Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Prospective Study of ProteiOS in Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

18. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Isto Biologics

Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of ProteiOS® Allograft Derived Growth Factor in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating Influx™ ProteiOS®, an allograft-derived growth factor product, in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Participants undergoing 1- to 2-level TLIF (L2-S1) are randomized 2:1 to receive ProteiOS or a control graft (local bone with optional cancellous chip augmentation, no ProteiOS). The primary objective is to determine whether the 12-month interbody fusion rate (assessed by CT using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser classification) with ProteiOS is non-inferior to control, using a 5-percentage-point non-inferiority margin. Patient-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L), safety, and healthcare utilization are also assessed. A separate exploratory cohort at one study site will evaluate the same outcomes in participants undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without ProteiOS, without formal hypothesis testing.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely used technique for degenerative lumbar spine pathology. Prospective, randomized evidence on fusion outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization for ProteiOS in TLIF is currently limited to retrospective data. This study randomizes participants 2:1 to ProteiOS versus a within-category control (standard graft material, no ProteiOS), with central, blinded, independent radiographic review of CT and X-ray fusion outcomes. The primary endpoint is CT-confirmed interbody fusion (BSF-3) at 12 months, tested for non-inferiority (margin = 5 percentage points, assumed fusion rates 95% ProteiOS vs. 89% control, 80% power, one-sided α = 0.025, Farrington-Manning likelihood score method). Secondary endpoints include fusion at 6 and 24 months, X-ray-based interbody and posterolateral fusion assessment (Lenke classification for PLF), patient-reported outcomes at 3, 6, and 24 months, adverse events, and healthcare utilization

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

280

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-75 years, skeletally mature at time of surgery
  • Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented TLIF, with or without posterolateral fusion, as determined by the treating surgeon
  • For the ALIF study site only: degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented ALIF
  • Radiographic evidence of degenerative lumbar disease on CT, MRI, or plain radiograph (decreased disc height, herniated nucleus pulposus, ligamentum flavum/annulus hypertrophy, facet arthrosis/osteophyte, spinal canal or foraminal stenosis, or vertebral translation >3 mm)
  • Symptoms of low back pain, radiculopathy, or neurogenic claudication consistent with radiographic findings
  • Preoperative back pain ≥4 on a 0-10 VAS
  • Preoperative leg pain ≥3 on a 0-10 VAS, consistent with radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication
  • Preoperative ODI score ≥30
  • Failure of ≥6 months non-operative treatment (may be waived for progressive neurological deficit, new/worsening motor weakness, bowel/bladder dysfunction, or cauda equina syndrome)
  • Willing and able to comply with follow-up schedule and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for surgery with synthetic bone grafts containing hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, or other radio-opaque material
  • BMI >40
  • Prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at a level currently scheduled for surgery
  • Malignancy or treatment for malignancy within the last 5 years (benign skin cancer permitted)
  • Osteoporosis/osteopenia (≤2.5 SD below age-matched mean)
  • Use of rhBMP-2 (Infuse) or other active biologics
  • Active or systemic infection, malignancy, or severe metabolic bone disease
  • Chronic steroid use (>10 days)
  • Revision fusion at index levels
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study within 30 days of consent
  • Known pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the study

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: TLIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)
Influx™ demineralized cortical fibers combined 1:1 with ProteiOS®, ≥50% of total graft volume per level (5-15 cc total), optional cancellous allograft chip augmentation. If PLF indicated: 100% cortical fiber graft + ProteiOS + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.
Sonstiges: Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)
Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice
Aktiver Komparator: TLIF - Control
5-15 cc locally harvested autograft, optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation, no ProteiOS. If PLF indicated: cortical fiber graft + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.
Sonstiges: Standard of Care (SOC)
Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation
Experimental: ALIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)
Same ProteiOS-based mixture as TLIF treatment arm
Sonstiges: Allograft-derived growth factor (ProteiOS®)
Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice
Aktiver Komparator: ALIF - Control
Same control graft composition as TLIF control arm
Sonstiges: Standard of Care (SOC)
Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Rate of Fusion Success (via Computed Tomography (CT) analysis)
Zeitfenster: 12 months
Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.
12 months
Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
12 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).
12 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Zeitfenster: 12 Months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
12 Months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Fusion (via Computed Tomography (CT))
Zeitfenster: 6 and 24 months
Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.
6 and 24 months
Fusion (x ray)
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Percentage of participants achieving fusion by X-ray. Interbody fusion (all participants): Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification, Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion); success = Grade 3; higher grade = better.
3, 6, 12, 24 months
Adverse Events
Zeitfenster: 24 months
Nature (descriptive) and frequency (number) of procedure and biologic related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
24 months
Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 24 Months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
3, 6, 24 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 24 Months
Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).
3, 6, 24 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Zeitfenster: 3, 6, 24 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
3, 6, 24 Months
Healthcare utilization: Frequency of Hospital Visits
Zeitfenster: Up to 24 months
Number of hospital visits per participant, up to 24 months.
Up to 24 months
Healthcare Utilization: Length of Hospital Stay
Zeitfenster: Up to 24 months
Duration of hospital stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.
Up to 24 months
Healthcare Utilization: ICU Time
Zeitfenster: Up to 24 Months
Duration of ICU stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.
Up to 24 Months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Isto Biologics

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Dezember 2029

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Januar 2030

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

11. August 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

18. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. August 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

18. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • CS-07

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren