Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

10 de diciembre de 2019 actualizado por: VA Connecticut Healthcare System

Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Management in Military Veterans

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among Veterans is a condition that imparts a great burden to the patient in terms of serious co-morbidities and results in a great cost to the VA Health Care System to treat the co-morbidities, which include heart disease, stroke and neuropsychiatric disorders. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is used to treat sleep apnea and studies have shown a poor adherence to treatment. The investigators hypothesize that using wireless technology will lead to early detection of problems of treatment use and will translate into early remedial action which will improve the use and effectiveness of treatment. The investigators will compare two methods. Usual care involves downloading data from PAP machines at designated 3-month intervals, requiring a face-to-face clinician visit. Wireless care involved more frequent monitoring and intervention in the event of anomalies in treatment use or effectiveness.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Prior to enrollment, patients were seen by a clinician at the Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital in West Haven, Connecticut. Either a facility-based diagnostic polysomnogram or unattended home sleep testing was performed at the evaluating clinician's discretion. Clinicians that saw the patient determined whether PAP therapy was needed, and either auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or set pressures of CPAP were ordered for the patient. Patients received education about OSA and about their equipment from a respiratory therapist and physician's assistant within the VA who then provided the equipment for them. Patients coming to this internal Durable Medical Equipment (DME) provider were screened for participation in the study.The study was overseen by the Institutional Review Board at the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care in West Haven, Connecticut. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Patients were included in the study if they were diagnosed with OSA (defined as AHI or apnea-hypopnea index greater than five per hour with symptoms, or AHI greater than 15/hour), and if they were being exposed to PAP for the first time. Patients who were previously treated with PAP, had central apnea, chronic respiratory failure, recent in-patient hospital admissions (=< 2 weeks), or were living outside cellular network coverage area were excluded from the study.

Patients that met study inclusion criteria were provided ResMed S9 devices with wireless modems. Their usage and treatment data was tracked using EasyCare Online, a cloud-based system for the ResMed devices. After the initial setup and educational settings, the patients received supplies as needed and troubleshooting of side effects of treatment as needed. Devices were not removed after 3 months if they were not adherent.

Patients in the usual care group were monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with scheduling face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data were only assessed by the clinician at these intervals.

Patients in the wireless care group were monitored more frequently using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.

We then determined adherence using CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) criteria at 3 months, and at 12 months. To obtain this data, we evaluated whether the PAP devices were used for 4 or more hours per night on 70% of nights during a consecutive 30-day period anytime during the first 3 months of initial use, and then a consecutive 30-day period in months 4-12. We also examined the daily use from the first to last day looking of overall patterns of utilization monthly, quarterly, semiannually and annually. Data was collected and maintained in a REDCap database (REDCap is a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases). Sensitivity and specificity calculations were then performed to evaluate predictability of adherence at 1 year using adherence at 3 months. Fisher's exact test was also used to evaluate the association between adherence at 3 months and 1 year and the association between AHI (Apnea -Hypopnea Index) and adherence.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

52

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, Estados Unidos, 06516
        • VA Connecticut Health System

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 90 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed OSA patients
  • AHI of 5/hour or greater
  • Prescribed CPAP therapy
  • Able to comply with treatment and understand treatment instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to understand study requirements
  • Significant cardiorespiratory disease - e.g. COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), severe CHF (congestive heart failure)
  • Clinical instability at time of apnea diagnosis
  • Prescribed BiPap (bilevel positive airway pressure) or ASV (Adaptive Support Ventilation), which are other types of PAP

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Usual Care
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits:These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with scheduling face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with scheduling face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Comparador activo: Wireless Care
Frequent remote monitoring:These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy and follow-up phone calls

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months
Periodo de tiempo: First 3 months
Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence defined as mean PAP use being > 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights.
First 3 months
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months
Periodo de tiempo: 4-12 Months
Demonstrated Periodic Adherence After 3 Months of Treatment During 4-12 months defined as mean PAP use being > 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights
4-12 Months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
Evaluate whether patients are effectively being treated with PAP or with alternate means of treatment for OSA (obstructive sleep apnea) at the end of 12 months.
12 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Meir Kryger, MD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de enero de 2014

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de diciembre de 2016

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

30 de agosto de 2012

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de septiembre de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

5 de septiembre de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de diciembre de 2019

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de diciembre de 2019

Última verificación

1 de diciembre de 2019

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir