Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Serpentine vs Traditional Hydrophilic Guidewire Tracking in Complex Radial Anatomy (S-TRACK)

15. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Grigorios Tsigkas, University Hospital of Patras

Comparison of the "Serpentine" Technique Versus Hydrophilic Guidewire 0,035'' for Navigating Radial and Brachial Artery Loops, Tortuosity and Sharp Angulation During Transradial Access.

Coronary angiography and angioplasty are commonly performed through the radial artery. In some patients, anatomical variations of the radial and brachial arteries, such as loops, increased tortuosity or sharp angulations may pose challenges to equipment advancement.

Both the hydrophilic guidewire 0,035'' approach and the "Serpentine" technique have been described in the literature as techniques for overcoming radial anatomical challenges, with the hydrophilic guidewire approach being the more commonly used method.

In practical terms, both techniques involve the use of the same standard materials, with differences relating mainly to operator handling and technical manipulation. This study does not introduce any experimental device, material, or treatment; instead, it aims to compare the established approach using a 0.035'' hydrophilic guidewire with the emerging " Serpentine" technique with respect to effectiveness, procedural time, and safety.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Transradial access (TRA) has become the preferred approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), compared with transfemoral access (TFA). Contemporary guidelines on revascularization in both chronic and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) recommend TRA as the first-line strategy, primarily due to its reduced risk of complications.

Additional advantages of TRA include improved cost-effectiveness, shorter intensive care unit stay, shorter overall hospitalization, faster patient mobilization, and greater patient comfort. TRA has also been associated with reduced contrast use and a lower risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

Despite its advantages, TRA has limitations. It is associated with a modest increase in radiation exposure. A key drawback is the need for crossover to another access site, which is relatively common; however, this can be mitigated by operator experience and ultrasound guidance.

Anatomical variants are a major cause of procedural failure and crossover, occurring in 9-23% of patients. The most frequent variants include high origin of the radial artery from the brachial artery, arterial loops, and tortuosity of the radial or subclavian artery. Radial artery loops and severe tortuosity, observed in 4.2-13,1% of cases, are strongly associated with procedural failure (3.8-50%) and increased crossover rates. These anatomical challenges prolong procedural time, increase radiation exposure, and raise the risk of vascular complication.

Several techniques have been proposed to overcome these challenges. The most commonly adopted is the use of hydrophilic guidewires. Other techniques include mechanical straightening of tortuous segments from the operator, the use of angioplasty guidewires, microcatheters, balloon-assisted tracking (BAT), pigtail-assisted tracking (PAT), or switching to ulnar, transfemoral, or contralateral radial access.

Preservation of the transradial approach is critical, as it reduces complications, facilitates faster mobilization, and shortens hospital stay. The most common cause of TRA failure is the presence of loops and tortuosity in the radial or brachial artery. To date, no randomized trials have directly compared different strategies for overcoming these challenges. The novel "Serpentine" technique, which will be compared against the widely used "0.035" hydrophilic guidewire, could become an additional tool for interventional cardiologists-providing a reliable method for crossing loops and tortuous segments, with reduced equipment use and comparable outcomes in terms of procedure time, radiation exposure, contrast use, and local complications.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel "Serpentine" technique with that of hydrophilic guidewires in navigating radial and brachial artery loops and tortuosity during coronary angiography and PCI via TRA.

The S-TRACK Trial will be designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study. Consecutive eligible patients undergoing coronary angiography via transradial access, and not meeting any exclusion criteria, will be screened for enrollment. After successful radial artery cannulation, patients who demonstrate resistance to guidewire or catheter advancement will undergo radial and/or brachial angiography to identify the underlying anatomical cause. Participants with angiographically confirmed anatomical variants-specifically loops, pronounced tortuosity, or sharp angulations-will be considered eligible. Once the variant is confirmed, and oral consent provided, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to arterial navigation using either the standard hydrophilic 0.035'' guidewire-first technique or the Serpentine technique. At the end of the procedure informed consent will be signed. The study will involve operators-interventional cardiologists who will have been trained in the technique.

Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters will be recorded, including age, sex, medical history, and indications for angiography. Additionally, the anatomical location of the loop or tortuosity will be recorded.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

204

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

      • Pátrai, Griechenland, 26504
        • Rekrutierung
        • University Hospital of Patras
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Feasibility of TRA
  • Indication for coronary angiography
  • Angiographic documentation of radial or brachial artery loop/tortuosity
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • STEMI - high risk NSTEMI presentation
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Anatomical contraindications (e.g., arteriovenous fistula)
  • Significant calcification of the radial or brachial artery on angiographic evaluation.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Serpentine Technique
Participants will undergo transradial navigation of radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation using the Serpentine catheter manipulation technique to facilitate coronary angiography or PCI.
Catheter-based navigation technique using controlled rotational catheter manipulation to cross radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation during transradial coronary angiography or PCI.
Aktiver Komparator: Hydrophilic Technique
Participants will undergo transradial navigation of radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation using a standard 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire to facilitate coronary angiography or PCI.
Navigation of radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation using a 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire during transradial coronary angiography or PCI.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Successful crossing of anatomical obstacles and procedure completion
Zeitfenster: During coronary angiography/PCI procedure, assessed up to 3 hours
Successful crossing of radial/brachial artery loops or tortuosity with completion of coronary angiography or PCI.
During coronary angiography/PCI procedure, assessed up to 3 hours

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Total procedure time
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total procedure time until completion of coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Fluoroscopy time
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total fluoroscopy time measured during coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Radiation exposure
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Cumulative radiation dose assessed by Air Kerma and Dose Area Product (DAP) during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Contrast volume used
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total contrast medium volume used during coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Success rate of loop access per technique
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Successful navigation of radial or brachial artery loops or tortuosity using the assigned technique.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Number of guidewires used
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total number of guidewires used during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Number of catheters used
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total number of catheters used during coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Radial artery spasm
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Occurrence of radial artery spasm during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Procedure-related symptoms
Zeitfenster: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Pain (VAS 0-10), paresthesia, or paresis occurring during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Access-site vascular complications
Zeitfenster: From procedure completion until discharge, assessed up to 7 days
Occurrence of post-procedural hematoma (EASY scale), pseudoaneurysm, arterial dissection, or compartment syndrome.
From procedure completion until discharge, assessed up to 7 days

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Grigorios Tsigkas, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Patras

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

14. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2029

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2029

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

6. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

15. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

15. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren