Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Serpentine vs Traditional Hydrophilic Guidewire Tracking in Complex Radial Anatomy (S-TRACK)

15 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: Grigorios Tsigkas, University Hospital of Patras

Comparison of the "Serpentine" Technique Versus Hydrophilic Guidewire 0,035'' for Navigating Radial and Brachial Artery Loops, Tortuosity and Sharp Angulation During Transradial Access.

Coronary angiography and angioplasty are commonly performed through the radial artery. In some patients, anatomical variations of the radial and brachial arteries, such as loops, increased tortuosity or sharp angulations may pose challenges to equipment advancement.

Both the hydrophilic guidewire 0,035'' approach and the "Serpentine" technique have been described in the literature as techniques for overcoming radial anatomical challenges, with the hydrophilic guidewire approach being the more commonly used method.

In practical terms, both techniques involve the use of the same standard materials, with differences relating mainly to operator handling and technical manipulation. This study does not introduce any experimental device, material, or treatment; instead, it aims to compare the established approach using a 0.035'' hydrophilic guidewire with the emerging " Serpentine" technique with respect to effectiveness, procedural time, and safety.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Transradial access (TRA) has become the preferred approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), compared with transfemoral access (TFA). Contemporary guidelines on revascularization in both chronic and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) recommend TRA as the first-line strategy, primarily due to its reduced risk of complications.

Additional advantages of TRA include improved cost-effectiveness, shorter intensive care unit stay, shorter overall hospitalization, faster patient mobilization, and greater patient comfort. TRA has also been associated with reduced contrast use and a lower risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

Despite its advantages, TRA has limitations. It is associated with a modest increase in radiation exposure. A key drawback is the need for crossover to another access site, which is relatively common; however, this can be mitigated by operator experience and ultrasound guidance.

Anatomical variants are a major cause of procedural failure and crossover, occurring in 9-23% of patients. The most frequent variants include high origin of the radial artery from the brachial artery, arterial loops, and tortuosity of the radial or subclavian artery. Radial artery loops and severe tortuosity, observed in 4.2-13,1% of cases, are strongly associated with procedural failure (3.8-50%) and increased crossover rates. These anatomical challenges prolong procedural time, increase radiation exposure, and raise the risk of vascular complication.

Several techniques have been proposed to overcome these challenges. The most commonly adopted is the use of hydrophilic guidewires. Other techniques include mechanical straightening of tortuous segments from the operator, the use of angioplasty guidewires, microcatheters, balloon-assisted tracking (BAT), pigtail-assisted tracking (PAT), or switching to ulnar, transfemoral, or contralateral radial access.

Preservation of the transradial approach is critical, as it reduces complications, facilitates faster mobilization, and shortens hospital stay. The most common cause of TRA failure is the presence of loops and tortuosity in the radial or brachial artery. To date, no randomized trials have directly compared different strategies for overcoming these challenges. The novel "Serpentine" technique, which will be compared against the widely used "0.035" hydrophilic guidewire, could become an additional tool for interventional cardiologists-providing a reliable method for crossing loops and tortuous segments, with reduced equipment use and comparable outcomes in terms of procedure time, radiation exposure, contrast use, and local complications.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel "Serpentine" technique with that of hydrophilic guidewires in navigating radial and brachial artery loops and tortuosity during coronary angiography and PCI via TRA.

The S-TRACK Trial will be designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study. Consecutive eligible patients undergoing coronary angiography via transradial access, and not meeting any exclusion criteria, will be screened for enrollment. After successful radial artery cannulation, patients who demonstrate resistance to guidewire or catheter advancement will undergo radial and/or brachial angiography to identify the underlying anatomical cause. Participants with angiographically confirmed anatomical variants-specifically loops, pronounced tortuosity, or sharp angulations-will be considered eligible. Once the variant is confirmed, and oral consent provided, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to arterial navigation using either the standard hydrophilic 0.035'' guidewire-first technique or the Serpentine technique. At the end of the procedure informed consent will be signed. The study will involve operators-interventional cardiologists who will have been trained in the technique.

Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters will be recorded, including age, sex, medical history, and indications for angiography. Additionally, the anatomical location of the loop or tortuosity will be recorded.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

204

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

      • Pátrai, Grécia, 26504
        • Recrutamento
        • University Hospital of Patras
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Feasibility of TRA
  • Indication for coronary angiography
  • Angiographic documentation of radial or brachial artery loop/tortuosity
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • STEMI - high risk NSTEMI presentation
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Anatomical contraindications (e.g., arteriovenous fistula)
  • Significant calcification of the radial or brachial artery on angiographic evaluation.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Serpentine Technique
Participants will undergo transradial navigation of radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation using the Serpentine catheter manipulation technique to facilitate coronary angiography or PCI.
Catheter-based navigation technique using controlled rotational catheter manipulation to cross radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation during transradial coronary angiography or PCI.
Comparador Ativo: Hydrophilic Technique
Participants will undergo transradial navigation of radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation using a standard 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire to facilitate coronary angiography or PCI.
Navigation of radial or brachial artery loops, tortuosity, or sharp angulation using a 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire during transradial coronary angiography or PCI.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Successful crossing of anatomical obstacles and procedure completion
Prazo: During coronary angiography/PCI procedure, assessed up to 3 hours
Successful crossing of radial/brachial artery loops or tortuosity with completion of coronary angiography or PCI.
During coronary angiography/PCI procedure, assessed up to 3 hours

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Total procedure time
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total procedure time until completion of coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Fluoroscopy time
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total fluoroscopy time measured during coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Radiation exposure
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Cumulative radiation dose assessed by Air Kerma and Dose Area Product (DAP) during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Contrast volume used
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total contrast medium volume used during coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Success rate of loop access per technique
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Successful navigation of radial or brachial artery loops or tortuosity using the assigned technique.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Number of guidewires used
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total number of guidewires used during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Number of catheters used
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Total number of catheters used during coronary angiography or PCI.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Radial artery spasm
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Occurrence of radial artery spasm during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Procedure-related symptoms
Prazo: During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Pain (VAS 0-10), paresthesia, or paresis occurring during the procedure.
During index procedure, assessed up to 3 hours.
Access-site vascular complications
Prazo: From procedure completion until discharge, assessed up to 7 days
Occurrence of post-procedural hematoma (EASY scale), pseudoaneurysm, arterial dissection, or compartment syndrome.
From procedure completion until discharge, assessed up to 7 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Grigorios Tsigkas, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Patras

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

14 de maio de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de maio de 2029

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de novembro de 2029

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

6 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

15 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

16 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

16 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

15 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever