Applied Research on a Non-pharmacological Intervention Program for Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline
1. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Zhi Cai, China Medical University, China
Applied Research on a Group-based Non-pharmacological Intervention Program for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline
This study aims to verify the short-term and long-term effects of a group-based non-pharmacological intervention program for community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline, and to evaluate its implementation outcomes, through a rigorously designed cluster randomized controlled trial.
Studienübersicht
Status
Noch keine Rekrutierung
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
This study adopts a cluster randomized controlled design to implement a group-based non-pharmacological intervention for older adults with subjective cognitive decline.
The effects of the intervention on global cognitive function, episodic memory, executive function, attention, language function, subjective memory function, anxiety, depression, social participation, gait speed, physical activity level, and healthy lifestyle behaviors will be evaluated.
In addition, implementation outcomes will be assessed based on the RE-AIM framework and the CFIR framework.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
218
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria Aged ≥60 Community dwelling Subjective memory decline, confirmed by Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire(SCD-Q9)≥5 Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores ≥19, 22, or 24 for participants who had primary school, middle school, or higher education, respectively Overall intact activities of daily living No planned exercise or cognitive intervention activities within the past six months Voluntary participants who will be informed of the study objectives by the researcher and will sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria Any other neurodegenerative diseases (such as mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Parkinson's disease, stroke, etc.) Any severe or unstable internal medical conditions (i.e., unstable or severe asthma or heart disease, liver and kidney diseases, uncontrolled hypertension, severe metabolic diseases, etc.) Severe depressive, anxiety or other psychiatric disorders Movement contraindications Those currently participating in other research trials.
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Verhütung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Doppelt
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Non-Pharmacological Interventions
|
6 components(social intercourse, cognitive interventions, physical activities interventions, rational diet, understanding and risk management of diseases, emotion management)
|
|
Sonstiges: Waiting List Control Group
To ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group.
|
To ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Episodic memory
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
Using the Huashan version of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) for assessment, it is mainly used to evaluate immediate recall, short-delay recall, long-delay recall, and other key components.
The test includes 12 words belonging to three semantic categories (4 words per category).
The testing procedure is as follows: The examiner reads out the 12 words in sequence, and the subject immediately recalls them.
This process is repeated three consecutive times to form the immediate memory test.
After an interval of 5 minutes, short-delay recall is conducted, and after 20 minutes, long-delay recall is implemented.
The scoring rule is that each correctly recalled word earns 1 point.
The immediate memory score is the sum of correct recalls from the first three trials (maximum score 36).
This study records the scores for immediate recall, short-delay recall, and long-delay recall, with higher scores indicating better memory function.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
|
Gobal cognitive function
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
The assessment uses the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
Higher scores indicate better performance, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
|
Executive function
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
The Shape Trail Test (STT) was used to assess executive function.
The test consists of two parts: Part A requires participants to connect 25 numbers in ascending order; Part B involves 25 numbers presented within two different shapes.
The scoring indicators are the time taken to complete STT-A and STT-B, with shorter completion times indicating better executive function.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
|
Attention
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is used to assess the patient's attention.
The subject is required to match the corresponding symbols to the numbers (1-9) as quickly as possible within 90 seconds.
Each correctly filled symbol earns 1 point, and a reversed symbol earns 0.5 points.
The maximum score for the test is 90.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
|
Linguistic function
Zeitfenster: week0，weel12，week24
|
Animal verbal fluency is used to assess a patient's language fluency.
The test requires the subject to name as many examples as possible within the category of animals in one minute.
Scoring is typically based on the total number of correctly named animal names.
Lower scores indicate reduced language ability.
|
week0，weel12，week24
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Depression
Zeitfenster: week0，weel12，week24
|
The short version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (Geriatric Depression Scale-15, GDS-15) is used for assessment.
The total score ranges from 0 to 15, and the score is positively correlated with the severity of depression.
|
week0，weel12，week24
|
|
Anxiety
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory-20 (GAI-20) is used for assessment.
This scale consists of 20 items, and respondents answer based on their emotional feelings over the past week.
A response of "Yes" is scored as 1 point, while "No" is scored as 0 points.
The total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
|
Social network
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
The Lubben Social Network Scale-6 (LSNS-6) is a short version of the Lubben Social Network Scale.
It is primarily used to measure an individual's level of social connectedness in two dimensions: family relationships and peer interactions.
The scale consists of six assessment items and uses a graded scoring system: 0 points indicate no such social members, 1 point corresponds to 1 person, 2 points to 2 people, 3 points to 3-4 people, 4 points to 5-8 people, and 5 points applies to groups of 9 or more individuals.
Lower scores indicate poorer levels of social network connectedness.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
|
Social participation
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
This study employed the Social Participation Level Assessment Tool revised by Wei Xiuping, which was developed based on national health survey data of the elderly population.
The measurement tool comprises two main dimensions: cultural organization participation and family/personal affairs, encompassing a total of 10 specific items.
A five-point Likert scale was used for measurement, and the total score is positively correlated with the level of social participation-that is, a higher score indicates a more significant degree of social participation among the respondents.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
|
Timed "Up and Go" test
Zeitfenster: week0，week12，week24
|
During the test, the participant sits on a chair with armrests and a backrest.
Upon hearing the instruction, they stand up, walk 3 meters forward at their usual gait, then turn around, return to the chair, and sit down.
The average of two test trials is recorded.
|
week0，week12，week24
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
30. Juni 2026
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
30. Juni 2029
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
1. Dezember 2029
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
20. Mai 2026
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
1. Juni 2026
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
5. Juni 2026
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
5. Juni 2026
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
1. Juni 2026
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Juni 2026
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 【2026】161
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .