Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Prospective Study of ProteiOS in Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

18 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Isto Biologics

Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of ProteiOS® Allograft Derived Growth Factor in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating Influx™ ProteiOS®, an allograft-derived growth factor product, in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Participants undergoing 1- to 2-level TLIF (L2-S1) are randomized 2:1 to receive ProteiOS or a control graft (local bone with optional cancellous chip augmentation, no ProteiOS). The primary objective is to determine whether the 12-month interbody fusion rate (assessed by CT using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser classification) with ProteiOS is non-inferior to control, using a 5-percentage-point non-inferiority margin. Patient-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, EQ-5D-5L), safety, and healthcare utilization are also assessed. A separate exploratory cohort at one study site will evaluate the same outcomes in participants undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with or without ProteiOS, without formal hypothesis testing.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely used technique for degenerative lumbar spine pathology. Prospective, randomized evidence on fusion outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization for ProteiOS in TLIF is currently limited to retrospective data. This study randomizes participants 2:1 to ProteiOS versus a within-category control (standard graft material, no ProteiOS), with central, blinded, independent radiographic review of CT and X-ray fusion outcomes. The primary endpoint is CT-confirmed interbody fusion (BSF-3) at 12 months, tested for non-inferiority (margin = 5 percentage points, assumed fusion rates 95% ProteiOS vs. 89% control, 80% power, one-sided α = 0.025, Farrington-Manning likelihood score method). Secondary endpoints include fusion at 6 and 24 months, X-ray-based interbody and posterolateral fusion assessment (Lenke classification for PLF), patient-reported outcomes at 3, 6, and 24 months, adverse events, and healthcare utilization

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

280

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-75 years, skeletally mature at time of surgery
  • Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented TLIF, with or without posterolateral fusion, as determined by the treating surgeon
  • For the ALIF study site only: degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (L2-S1) requiring 1-2 level instrumented ALIF
  • Radiographic evidence of degenerative lumbar disease on CT, MRI, or plain radiograph (decreased disc height, herniated nucleus pulposus, ligamentum flavum/annulus hypertrophy, facet arthrosis/osteophyte, spinal canal or foraminal stenosis, or vertebral translation >3 mm)
  • Symptoms of low back pain, radiculopathy, or neurogenic claudication consistent with radiographic findings
  • Preoperative back pain ≥4 on a 0-10 VAS
  • Preoperative leg pain ≥3 on a 0-10 VAS, consistent with radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication
  • Preoperative ODI score ≥30
  • Failure of ≥6 months non-operative treatment (may be waived for progressive neurological deficit, new/worsening motor weakness, bowel/bladder dysfunction, or cauda equina syndrome)
  • Willing and able to comply with follow-up schedule and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for surgery with synthetic bone grafts containing hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, or other radio-opaque material
  • BMI >40
  • Prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at a level currently scheduled for surgery
  • Malignancy or treatment for malignancy within the last 5 years (benign skin cancer permitted)
  • Osteoporosis/osteopenia (≤2.5 SD below age-matched mean)
  • Use of rhBMP-2 (Infuse) or other active biologics
  • Active or systemic infection, malignancy, or severe metabolic bone disease
  • Chronic steroid use (>10 days)
  • Revision fusion at index levels
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study within 30 days of consent
  • Known pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the study

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: TLIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)
Influx™ demineralized cortical fibers combined 1:1 with ProteiOS®, ≥50% of total graft volume per level (5-15 cc total), optional cancellous allograft chip augmentation. If PLF indicated: 100% cortical fiber graft + ProteiOS + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.
Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice
Comparador activo: TLIF - Control
5-15 cc locally harvested autograft, optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation, no ProteiOS. If PLF indicated: cortical fiber graft + local bone in Fibrant PAK containment bag.
Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation
Experimental: ALIF - ProteiOS (Treatment)
Same ProteiOS-based mixture as TLIF treatment arm
Allograft-derived growth factor product (ProteiOS®) containing endogenous osteoinductive, angiogenic, and chemoattractant proteins bound to a scaffold of choice
Comparador activo: ALIF - Control
Same control graft composition as TLIF control arm
Local autograft with optional mineralized cancellous allograft chip augmentation

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Rate of Fusion Success (via Computed Tomography (CT) analysis)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.
12 months
Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
12 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological
Periodo de tiempo: 12 Months
Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).
12 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 Months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain), assessed at 12 months; mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
12 Months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Fusion (via Computed Tomography (CT))
Periodo de tiempo: 6 and 24 months
Percentage of participants achieving fusion success, defined as Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification Grade 3 (solid fusion: trabecular bone bridging across ≥50% of the interbody fusion area) at the treated level(s), assessed by CT scan. BSF is a 3-grade classification ranging from Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion), with higher grade indicating better fusion status.
6 and 24 months
Fusion (x ray)
Periodo de tiempo: 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Percentage of participants achieving fusion by X-ray. Interbody fusion (all participants): Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification, Grade 1 (pseudarthrosis) to Grade 3 (solid fusion); success = Grade 3; higher grade = better.
3, 6, 12, 24 months
Adverse Events
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
Nature (descriptive) and frequency (number) of procedure and biologic related Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
24 months
Patient Reported Outcome: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Periodo de tiempo: 3, 6, 24 Months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg and back pain (range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable; higher score = worse pain); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
3, 6, 24 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Neurological
Periodo de tiempo: 3, 6, 24 Months
Neurological status: Percentage of participants with no new or worsening neurological deficit from baseline, assessed across three components: motor function (Medical Research Council [MRC] grading scale, range 0-5, higher score indicates greater strength), sensory function (graded as intact, diminished, or absent), and deep tendon reflexes (graded as absent, diminished, normal, or hyperreflexic).
3, 6, 24 Months
Patient Reported Outcome: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Periodo de tiempo: 3, 6, 24 Months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a 10-item questionnaire assessing functional disability due to low back pain (raw score converted to a percentage, range 0-100%; 0 = no disability, 100 = maximum disability; higher score = worse disability); mean scores compared between treatment and control arms.
3, 6, 24 Months
Healthcare utilization: Frequency of Hospital Visits
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 24 months
Number of hospital visits per participant, up to 24 months.
Up to 24 months
Healthcare Utilization: Length of Hospital Stay
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 24 months
Duration of hospital stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.
Up to 24 months
Healthcare Utilization: ICU Time
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 24 Months
Duration of ICU stay per participant, in days, up to 24 months.
Up to 24 Months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2029

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2030

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

11 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de agosto de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

20 de agosto de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

20 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir