Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparison of the Baska Mask Airway to a Single-use LMA Device in Low-risk Female Patients

15 de marzo de 2013 actualizado por: John Laffey

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the Baska mask supraglottic airway device with a single use laryngeal mask device (LMA) in low-risk female patients.

The investigators have performed a number of studies on novel airway devices, including 3 studies on the Baska mask. This trial will compare some performance characteristics of the studied devices, including airway seal pressures, insertion success rates, device use difficulty scores. Additional performance and device safety data will be accumulated.

The investigators have two primary hypotheses, namely 1.Non-inferiority of first placement attempt success rate of the Baska mask vs LMA; and 2.greater seal pressure of the Baska mask vs LMA.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Supraglottic airway devices have established place in the airway management in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

The Baska mask is a new supraglottic airway device. It's features include:

  1. Non pressurized cuff designed to reduce the risk of oropharyngeal tissue damage.
  2. Improved cuff seal during the inspiratory phase of positive pressure ventilation
  3. An improved system for drainage of oropharyngeal contents intended to reduce the rate of lung aspiration.
  4. Integrated bite-block to reduce the risk of patients biting and blocking the airway.

This study is randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. The participants will be allocated to two groups, in which either the Baska mask or the single use LMA will be the primary airway management device.

Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval has been obtained. Suitable participants will be recruited after written informed consent.

Standard anesthetic preassesment and anesthesia will be provided.

Consenting patients will be randomly allocated to either of the 2 study groups.

Protocol for airway size selection and attempts at placement will be followed.

The investigators will monitor a number of parameters, including time and ease of insertion, airway seal pressure, airway leak, complications related to device use and other.

Follow up will be performed.

The investigators have two primary hypotheses:

  1. That the Baska mask is non-inferior to LMA in respect if first placement attempt success rate. A greater than 15% difference in success rate will be considered a clinically important difference and will disprove this hypothesis.
  2. The Baska mask is superior in respect of seal pressure. A 20% higher seal pressure with Baska as compared to the LMA device seal pressure will be considered a clinically important difference.

Interim analysis will be performed once 75 patients are recruited per group. This is reasonable as this figure exceeds that required to prove or disprove the primary hypothesis regarding the seal pressure. The study will only be stopped at this stage if the non-inferiority hypothesis is disproven with P value < 0.01

In addition to the above the investigators will evaluate a number of secondary outcomes.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

150

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Galway, Irlanda
        • Galway University Hospitals

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

16 años a 85 años (Niño, Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Written informed consent
  • ASA 1-3
  • No relevant allergies
  • Body-mass index (BMI) 35 or less
  • Age 16-85
  • Non-urgent surgery of planned duration under 4 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability of patient/parent to understand or consent for the trial
  • Neck pathology
  • Previous or anticipated problems with the upper airway or upper GI tract
  • BMI >35
  • Predicted or previously documented difficult airway
  • Live Pregnancy
  • Increased risk for Gastric Aspiration

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Baska mask
In this arm the Baska mask will be used as the airway management device
Comparador activo: single use laryngeal mask airway device (LMA)
in this arm a single use LMA device will be used for airway management.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Rate of successful placement of the supraglottic device on first attempt
Periodo de tiempo: within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
The hypothesis is that the Baska mask will have first time placement attempt success rate that is no more than 15% less than that of the comparator - a single use LMA device.
within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
Seal pressure of the supraglottic device
Periodo de tiempo: Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
The investigators will measure the airway seal provided by the device used. The hypothesis is that the seal pressure of the Baska mask is 20% higher than that of the comparator single-use LMA device.
Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Overall rate of successful placement of the supraglottic device
Periodo de tiempo: Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia. Up to 3 device placement attempts are allowed.
Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia. Up to 3 device placement attempts are allowed.
Number of device placement attempts
Periodo de tiempo: Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
Number of optimization maneuvers during device placement
Periodo de tiempo: Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
Within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
user rated Device difficulty score
Periodo de tiempo: within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
the investigators will use 10 cm visual analogue scale to score the whole experience of using the device until successful ventilation is achieved.
within 30 minutes of commencement of general anesthesia
vitals parameter stability
Periodo de tiempo: in the period immediately before and within the first 35 minutes of general anesthesia
The investigators will record non-invasive arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate and blood pressure preoperatively, after induction of general anesthesia and after placement of the airway device.
in the period immediately before and within the first 35 minutes of general anesthesia
Laryngeal view obtained on fiberoptic assessment
Periodo de tiempo: within 2 hours of commencement of general anesthesia
The investigators will perform this when feasible.
within 2 hours of commencement of general anesthesia
Complication rates
Periodo de tiempo: from the moment general anesthesia commenced up to 3 days postoperatively

Complications specifically monitored will be: blood staining, laryngospasm, lip damage, throat pain, dysphagia, dysphonia, heartburn, nausea and vomiting.

The investigators will record other complications related to the use of the device, including but not limited to: desaturation, need to reposition device or switch to alternative device, teeth damage, regurgitation, aspiration

from the moment general anesthesia commenced up to 3 days postoperatively

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Patrick Neligan, FFARCSI, Galway University Hospitals

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de noviembre de 2012

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de enero de 2013

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2013

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

17 de diciembre de 2012

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

17 de diciembre de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

20 de diciembre de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

19 de marzo de 2013

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de marzo de 2013

Última verificación

1 de marzo de 2013

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • C.A.724

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir