Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Self-Management to Prevent Ulcers in Veterans With SCI (Spinal Cord Injury)

6 de abril de 2015 actualizado por: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Self-Management to Prevent Ulcers in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury

Pressure ulcers (PrUs) are the most frequent significant medical complication after spinal cord injury (SCI). PrU prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates are high, and most persons with SCI will have at least one serious PrU during their lifetime. VA costs of treating the almost 3,500 unique Veterans with SCI and a severe ulcer at an SCI Center in FY10 was just under $400 million.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Background:

Pressure ulcers (PrUs) are the most frequent significant medical complication after spinal cord injury (SCI). PrU prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates are high, and most persons with SCI will have at least one serious PrU during their lifetime. VA costs of treating the almost 3,500 unique Veterans with SCI and a severe ulcer at an SCI Center in 2010 was just under $400 million.

Objectives:

The primary objective of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to determine whether a multi-component self-management (SM) intervention increases the use of skin-protective behaviors and reduces skin worsening in Veterans with SCI, compared to an education control (ED) intervention. Secondary outcomes included PrU knowledge, self-management skills, communication with providers, self-efficacy, community integration and days on bedrest. Another objective was to conduct focus group interviews with patients and providers and to analyze transcripts of SM group sessions to determine barriers and facilitators with regard to spinal cord injury and pressure ulcer prevention.

Methods:

This was a multi-site efficacy intervention study with a single blind prospective randomized design. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and key variables. Supplemental focus group interviews were conducted with patients with SCI (n=35) and SCI providers (n=39). Focus group interviews and SM group calls were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using constant comparative techniques.

Study participants included Veterans hospitalized for Stage III/IV PrUs at or below the level of injury, from six VA SCI Centers around the country (Long Beach, Houston, Milwaukee, Augusta, Hines and St. Louis). Prior to discharge, PrU risk factors were identified and 1:1 PrU education was provided. Randomization and the behavioral interventions began at discharge. The number of randomized subjects were 72 in the ED group and 72 in the SM group (n=144). The analytic sample included subjects with complete data (n=92).

The intervention included 8 site coordinator-initiated calls using didactic (ED) or Motivational Interviewing (MI) strategies to address PrU risk factors. The second component included telephone group calls that included either didactic information about SCI or SM skills including: 1) knowledge about the medical condition; 2) self-monitoring; 3) problem-solving skills; 4) skill for managing the effects of the condition; 5) adherence to necessary health behaviors; and 6) self-advocacy with health care providers. ED subjects received general health information and were not instructed in any specific problem solving, self-monitoring or SM techniques. The ED intervention was comparable to the SM with respect to natural history/ time, dosing, measurement processes, attention, therapeutic alliance, social support, and in receiving a manualized treatment with specific therapist procedures. Self-reported outcome data were obtained by phone at 3 and 6 months, and from mailed photos of study ulcers.

Status:

Study is complete. Additional analyses are ongoing and future manuscripts are planned.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

144

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • California
      • Long Beach, California, Estados Unidos, 90822
        • VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 30904
        • Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, GA
    • Illinois
      • Hines, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 60141-5000
        • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, Estados Unidos, 77030
        • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 53295-1000
        • Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 18 years of age,
  • SCI of at least six month's duration,
  • hospitalized for a Stage III or IV PrU,
  • cognitively intact,
  • available for telephone follow-up, and
  • discharged to a community setting or able to direct own care.

Exclusion Criteria:

We excluded patients with a terminal diagnosis, severe psychiatric comorbidities (eg, current psychosis), cognitive impairments that limited their ability to consent or participate, severe hearing loss, and wounds not expected to heal. People discharged to nursing homes unable to direct their own care were also excluded.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: SM+MI
Self Management (SM) + Motivational Interviewing (MI). Self Management and Motivational Interviewing (SM+MI) participants were assigned to both a self-management and motivational interview group. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based form of counseling to help individuals to engage in behavior change. Self Management (SM) consists of: 1) on-site decisional support to promote provider adherence to ulcer management guidelines, 2) enhanced, interactive PrU education, 3) chronic disease self-management skill building via telephone based groups, 4) proactive care management using MI to support ongoing self-management activities, and 5) distance technology.
Self Management (SM) consists of: 1) on-site decisional support to promote provider adherence to ulcer management guidelines, 2) enhanced, interactive PrU education, 3) chronic disease self-management skill building via telephone based groups, 4) proactive care management using MI to support ongoing self-management activities, and 5) distance technology.
Self Management and Motivational Interviewing (SM+MI) participants were assigned to both a self-management and motivational interview group. An education control intervention (ED) designed to be a credible intervention that is comparable to the SM will control for potential effects of natural history/time, treatment dosing, measurement processes, attention, the non-specific effects of therapeutic alliance, social support, and of receiving a manualized treatment with specific therapist procedures.
Comparador activo: ED
Education (ED). An education control intervention (ED) designed to be a credible intervention that is comparable to the SM will control for potential effects of natural history/time, treatment dosing, measurement processes, attention, the non-specific effects of therapeutic alliance, social support, and of receiving a manualized treatment with specific therapist procedures. The ED intervention will differ only in that subjects will not be instructed in any specific problem solving, self-monitoring, or SM techniques, with the exception of encouraging them to become informed consumers of SCI care.
The ED intervention differs only in that subjects will not be instructed in any specific problem solving, self-monitoring, or SM techniques, with the exception of encouraging them to become informed consumers of SCI care.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percent of Possible Self-Reported Skin Care Behaviors
Periodo de tiempo: Admission (Baseline), 3 months, 6 months

Skin Behavior Change was calculated as the percentage of Self-Reported Behavior at 3 and 6 months (minus the percentage at baseline).

The study reported the number of guideline-recommended skin care behaviors, assessed by the Skin Care Behavior Checklist, a self-reported measure of adherence to 8 guideline recommended skin care behaviors. The average percentage of the 8 behaviors adhered to for each participant was measured by intervention arms at admission (baseline), 3 and 6 months post-discharge.

Admission (Baseline), 3 months, 6 months
Skin Behavior Change
Periodo de tiempo: Admission (Baseline), 3 months, 6 months

Self-reported improvement in skin care behaviors in the SM+MI versus ED control intervention arms.

The study reported the number of guideline-recommended skin care behaviors, assessed by the Skin Care Behavior Checklist, a self-report measure of adherence to 8 skin care behaviors for each participant.The difference in the average percentage of the 8 behaviors adhered to by each participant was measured for the different intervention arms from admission (baseline) to 3 and 6 months post-discharge.

Admission (Baseline), 3 months, 6 months
Any Skin Worsening
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
Skin worsening was defined as when a participant with an open wound at the time of discharge is found to have >20% wound area at 3 or 6 months post-discharge (including new wounds and reopened wounds). Worsening was also defined as a when a participant with a closed wound at discharge is found to have a new or reopened wound at 3 or 6 months post-discharge.
6 months
Skin Status
Periodo de tiempo: Admission (Baseline), 3 months, 6 months
Skin worsening was defined as when a participant with an open wound at the time of discharge is found to have >20% wound area at 3 or 6 months post-discharge (including new wounds and reopened wounds). Worsening was also defined as a when a participant with a closed wound at discharge is found to have a new or reopened wound at 3 or 6 months post-discharge.
Admission (Baseline), 3 months, 6 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Mean Number of Skin-related Admissions
Periodo de tiempo: Discharge to end of study (6 months)
Post-discharge skin-related hospitalizations were for both groups (SM+MI vs. ED) but not as study-related or as an adverse event. This study examined an outpatient intervention during which rehospitalization could be triggered by the participants' early reporting of skin breakdown.
Discharge to end of study (6 months)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Marylou Guihan, PhD MA BA, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de noviembre de 2008

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de junio de 2011

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de diciembre de 2011

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de septiembre de 2008

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de septiembre de 2008

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

30 de septiembre de 2008

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

27 de abril de 2015

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de abril de 2015

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2014

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Self Management (SM)

3
Suscribir