Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft for Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Defects

21. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Merve Atak, Ankara University

Clinical, Histological, Biomolecular, and Ultrasonographic Analysis of the Efficacy of a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix Versus an Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Soft-Tissue Defects

Peri-implant soft-tissue defects will be treated with either a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX; test group) or an autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG; control group) following implant placement in patients with a single missing tooth. After a mid-crestal incision and full-thickness flap elevation, the graft material will be positioned over the crest beneath the buccal flap and stabilized, followed by tension-free primary closure. Peri-implant soft-tissue thickness, echo intensity, and vascularization will be assessed non-invasively using high-resolution intraoral ultrasonography and Power Doppler imaging. Clinical periodontal parameters and patient-reported outcomes, including pain perception (visual analog scale), swelling, fatigue, analgesic consumption, and wound healing, will be recorded. These outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and on the 1st week, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months. At the 6th month, gingival biopsy samples obtained during healing abutment placement will be evaluated histologically and immunohistochemically (CD11c, CD163, COL1, COL3, MMP-1, TIMP-1) to compare the biological integration of the two graft materials.

Studienübersicht

Status

Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Adequate peri-implant soft-tissue thickness is important for both esthetic outcomes and the long-term maintenance of peri-implant health, as thin mucosa has been associated with increased marginal bone loss. Although the autogenous connective tissue graft is considered the gold standard for soft-tissue augmentation, it entails disadvantages such as the need for a second surgical site and donor-site morbidity. The volume-stable collagen matrix has been proposed as an alternative that eliminates the need for a donor site; however, comparative data based on ultrasonographic, histological, and immunohistochemical evidence remain limited. This study aims to compare VCMX and CTG using a multidimensional approach.

The study is designed as a single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial to be conducted at the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University. Participants meeting the eligibility criteria will be allocated to the test (VCMX) and control (CTG) groups. All surgical and clinical procedures will be performed according to standardized protocols, and all data will be recorded prospectively.

The evaluation will adopt a multidimensional methodological approach: the assessment of quantitative data obtained by high-resolution intraoral ultrasonography (soft-tissue thickness, vascularization, and echo intensity) together with histological and immunohistochemical findings constitutes the novel aspect of this study. The primary outcome will be the change in ultrasonographic soft-tissue thickness, whereas the secondary outcomes will comprise vascularization, echo intensity, clinical periodontal parameters, patient-reported outcomes, and the histological/immunohistochemical evaluation of graft integration. In this way, the two graft materials will be compared not only in terms of dimensional gain but also with respect to biological integration and tissue quality.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

22

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

  • Türkei (türkiye)
    • Yeni̇mahalle
      • Ankara, Yeni̇mahalle, Türkei (türkiye), 06560
        • Rekrutierung
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Periodontal health confirmed according to the 2017 World Workshop criteria (BOP <10%, PD ≤3 mm, absence of gingival inflammation, and good oral hygiene) (Tonetti et al., 2018)
  • Requirement of implant placement and soft-tissue augmentation for a single missing tooth in the anterior region
  • Bleeding on probing <30% at the adjacent teeth (Thoma et al., 2016)
  • Compliance with the study protocol and follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Siebert Class II or Class III defects
  • History of surgery at the treated site
  • Untreated periodontitis or peri-implantitis
  • Current smoking or smoking within the previous five years
  • Systemic conditions (that may impair healing)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Allergy to the materials/drugs used
  • Drug use affecting mucosal healing
  • History of antibiotic therapy within the previous six months

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: VCMX Group
Soft-tissue augmentation will be performed using a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX). Under local anesthesia, a mid-crestal incision combined with sulcular incisions will be made, and a full-thickness flap will be elevated with periosteal releasing incisions to eliminate tension. Implants will be placed according to prosthetic and surgical principles and covered with a cover screw. The VCMX (15×20×3 mm) will be trimmed to the defect size, positioned over the crest beneath the buccal flap, and stabilized with simple interrupted sutures (6-0 polypropylene). Tension-free primary flap closure will be achieved with simple interrupted sutures (5-0 polypropylene).
Gerät: Volume-stable collagen matrix
A volume-stable porcine-derived collagen matrix (15×20×3 mm) will be trimmed to the defect size, placed over the crest beneath the buccal flap, and stabilized with simple interrupted sutures (6-0 polypropylene) to augment peri-implant soft-tissue thickness. (test group)
Aktiver Komparator: CTG Group
Soft-tissue augmentation will be performed using an autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG). Under local anesthesia, a mid-crestal incision combined with sulcular incisions will be made, and a full-thickness flap will be elevated with periosteal releasing incisions to eliminate tension. Implants will be placed according to prosthetic and surgical principles and covered with a cover screw. A CTG harvested using the extraoral de-epithelialization technique will be positioned over the crest beneath the buccal flap and stabilized with simple interrupted sutures (6-0 polypropylene). Tension-free primary flap closure will be achieved with simple interrupted sutures (5-0 polypropylene).
Verfahren: Connective tissue graft
An autogenous connective tissue graft harvested from the palate using the extraoral de-epithelialization technique will be placed over the crest beneath the buccal flap and stabilized with simple interrupted sutures (6-0 polypropylene) to augment peri-implant soft-tissue thickness. (control group)

