Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

RADAR1- Trial of a New Blood Sample Method (Remote Arthritis Disease Activity MonitoR) (RADAR)

2 de mayo de 2018 actualizado por: University of Ulster

Remote Arthritis Disease Activity MonitoR (RADAR 1) - a Feasibility Study of Home-based Dried Blood Spot Use to Monitor an Inflammatory Marker in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

It is important that patients who suffer from Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) have their disease monitored at an early stage, as well as when it is established. Presently, if a patient is to be assessed by means of disease activity scores and blood tests, they must attend a hospital appointment, which can be difficult for patients who live far from the clinic. It would be beneficial to be able to monitor and reliably define and report a disease 'flare' at home. Quite often, by the time the patient attends for an appointment, flare ups have subsided. This study will evaluate the possibility for patients to take their own blood samples in the comfort of their own home, by transferring finger prick blood droplets to a dried blood spot sample (DBSS) card. Patients would then send the cards to the laboratory to test for clinically relevant protein markers. The feasibility of 'remote' monitoring of the patient's disease will be explored.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

In an arthritis patient population living some distance from hospitals, collection of a series of blood samples to monitor disease activity in a timely fashion is difficult. The ability to monitor markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and gauge a patient's response to treatments via disease activity score (i.e. DAS28-ESR) is not just important in early stage disease but also in patients with established disease. Patients with chronic disease tend to lose self-confidence in managing their condition and a substantial proportion can suffer recurrent disease flare- ups. These flare-ups are costly in terms of appointments with GP and specialist clinics and result in significant work disability.

Being able to reliably define and report a disease 'flare' in arthritis is currently problematic as there are no objective measures available to the patient while at home. The clear definition of a flare, as determined through blood testing would help justify an increase in immunosuppressant dose or a course of steroids. Currently, patients make a visit to their GP or hospital clinic, at 6 week intervals at best. In reality, this means that opportunities to monitor CRP during an active 'flare' are often missed and an informed intervention (medication adjustments) is not possible. Home monitoring is constrained by the costs of making phlebotomists available to make frequent home visits to patients. Also for markers which are unstable at ambient temperatures, blood samples need to be refrigerated and rapidly transported to the laboratory for analysis.

Thus the ability for the patient to collect their own blood samples in their own home and send these at ambient temperature to a laboratory would enable 'remote' and timely monitoring of chronic disease. The investigators have recently completed an Arthritis Research UK funded clinical study that demonstrated that a number of clinically relevant proteins related to flares (i.e.?) were reliably collected, stored for less than three months and extracted from dried blood spots (n=20 arthritis patients). The paper cards used to collect blood droplets were pre-treated to stabilise proteins and minimise haemolysis contamination (caused by bursting and breakdown of red blood cells). Our results across 20 arthritis patients revealed that 90% recovery rates can be achieved from dried blood spot sample (DBSS) stored at room temperature for 3 month (relative to a matched -20'C frozen plasma sample). The inflammation marker proteins included C-reactive protein (CRP), tumour necrosis factor alpha and Immunoglobulin G. Without pre-treatment of the DBSS paper, only 53% of these proteins are recovered.

For the patient, use of DBSS means that GP and hospital visits to take blood and carry out tests could be reduced. With minimal training, samples would be obtained simply at home by the patient, over a six week period and then transported at room temperature using conventional post. Proteins could then be analysed at a central lab. In the future, the technology could accompany patient assessments of disease activity and complement ongoing studies focused on wearable sensors to measure joint movement and stiffness (UU Data-glove project).

For the hospital trust, use of this novel technology could obviate the need for patients to attend the clinic for blood sampling. Soon after prescribing a new treatment, clinicians could use DBSS to monitor treatment efficacy in reducing inflammation. This technology therefore offers an earlier opportunity than currently available to titre dosage and switch from ineffective drugs or treatments associated with adverse events. Furthermore, feedback of the monitoring information provided by DBSS could be given to the patient, via for example smartphone application, and has the potential to improve adherence to treatment plans.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Londonderry, Reino Unido, BT47 6SB
        • Northern Ireland Centre for Stratified Medicine/ Altnagelvin Hopsital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

Rheumatoid Arthritis will be diagnosed according to the joint American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria. Patients who are about to receive their first / a change in combination or dose of DMARD (prospective) or are currently being treated by DMARD therapy will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who have received or are receiving biologic therapy will be excluded from the study. Patients will be representative of the 'real life' patient population in the clinics who meet these criteria, and will not be excluded for other general health reasons.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Poner en pantalla
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: In Clinic monitoring
70 method comparison patients who represent a C-reactive protein (CRP) reference range and have retrievable study outcome measures will have a whole blood sample and DBSS taken at recruitment and at a routine six week review.
Experimental: At Home monitoring
30 Prospective patients will provide (i) one whole blood sample and one set of dried blood spot samples (DBSS) at recruitment, (ii) a set of DBSS once a week for six weeks from recruitment, with a matched whole blood sample at six week appointment, (iii) two extra sets of DBSS to be taken during a flare and 24 hours after (iv) 6 prospective patients will have daily hand movement data collected for 5 minutes on each occasion using a provided data glove.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
C-Reactive Protein concentrations
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Six week samples
Baseline and Six week samples

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de noviembre de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de junio de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2017

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

17 de junio de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

17 de junio de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

22 de junio de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

8 de mayo de 2018

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de mayo de 2018

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2018

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Dried Blood Spot device

Suscribir