Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Pre-stroke Cognitive Status and Thrombolytic Therapy (OPHELIE-COG)

26 de octubre de 2016 actualizado por: University Hospital, Lille

Influence of the Pre-existing Cognitive Status on the Outcome in Patients Treated by Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Cerebral Ischaemia

At the acute stage of cerebral ischaemia, the only effective drug that increases the proportion of patients who survive without dependency is thrombolytic therapy by intravenous (i.v.) tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA). This treatment is entered into routine practice with similar results than in trials, in various places of the world including Europe and Japan.

Stroke and dementia are closely related. About one patient in ten has dementia before a first-ever stroke, and more than one in three has dementia after a recurrent stroke. Pre-existing dementia is associated with a worse outcome of stroke, and pre-existing cognitive impairment without dementia is associated with a higher rate of institutionalisation within 3 years. In many patients cognitive impairment is due to the summation of the effects of vascular and Alzheimer lesions of the brain.

More and more patients nowadays who are eligible for rt-PA are already known as demented at admission. A retrospective study conducted in a cohort of patients with dementia who had an ischaemic stroke and were treated by rtPA suggested that there is no increased risk of cerebral bleeding and death as compared with non demented patients. However, pre-existing cognitive impairment is possibly associated with (i) an increased risk of bleeding in patients with cognitive impairment, and (ii) a higher sensitivity to the neurotoxic effect of rt-PA on the brain tissue.

Japanese patients differ from European patients by a higher risk of spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage, and a higher proportion of patients with small-vessel diseases.

The primary objective of the OPHELIE-COG study is to determine whether ischaemic stroke patients who are treated with i.v. rt-PA are more likely to have a poor outcome (defined as a modified Rankin scale 2 to 6 at month 3) in the presence of pre-existing cognitive impairment or dementia. The secondary objectives are to determine whether (i) they have an increased risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhages, (ii) the proportion of patients who have a poor outcome is lower than expected from the placebo group of randomised trials for patients with a similar range of baseline severity, and (iii) the influence of the cognitive state on outcome differs between Japanese and European patients.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

The French part of OPHELIE-COG is run as an ancillary study of OPHELIE, a multicenter French study conducted in the clinical centres of the Strokavenir research network (co-PI Didier Leys, Lille and Denis Vivien, Caen). OPHELIE has been approved by the ethical committee and is an investigator-driven study supported by the INSERM, the University Lille Nord de France and the Lille University hospital. OPHELIE includes prospectively all patients who are treated by i.v. rt-PA for an acute cerebral ischaemia in the participating centres and tests the hypothesis that the single/two chain-tPA ratio in the infusion influences the 3-month outcome, evaluated by a score 0 or 1 at the modified Rankin scale(mRS). OPHELIE-COG is conducted in the same cohort of patients as an ancillary analysis of OPHELIE.

The Japanese part of OPHELIE-COG will be conducted In patients who receive i.v. rt-PA for acute cerebral ischaemia in participating Japanese centres. Japanese centres will not be part of the OPHELIE study.

No specific investigation is necessary for the purpose of the study. There is no variable recorded that is not part of the usual management of stroke patients treated by i.v. rt-PA. Following-up patients at 3 months and having mRS is recommended to monitor the results of thrombolysis in all centres able to deliver the treatment. The informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE)is not part of the care in all centres but is however highly recommended because of the influence of the pre-existing cognitive state on stroke outcome in general.

The systematic assessment of pre-existing dementia is conducted within 48 hours of stroke onset by French or Japanese translations of the short version of the IQCODE. Patients who are already followed-up by a neurologist and diagnosed as demented before stroke are classified as previously demented irrespective of the IQCODE score. Patients who cannot have an IQCODE but have a MMSE score of 30 before discharge are classified as cognitively normal. Patients who cannot have an IQCODE and have a MMSE score of 29 or less are not eligible.

The sample size calculation for the French patients has been performed for the primary objective of OPHELIE assuming an expected difference of 5% for the primary end-point with alpha and beta risks of 5% and 20% respectively and a expected proportion of patients with a mRS score 0-1 of 40% at month-3, according to trials, observational registries and data published in the Lille centre for a baseline NIH score of 11: 900 patients will be necessary. To detect an absolute difference of 10 % for the primary end-point with an alpha risk of 5% and a power of 80%, a sample size of 1040 eligible patients is necessary, assuming that 12 to 16% of patients will have criteria for pre-existing dementia. This 10% absolute difference in the proportion of patients with mRS 0-1 at month 3 between those with and without pre-existing dementia corresponds to the difference below which the beneficial effect of rt-PA may be lost, taking into account that approximately 30% of patients under placebo, and 40% under rt-PA have a mRS 0-1 at month 3 for a median baseline NIH score of 11. Assuming that 20% of patients included in OPHELIE will not be eligible for OPHELIE-COG according to the proportion of exclusions found in previous studies with the IQCODE, we can expect a recruitment of 720 patients in the French arm of the study. The 320 other patients will be recruited in Japan, meaning that 400 patients have to be recruited to compensate the usual 20% rate of patients who cannot have an IQCODE in due time.

An intermediate analysis will be performed after inclusion of 500 patients arrived at 3 months of follow-up to re-evaluate the sample size.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

205

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Lille, Francia, 59000
        • Lille University Hospital
      • Fukuoka, Japón
        • Fukuoka Redcross Hospital
      • Fukuoka, Japón
        • Fukuoka-Higashi Medical center
      • Fukuoka, Japón
        • Kyushu Medical Center
      • Fukuoka, Japón
        • Kyushu University
      • Kitakyushu, Japón
        • Kyushu Rosai Hospital
      • Kitakyushu, Japón
        • Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital
      • Kurashiki, Japón
        • Kawasaki Medical University
      • Kurume, Japón
        • St. Mary's Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Patients treated by iv tPA for acute cerebral ischaemia in routine practice

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients treated by iv tPA for cerebral ischaemia in routine practice in participating centres

Exclusion Criteria:

  • index ischaemic stroke sparing MCA territory;
  • thrombolytic therapy administered intra-arterially or combined with thrombectomy
  • pre-stroke mRS of 2 or more
  • impossibility to perform an IQCODE for any reason (no reliable informant available within 48 hours, not fluent in French or in Japanese or in a language spoken by the investigator), except when the patient had been diagnosed as demented by a specialist used to diagnose dementia (e.g. neurologist, psychiatrist, geriatrician) before stroke, or has a MMSE score of 30 at discharge.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: Grupo
  • Perspectivas temporales: Futuro

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Cognitively normal
Patients with IQCODE score of 52 or less
Cognitively impaired - no dementia
IQCODE score 53 - 63
Demented
IQCODE score 64 or more

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
Modified Rankin Scale score 0 or 1
Periodo de tiempo: Month-3
Month-3

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage defined according to the ECASS2 definition
Periodo de tiempo: 7 days
7 days
Muerte
Periodo de tiempo: Día 7
Día 7
Modified Rankin Scale 0-2
Periodo de tiempo: Month-3
Month-3
Death
Periodo de tiempo: Month-3
Month-3

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Kei Murao, MD, Lille University Hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de noviembre de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de diciembre de 2014

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de octubre de 2012

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

22 de octubre de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

24 de octubre de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

27 de octubre de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

26 de octubre de 2016

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

No

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir