Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

A School Program for Children Exposed to Violence

28 de abril de 2014 actualizado por: LIsa Jaycox, RAND
This study will develop a program to help school children deal with violence-related trauma.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

The number of children who have been indirectly or directly exposed to violence has dramatically increased in the last decade. The emotional and behavioral consequences of violence exposure can be particularly devastating to children. Interventions are needed that can reduce symptoms related to traumas already experienced and enhance children's skills for handling extreme stress that might be experienced in the future. The Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBITS) program was developed between 1998 and 2001 to help children in the Los Angeles school district deal with traumatic events. Although promising, the program required a school-based mental health clinician for implementation. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of a program adapted for the Los Angeles CBITS program that can be used by school staff in a middle school setting. The adapted CBITS program will be compared to a wait list to determine which is more effective in reducing trauma-related stress and depression among sixth grade students.

Students who have experienced violence-related trauma will be randomly assigned to receive either 10 weekly sessions of group cognitive behavioral therapy or to wait 3 months. Self-report scales and interviews will be used to assess the emotional states of participants at study entry and study completion. No follow-up visits will be required.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

78

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos, 90017
        • LAUSD Crisis Counseling and Intervention Services, LAUSD/RAND/UCLA Trauma Services Adaptation Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

10 años a 14 años (Niño)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students in 6th and 7th grade in two participating Los Angeles area schools
  • Exposure to severe violence, as either a victim or witness, within 1 year prior to study entry
  • Have symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder at study entry
  • Able to speak and understand English
  • Parent or guardian willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms that are not related to a traumatic event
  • Mental retardation
  • Conduct disorder that would interfere with the participant's ability to engage in group therapy

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: School-based cognitive behavioral support group
Ten group lessons facilitated by a teacher or school counselor that focuses on psycho-education, development of a trauma narrative, approaching trauma-related situations, social problem solving, and cognitive skills.
Otros nombres:
  • Support for Students Exposed to Trauma (SSET)
Sin intervención: Wait-list control group
Waiting list

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms
Periodo de tiempo: Symptoms over the past two weeks were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).
We used the Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS; Foa,Treadwell, Johnson, & Feeny, 2001), to assess PTSD symptoms for both screening into the program and for use in examining child outcomes over time. This scale has been used in school aged children as young as 8 and has shown good convergent and discriminant validity and high reliability (Foa et al., 2001). In our earlier work, scale internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89; Jaycox et al., 2002). In this study, we use it as a continuous scale as designed, and also use cut-points to determine eligibility for the study as in prior work (Kataoka et al., 2003; Stein et al., 2003), requiring a total score of 11 or greater, indicating moderate levels of current PTSD symptoms. A high score indicates more symptoms, and total scores can range from 0 to 51.
Symptoms over the past two weeks were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).
Depressive Symptoms
Periodo de tiempo: Symptoms over the past two weeks were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).
Children's Depression Inventory (CDI; Kovacs, 1981) This 27-item measure assesses children's cognitive, affective, and behavioral depressive symptoms. The scale has high internal consistency, moderate test-retest reliability, and correlates in the expected direction with measures of related constructs (e.g., self-esteem, negative attributions, and hopelessness; Kendall, Cantwell, & Kazdin, 1989). Normative data are available (Finch, Saylor, & Edwards, 1985). We used a 26-item version of the scale that omits an item about suicidal ideation. Higher scores indicate more symptoms, and total scores can range from 0 to 52.
Symptoms over the past two weeks were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).
Parent Report of Behavioral Problems
Periodo de tiempo: Problems over the prior month were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Parent Report, and Teacher Report (SDQ, Goodman, 1997; Goodman, Meltzer, & Bailey, 1998) This questionnaire contains 25 items, 20 assessing problem areas (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and peer relationship problems), 5 assessing prosocial behavior, and items that tap functional impairment related to these problems (Goodman, 1999). Higher scores indicate more problems, with total scores for problem areas ranging from 0 to 40.
Problems over the prior month were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).
Teacher Report of Behavior Problems
Periodo de tiempo: Problems over the month were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Parent Report, and Teacher Report (SDQ, Goodman, 1997; Goodman, Meltzer, & Bailey, 1998) This questionnaire contains 25 items, 20 assessing problem areas (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, and peer relationship problems), 5 assessing prosocial behavior, and items that tap functional impairment related to these problems (Goodman, 1999). Higher scores indicates more problems, with total problem area scores ranging from 0 to 40.
Problems over the month were assessed at baseline, after intervention for the SSET group (10 weeks), and after all receive intervention (20 weeks).

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Lisa H. Jaycox, PhD, RAND

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de julio de 2005

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de julio de 2007

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de julio de 2009

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

29 de noviembre de 2005

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de noviembre de 2005

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

1 de diciembre de 2005

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

22 de mayo de 2014

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2014

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2014

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • R01MH072591 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • DDTR B3-PDS (Otro identificador: FDAAA)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

3
Suscribir