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
peri-implant soft-tissue thickness
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Peri-implant buccal soft-tissue thickness will be measured non-invasively using high-resolution intraoral ultrasonography (LOGIQ P10 XDClear R4.5, GE Healthcare) with an L8-18i-RS high-frequency linear "hockey-stick" probe (8 MHz). Measurements will be repeated preoperatively (baseline) and postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. On static B-mode images, linear soft-tissue thickness will be assessed at three levels 1.5, 3, and 5 mm apical to the alveolar crest margin and recorded in millimeters by a single calibrated examiner blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome is the change in linear soft-tissue thickness from baseline to 6 months, compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Peri-implant soft-tissue vascularization
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Peri-implant soft-tissue perfusion will be evaluated using Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) with the same unit and probe, preoperatively (baseline) and postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Quantitative analysis will use the device's integrated Color Quantification (CQ) module: a circular region of interest (ROI) 6 mm in diameter (area 28.274 mm²), originating from the alveolar crest margin, will be defined. Within this ROI, the proportion of colored (Power Doppler) pixels representing blood flow relative to the total number of pixels will be calculated to obtain a semi-quantitative Power Doppler pixel density . The outcome is the change in pixel density from baseline to 6 months, compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Ultrasonographic echo intensity of peri-implant soft tissue
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Tissue echogenicity will be evaluated preoperatively (baseline) and postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months from static B-mode images obtained with the probe positioned longitudinally over the mid-buccal region of the edentulous site. Echo intensity will be measured in decibels (dB) using the unit's grayscale (echo-intensity) function. The ROI will extend 7 mm apically from the soft-tissue margin. As the device references echo intensity to the system's saturation level, soft-tissue reflections yield negative dB values; less negative values indicate higher echogenicity (denser, more organized tissue), and more negative values indicate hypoechoic/less dense tissue. Measurements will be performed by a single calibrated, blinded examiner, with intra-examiner reliability assessed beforehand. The outcome is the change in echo intensity from baseline to 6 months, compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Postoperative pain
Zeitfenster: 1 week
Patient-rated pain intensity at 1 week, recorded on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) anchored at 0 (no pain) and 10 (most severe pain). Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
1 week
Postoperative swelling
Zeitfenster: 1 week
Patient-rated swelling at 1 week on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no swelling) to 10 (most severe). Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
1 week
Postoperative fatigue
Zeitfenster: 1 week
Patient-rated fatigue at 1 week on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (most severe). Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups
1 week
Number of analgesic tablets consumed
Zeitfenster: 1 week
Total number of analgesic tablets taken during the first postoperative week, recorded by patient self-report. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
1 week
Early wound healing (Wound Healing Index, WHI)
Zeitfenster: 1 week
Early wound healing at 1 week scored with the Wound Healing Index (Huang et al., 2005) based on edema, erythema, discomfort, flap dehiscence, and suppuration, from 1 (uneventful healing) to 3 (poor healing). Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
1 week
Soft-tissue appearance
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Soft-tissue appearance at 6 months graded with the Aichelmann-Reidy et al. (2001) tissue-appearance system across five parameters (tissue consistency, contour, color match, scar formation, and integration with adjacent tissue), each scored against predefined criteria and summed into a total appearance score. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
Patient satisfaction with appearance
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of participants rating the appearance of the treated site as "satisfactory" versus "not satisfactory" at 6 months. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
Patient satisfaction with experience
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of participants rating their treatment experience as "satisfactory" versus "not satisfactory" at 6 months. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
Histomorphological evaluation
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Descriptive light-microscopic evaluation (hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome) of tissue architecture, integrity and cellular organization, extracellular matrix organization, and the presence of necrosis, edema, hemorrhage, inflammation, foreign-body reaction, and fibrosis.
6 months
Microvascular density
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of vessels counted in the superficial connective tissue at x400 magnification (single field = 0.237 mm²) across three consecutive fields, averaged per specimen. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
CD163
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of CD163-positive cells counted at x400 magnification (single field = 0.237 mm²) across three hot-spot fields, averaged per specimen. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
CD11c
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of CD11c-positive cells counted at x400 magnification (single field = 0.237 mm²) across three hot-spot fields, averaged per specimen. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
TIMP-1
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of TIMP-1 positive cells counted at x400 magnification (single field = 0.237 mm²) across three hot-spot fields, averaged per specimen. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
MMP-1
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Number of MMP-1 positive cells counted at x400 magnification (single field = 0.237 mm²) across three hot-spot fields, averaged per specimen. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
Collagen I
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Immunohistochemical Collagen I staining, quantified as the percentage of positively stained area relative to the total microscopic field area. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months
Collagen III
Zeitfenster: 6 months
Immunohistochemical Collagen III staining, quantified as the percentage of positively stained area relative to the total microscopic field area. Compared between the VCMX and CTG groups.
6 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ankara University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

18. Dezember 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. September 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. September 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

14. August 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

21. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. August 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

21. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. August 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • İ03-222-25
  • TSA-2025-4380 (Andere Zuschuss-/Finanzierungsnummer: Ankara University Scientific Research Projects Unit)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren