Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Fampridine-Sustained Release (SR) for the Treatment of Spasticity Resulting From Spinal Cord Injury

27 de julio de 2017 actualizado por: Acorda Therapeutics

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 12-Week Parallel Group Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Oral Fampridine-SR in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Spasticity Resulting From Chronic, Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Normally, nerve fibers carry electrical impulses through the spinal cord, providing communication between the brain and the arms and legs. In people with spinal cord injury, some fibers may be destroyed at the site of injury, while others remain connected but do not work correctly to carry electrical impulses. As a result, subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury may have spasticity which is muscle spasms or muscle stiffness that makes movement difficult. Fampridine-SR is an experimental drug that increases the ability of the nerve to conduct electrical impulses. This study will examine the effects of Fampridine-SR on moderate to severe lower-limb spasticity, as well as the effects on bodily functions such as bladder control, bowel function and sexual function. The study will also examine the possible risks of taking Fampridine-SR.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

204

Fase

  • Fase 3

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canadá, R3A 1M4
        • Health Sciences Centre
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canadá, L8N 3Z5
        • Chedoke-McMaster Hospital
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canadá, K7L 5A2
        • St. Mary's of the Lake Hospital
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Estados Unidos, 35233
        • UAB School of Medicine, 190 Spain Rehab Center
    • California
      • Long Beach, California, Estados Unidos, 90822
        • Long Beach VA Medical Center
      • Sacramento, California, Estados Unidos, 95817
        • University of California, Davis
      • San Jose, California, Estados Unidos, 95128
        • Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80110
        • Craig Hospital
    • Connecticut
      • New Britain, Connecticut, Estados Unidos, 06503
        • Hospital for Special Care
    • Illinois
      • Hines, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 60141
        • Hines VA Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02118
        • Boston University Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48109
        • University of Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48201
        • Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, Estados Unidos, 55417
        • Minneapolis VA Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, Estados Unidos, 65212
        • University of Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, Estados Unidos, 63104
        • St. Louis University
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, Estados Unidos, 14642
        • University of Rochester/Strong Memorial Hospital
      • Syracuse, New York, Estados Unidos, 13045
        • SUNY Upstate Clinical Trials Office
      • West Haverstraw, New York, Estados Unidos, 13045
        • Helen Hayes Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Estados Unidos, 28203
        • Charlotte Institute of Rehabilitation
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, Estados Unidos, 28402
        • Coastal AHEC
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 43210
        • Ohio State University
      • Dayton, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 45409
        • Miami Valley Hospital- Rehabilitation Institute of Medicine
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Estados Unidos, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, Estados Unidos, 75216
        • VA North Texas Health Care System
      • Dallas, Texas, Estados Unidos, 75390
        • Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, Estados Unidos, 22042
        • INOVA Institute of Research and Education
      • Richmond, Virginia, Estados Unidos, 23298
        • Medical College of Virginia/VCU
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center, Dept. of Rehabilitation
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Estados Unidos, 53295
        • Wood VA Medical Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 70 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (at least 18 months prior and stable for 6 months)
  • Moderate to severe lower-limb spasticity
  • Able to give informed consent and willing to comply with protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of seizures
  • Existing or history of frequent Urinary Tract Infections
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse
  • Allergy to pyridine-containing substances
  • Received a botox injection 4 months prior to study
  • Received an investigational drug within 30 days
  • Previously treated with 4-aminopyridine (4-AP)
  • Not on stable medication dosing in 3 weeks prior to study
  • Abnormal ECG or laboratory value at screening

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador de placebos: Placebo
Placebo
Comparador activo: fampridina-SR 50mg/día
25 mg bid (dos veces al día)

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Double-blind Change From Baseline in Ashworth Score Evaluating Spasticity
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

The Ashworth evaluates the functioning of two lower extremity muscle groups, the hamstring and quadriceps muscles, while in the supine position. The test measures extension of the right and left hamstring muscle and flexion of the right and left quadriceps muscle using the following 5-point grading scale:

1=no increased tone; 2=slight increase in tone, giving a "catch" when the affected part is moved in flexion or extension; 3=more marked increase in tone, but affected part is easily flexed; 4=considerable increase in tone, passive movement is difficult; 5=affected part is rigid in flexion and extension.

The Ashworth Score was determined by adding all individual scores for each muscle group and dividing by four. Higher Ashworth Scores indicated greater spasticity.

Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98
Double-blind Change From Baseline in Mean Subject's Global Impression (SGI) Scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

The SGI is a 7-unit ordinal scale used by the subject to evaluate the effects of study medication on his/her quality of life during the preceding week, with higher scores denoting greater satisfaction. A positive change score in SGI signifies improved outcome.

The questionnaire consisted of one question (How do you feel about the effects of the investigational drug over the past 7 days?). The answer was based on a numerical rating scale where 1=terrible; 2=unhappy; 3=mostly dissatisfied; 4=neutral/mixed; 5=mostly satisfied; 6=pleased; 7=delighted.

Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Double-blind Change From Baseline in Mean Spasm Frequency/Severity Scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

The Spasm Frequency score is the average rating by the clinician of the left and right arm(s) and leg(s), each evaluated on a 4-point scale (from 0=no spasms to 4=spontaneous spasms occurring more than ten times per hour), with higher scores denoting a greater degree of muscle spasms.

The Spasm Severity score is the average rating of the left and right arm(s) and leg(s), each evaluated on a three-point scale (mild, moderate, or severe) as rated by the clinician on the basis of patient self-report.

On both, a negative change in score signifies improvement in muscle spasms. The average Spasm Frequency/Spasm Severity Score was calculated as the average of the left and right non-missing scores.

Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98
Double-blind Change From Baseline in Mean Clinician's Global Impression (CGI) Scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visits 2,3) average of days 7-14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average of days 28-98)
The supervising clinician rated the patient's neurological condition following treatment as compared to the screening visit on a seven-point scale (from 1=very much improved to 7=very much worse). The assessment was based on the clinician's overall impression of the patient's neurological status (specifically bowel, bladder, and sexual function; spasticity; and other neurological functions) and general state of health related to his or her participation in the study. Negative change scores indicated a change for the better.
Baseline (visits 2,3) average of days 7-14 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average of days 28-98)
Stable-dose Change From Baseline in Mean American Spinal Injury Association(ASIA) Total Motor Score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and stable-dose treatment period (visits 5-7) average score days 56-98
Ten key muscle groups for the right and left sides were rated on a 0 (absent) to 5 (normal) scale, with a possible total score of 100. Higher positive change scores indicate improved motor function.
Baseline (visits 2,3) average score days 7,14 and stable-dose treatment period (visits 5-7) average score days 56-98
Change From Baseline in Mean International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and stable treatment period (visit 7) average score day 98

Male patients were asked to complete the IIEF questionnaire on sexual function. The IIEF is a brief, reliable, and valid self-administered questionnaire of 15 questions (items) that were categorized into five domains: Erectile Function (EF) scores: 0-6 Severe dysfunction, 7-12 Moderate dysfunction, 13-18 Mild to moderate dysfunction, 19-24 Mild dysfunction, 25-30 No dysfunction. Orgasmic Function (OF) score range: 0-2 Severe dysfunction to 9-10 No dysfunction, Sexual Desire (SD) score range: 0-2 Severe dysfunction to 9-10 No dysfunction, Intercourse Satisfaction (IS) score range: 0-3 Severe dysfunction to 13-15 No dysfunction, and Overall Satisfaction (OS) score range: 0-2 Severe dysfunction to 9-10 No dysfunction.

Domain scores were derived by summing the individual items within a given domain. Final scale ranges from 0 (negative) to 5 (positive). A positive change in IIEF domain scores signifies improvement.

Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and stable treatment period (visit 7) average score day 98
Change From Baseline in Mean Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) Scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and stable treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

The FSFI is a brief, reliable, and valid self-administered questionnaire of 19 questions (items). It contains six domains: Desire (2 items score range: 1 Very low or none at all to 5 Very high), Arousal (4 items score range: 0 No sexual activity to 5 Almost always or always), Lubrication (4 items score range: 0 No sexual activity to 5 Almost always or always), Orgasm (3 items score range: 0 No sexual activity to 5 Almost always or always), Satisfaction (3 items score range: 0 No sexual activity to 5 Very satisfied) and Pain (3 items score range: 0 Did not attempt intercourse to 5 Almost never or never).

A positive change signifies improvement.

Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and stable treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98
Adjusted Mean Change in Subject Bladder/Bowel Function Diary Scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

Bowel/bladder questions pertaining to the average number of times per day the patient experienced accidental urination/leakage and the average number of bowel movements per day were asked of all patients daily.

A negative change in patient bladder/bowel function diary score signifies improvement.

Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98
Adjusted Mean Change in Subject Bowel Function Diary Scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

Bowel questions pertaining to the average number of minutes per day spent on bowel routine were asked of all patients daily.

A negative change in patient bowel function diary score signifies improvement.

Baseline (visit 1) average score obtained at day 1 and double-blind treatment period (visits 4-7) average score days 28-98

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Andrew Blight, MD, Acorda Therapeutics

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de junio de 2002

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2003

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2004

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

24 de agosto de 2012

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de septiembre de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

12 de septiembre de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

25 de agosto de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de julio de 2017

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2014

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

3
Suscribir