Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Impact of Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on Cardiac Function and Echocardiographic Parameters

26 de octubre de 2018 actualizado por: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
Cardiologists and intensive care specialists are confronted daily with mechanically ventilated patients exhibiting cardiac failure. It is of paramount importance to understand the effect of mechanical ventilation on cardiac function and to interpret echocardiographic findings correctly in order to provide the patient with the best possible treatment to support cardiac and circulatory function. Currently physicians interpret echocardiographic findings based on studies that were performed in spontaneously breathing patients. With this study, the investigators intend to contribute to the understanding of cardiac physiology in patients needing ventilatory support, especially they aim to provide the physiological basis for the interpretation of echocardiographic findings in order to improve medical support (e.g. fluid resuscitation, vasoactive drugs, ventilation strategy) of ventilated patients with impaired cardiovascular function.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Background

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is commonly used in intensive care units (ICU) to improve gas exchange and to reduce breathing effort. The need for MV is the single most prominent reason for admission to an intensive care unit, either for acute cardiac or respiratory failure, postoperative ventilation or other reasons. Its usefulness is not limited to critically ill patients but has also gained recognition in treating sleep-related breathing disorders. Soon after the introduction of MV to clinical practice its adverse hemodynamic effects were noted and have been studied ever since. It is now well accepted that MV, by applying external positive pressure in order to achieve tidal breathing, affects lung volume and intrathoracic pressure which in turn influence cardiac loading and function.

Echocardiography is increasingly used in intensive care to evaluate hemodynamics and especially Doppler assessments of mitral inflow and annular tissue velocity to describe left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. There is a growing body of evidence stating that diastolic dysfunction is a key factor for weaning failure from MV, a clinical issue affecting up to one third of patients. Worsened diastolic LV filling under MV may decisively lower cardiac performance and cause hemodynamic instability especially in case of pre-existing diastolic dysfunction in patients with arterial hypertension, a disease with a high prevalence of 30-45% in the general population. So far, despite the extensive use of echocardiography in ventilated patients, the causative pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ventilation-induced changes of echocardiographic parameters used to determine diastolic LV function have never been thoroughly evaluated. Assessing diastolic function during MV is complex since Doppler derived surrogate parameters all depend on cardiac loading conditions and loading itself is inevitably coupled to MV. The question therefore arises whether echocardiography allows for detection of deteriorating LV diastolic function in terms of impaired intrinsic ventricular relaxation or LV stiffness or whether it primarily mirrors MV-induced loading alterations. It is important to differentiate if echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction in the patient under MV are caused by changes in loading or a LV filling restraint since in case of hemodynamic instability the two scenarios would ask for different therapeutic measures. In case of a loading problem, pre- and afterload can be targeted using drugs or fluid resuscitation. If a MV-induced filling restraint is the predominant problem one may consider special ventilatory modes or even deep sedation and the use of muscle relaxants to minimize Pit.

The basic concepts of heart-lung interactions under positive pressure ventilation make it conceivable that extrinsic pressure applied to the thorax and therefore, as explained later in more detail, to the heart may mimic diastolic dysfunction even in a totally healthy heart if assessed by echocardiography. Echocardiographic parameters to assess diastolic function have been evaluated against the gold standard - invasive LV pressure and volume measurements - in spontaneously breathing patients. Such an evaluation is lacking for the patient with ventilatory support and therefore the value of echocardiography for assessment of diastolic function under MV needs further clarification. The investigators intend to comparatively study cardiac and particularly left ventricular diastolic function in ventilated patients using both invasive and ultrasound methods.

Objective

The presented study will elucidate the influence of positive pressure ventilation on cardiac function in humans. Furthermore, the investigators aim to describe the changes of echocardiographic parameters under different levels of positive pressure ventilation and link these changes to the underlying pathophysiological alterations in hemodynamics induced by positive pressure ventilation.

Methods

Prospective single-centre study at the University Hospital Berne. 30 patients scheduled for an elective coronary angiogram will be included. During spontaneous breathing and two different levels of non-invasive PPV transthoracic echocardiography is performed while recording LV-pressure-volume loops using an impedance catheter. Simultaneously the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, the right atrial pressure and the intrathoracic pressure are recorded using a pulmonary artery catheter and an oesophageal balloon respectively.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

30

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • BE
      • Bern, BE, Suiza, 3010
        • Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 75 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 to ≤ 75 years
  • Indication for a coronary angiogram
  • Written informed consent obtained
  • Adequate echocardiographic imaging quality
  • • Patient tolerates a face mask for non-invasive ventilation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Previous myocardial infarction or open heart surgery
  • Severe obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Diastolic dysfunction ≥ grade II
  • Valvular heart disease > grade I
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%
  • Complete left or right bundle branch block
  • Cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Atrial fibrillation or frequent premature beats
  • INR > 3.0 or haemoglobin < 90g/l
  • Glomerular filtration rate < 45ml/min/1.73m2
  • Esophageal disorders

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: All patients
Ventilatory support to alter intrathoracic pressure
Ventilatory support to alter intrathoracic pressure

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Left ventricular diastolic function
Periodo de tiempo: Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure
Assessed by pressure volume loops
Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Left ventricular contractility
Periodo de tiempo: Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure
Assessed by pressure volume loops
Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure
Cardiac function
Periodo de tiempo: Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure
Assessed by echocardiography
Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure
Invasively measured alterations in hemodynamics
Periodo de tiempo: Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure
Alterations of invasively measured hemodynamic parameters including cardiac output and pulmonary artery, right ventricular and right atrial pressures
Under spontaneous breathing and at two levels of positive pressure ventilation, 5 minutes after changing positive end-expiratory pressure

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Stefan Blöchlinger, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de junio de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

11 de septiembre de 2014

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de octubre de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

17 de octubre de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

30 de octubre de 2018

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

26 de octubre de 2018

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2018

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir