Level
Zeitfenster: Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.
|
Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.
|
|
|
Hemoglobin Level
Zeitfenster: Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.
|
Preoperative, Day 1, Day 3, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment.
|
|
|
Operative Time
Zeitfenster: Perioperative
|
Duration of surgery measured in minutes.
|
Perioperative
|
|
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Zeitfenster: Perioperative
|
Estimated intraoperative blood loss measured in milliliters.
|
Perioperative
|
|
Length of Surgical Incision
Zeitfenster: Perioperative
|
Length of skin incision measured in centimeters.
|
Perioperative
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Lu Z, Xiuxiu H, Xing B. Retrospective analysis of the use of orthopedic reduction robots in treating low-energy osteoporotic unstable pelvic fractures in the elderly. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Sep 26;20(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06258-1.
- Zwingmann J, Konrad G, Kotter E, Sudkamp NP, Oberst M. Computer-navigated iliosacral screw insertion reduces malposition rate and radiation exposure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jul;467(7):1833-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0632-6. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
- Hoffmann MF, Yilmaz E, Norvel DC, Schildhauer TA. Navigated iliac screw placement may reduce radiation and OR time in lumbopelvic fixation of unstable complex sacral fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct;31(7):1427-1433. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02892-7. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
- Gericke L, Fritz A, Osterhoff G, Josten C, Pieroh P, Hoch A. Percutaneous operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis may not increase the general rate of complications compared to non-operative treatment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3729-3735. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01660-w. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
- Ran D, Wang C. Efficacy and safety of different fixation methods for unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2563000. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2563000. Epub 2025 Oct 6.
- Lu S, Liu F, Xu W, Zhou X, Li L, Zhou D, Li Q, Dong J. Management of Open Tile C Pelvic Fractures and Their Outcomes: A Retrospective Study of 30 Cases. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Sep 10;18:929-937. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S378740. eCollection 2022.
- de Ridder VA, Whiting PS, Balogh ZJ, Mir HR, Schultz BJ, Routt MC. Pelvic ring injuries: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. OTA Int. 2023 Jun 16;6(3 Suppl):e261. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000261. eCollection 2023 Jun.
- Tienpratarn W, Nakpipat N, Yuksen C, Wongwaisayawan S, Phootothum Y, Jaiboon S. Clinical Associated Factors of Tile B/C Type of Pelvic Ring Fractures; a Retrospective Cross-sectional study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 May 12;12(1):e49. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2243. eCollection 2024.
- Ding H, Wang W, Sun W, Liu L, Huang M, Han D, Lu Y, Zhou J, Pan J. Clinical characteristics and mortality risk factors in polytrauma patients with pelvic fractures: a retrospective study based on an integrated multidisciplinary treatment approach. Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Oct 6;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00990-5.
- Ohla J, Walus P, Wicinski M, Malkowski B, Turon B, Jablonski A, Gawryjolek M, Kellett K, Zabrzynski J. Pelvic Fractures in Adults and the Importance of Associated Injuries-A Current Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Clin Pract. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):130. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15070130.
- Hermans E, Biert J, Edwards MJR. Epidemiology of Pelvic Ring Fractures in a Level 1 Trauma Center in the Netherlands. Hip Pelvis. 2017 Dec;29(4):253-261. doi: 10.5371/hp.2017.29.4.253. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
1. Juni 2026
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
1. Juni 2027
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
30. Dezember 2028
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
24. Mai 2026
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
30. Mai 2026
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
3. Juni 2026
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
3. Juni 2026
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
30. Mai 2026
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Mai 2026
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- K20260304
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
UNENTSCHIEDEN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .