Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Effectiveness of Joint Distraction Versus Passive End Range Overpressure in Osteoarthritis:

14. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Dr Noreen Sher Muhammad, University of Faisalabad

Comparative Effectiveness of Joint Distraction Versus Passive End Range Overpressure in Managing Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Knee osteoarthritis was a common degenerative joint condition that caused pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion, and functional limitations. This study compared two manual therapy techniques: Joint Distraction and Passive Joint End-Range Overpressure. The goal was to determine which technique was more effective at reducing pain, improving knee range of motion, enhancing function, and improving quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either Joint Distraction or Passive Joint End-Range Overpressure for 4 weeks.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This study was a randomized clinical trial. A sample of 26 participants aged 40-60 with Grade 2 or Grade 3 Knee Osteoarthritis was recruited from DHQ Hospital and Madinah Teaching Hospital Faisalabad. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups (n=13 each). Group A received the Joint Distraction Technique involving sustained traction of the knee joint for 20 minutes at the patient's perceived threshold. Group B received Passive Joint End-Range Overpressure involving Maitland Grade IV mobilization for 3 minutes, twice, with a 30-second rest interval. Both groups received a 10-minute hot pack before their respective techniques. Interventions occurred 3 times per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions total). Outcome measures included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Goniometer, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS), measured at baseline and after 4 weeks.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

26

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Punjab Province
      • Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 3800
        • The University of Faisalabad

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with Grade 2 or Grade 3 Knee Osteoarthritis.
  • A Kellgren-Lawrence Grade (KLG) of at least 2.
  • Age between 40-60 years.
  • Knee pain for at least 6 months.
  • A minimum pain score of 3 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Acute inflammation.
  • Total Knee Replacement (TKR) surgery.
  • Any lumbar spine disease (disc herniation or lumbar stenosis).
  • Intra-articular injection.
  • Recent tibia or femur fracture.
  • Any systemic inflammatory arthritic condition or neurological condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or stroke).

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: GROUP A
The joint distraction is the manual approach in knee osteoarthritis. This is very efficient in managing pain, to increase range of motion and reduce stiffness of joint due to osteoarthritis.

The joint distraction is the manual approach in knee osteoarthritis. This is very efficient in managing pain, to increase range of motion and reduce stiffness of joint due to osteoarthritis. A specialized greave would be created to distract the knee joint.

Using a platform beneath the lower leg to create counterpressure, the knee would be put in flexion while sustained traction will be performed for 20 minutes while the patient would be in a supine posture. In each session, the traction would be adjusted to the patients' perceived threshold. The least amount of work that caused patients to get distracted would be employed as a diversion

Experimental: GROUP B
The passive joint end-range overpressure is the technique of Maitland grade IV which is performed passively. End-range Individual Maitland mobilizations were carried out at the tibiofemoral joint.
The passive joint end-range overpressure is the technique of Maitland grade IV which is performed passively. End-range Individual Maitland mobilizations were carried out at the tibiofemoral joint. Depending on the patient's level of pain and tolerance, an oscillatory accessory approach using Grade III or IV was carried out. Patients positioned their knees in their true end range while lying supine on the plinth. The most limited or reproducible knee pain was caused by the accessory approach that was employed. By moving the therapist's body without making any additional movements, the physical contact accurately replicated the hand position of the mobilization. For three minutes, Maitland mobilization was carried out twice at a rate of one oscillation every one or two seconds, with a 30-second break in between

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
pain intensity
Zeitfenster: 4 months

Primary Outcome Measure Pain Tool Used: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the patient's pain level. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10.

0 = No pain 1-3 = Mild pain 4-6 = Moderate pain 7-10 = Severe pain This scale was used to categorize the intensity of pain experienced by patients with knee osteoarthritis.

4 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Quality of Life / Broader Function
Zeitfenster: 4 months

Quality of Life / Broader Function Tool Used: KOOS Questionnaire (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale.

The KOOS questionnaire was used to assess:

Pain Symptoms Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Sport and Recreation Function Knee-related Quality of Life

It contains 42 items divided into five sections:

Pain = 9 items Symptoms = 7 items Activities of Daily Living = 17 items Sport and Recreation Function = 5 items Quality of Life = 4 items

Each item is scored from 0 to 4.

Maximum score:

42 items × 4 = 168

Interpretation (Percentage Based):

< 40% = Extreme disability 40-59% = Severe problems 60-79% = Moderate problems 80-99% = Mild disability This questionnaire evaluates the overall impact of knee osteoarthritis on function and quality of life.4 months

4 months
Disability
Zeitfenster: 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

1) Osteoarthritis Symptoms and Functions Tool Used: WOMAC Questionnaire (Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index)

The WOMAC questionnaire was used to assess:

Pain Stiffness Physical function

It contains 24 items divided into three sections:

Pain = 5 items Stiffness = 2 items Physical Function = 17 items Each question has 5 response options ranging from None to Extreme.

Scoring:

Each item = 0-4 points Pain section total = 20 Stiffness section total = 8 Physical function section total = 68 Total WOMAC score = 96

Interpretation:

0-30 = Mild 31-60 = Moderate 61-96 = Severe The higher the score, the greater the symptoms and functional limitations.

4 months
Passive Range of Motion
Zeitfenster: 4 months

Passive Range of Motion Tool Used: Goniometer

A goniometer was used to assess joint range of motion.

The instrument consists of three parts:

Moving Arm - aligned with the body segment that moves. Stationary Arm - aligned with the body segment that remains stationary. Fulcrum - positioned over the joint being assessed.

The goniometer was used to measure the knee joint's range of motion before and after treatment.

4 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

25. Dezember 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

12. Mai 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

25. Mai 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

23. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

14. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

17. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

17. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

14. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Arthrose

Klinische Studien zur Joint distraction GROUP A

Abonnieren