Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Relationship Between Pain, Anxiety and Fatigue and Knee Position Sense, Balance and Dual Task Performance During Menstrual Cycle in Females With Multiple Sclerosis

29 de mayo de 2020 actualizado por: Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

The Relationship Between Pain, Anxiety and Fatigue and Knee Position Sense, Balance and Dual Task Performance During Menstrual Cycle in Females With Multiple Sclerosis

This study was carried out to investigate the relationship between pain, anxiety and fatigue and knee position sense, balance and dual task performance during menstrual cycle in females with Multiple Sclerosis (FwMS).

In the neurologic group, especially in MS patients, it is well known that disease activity, course, and symptoms can be influenced by the menstrual cycle. Previous studies have reported that the fluctuations of estrogen and progesterone during the menstrual cycle may have an effect on several neurological functions. Menstrual-related symptomatology has primarily been studied as a physiological phenomenon. Increased neurological symptoms, physical disorders and behavioral changes have been reported just before or at the beginning of menstruation in FwMS.

For all these reasons,investigators think that relationship between pain, anxiety and fatigue and knee position sense, balance and dual task performance during menstrual cycle in FwMS.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

14

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Esenboğa
      • Ankara, Esenboğa, Pavo, 06970
        • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Sciences,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

26 años a 49 años (Adulto)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

patients with a confirmed diagnosis of clinically definite MS, physician-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) range of 1-3.5, and having regular menstrual cycle (between 21-35 days).

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MS according to the McDonald criteria, physician-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) range of 1-3.5, having regular menstrual cycle (between 21-35 days), and cognitive levels to give history and following the instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

The exclusion criteria were: patients with acute attacks and using corticosteroid (three months prior to the study), taking oral contraceptive agents, and history of orthopedic lower extremity problems or other neurological disorders.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
females with Multiple Sclerosis
patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MS according to the McDonald criteria, physician-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) range of 1-3.5, having regular menstrual cycle (between 21-35 days), and cognitive levels to give history and following the instructions
Lower abdominal and low back pain was questioned. Pain intensity was evaluated with a 0 to 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS): "0" indicated "no pain" and "10" indicated "the worst imaginable pain [18]. Pain that developed during the activity was also questioned and stated as pain+ activity. A higher score indicates a more severe pain.
Fatigue was assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). This is a 9-item questionnaire that assesses the effect of fatigue on daily living. Each item is a statement on fatigue that the subject rates from 1 "completely disagree" to 7 "completely agree". A score of 4 or higher generally indicates severe fatigue.
The Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to evaluate levels of anxiety. The state part of the STAI is a 20-item self-report inventory designed to measure state anxiety (current feelings of apprehension, worry, etc.). The STAI state scale is scored on four levels of anxiety intensity from 1 "not at all" to 4 "very much" and with a total score between 20 and 80. A higher total score indicates a more severe anxiety level.
Knee position sense was evaluated with a Acumar dual digital inclinometer. Each participant was asked to wear shorts and to lie down in supine position treatment table. The lower extremity of the participant was positioned in neutral for the knee flexion movement. The placement of the digital inclinometer's attachment was the lateral ridge of the femur and tibia. We actively assisted the participant's knee to the target angle and asked the participant to hold it there for 5 seconds before returning the knee to the starting position. After returning to the starting position, participants attempted to repeat the previously attained angle. Participants indicated verbally when they felt they had reached the angle and held their position. This procedure was repeated 3 times for each limb (non-dominant and dominant). We measured the absolute difference between the target angle and the observed angle and calculated the absolute error score by averaging the 3 trials.
The Biodex Balance System (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) was used to measure limits of stability. The participants were asked to position themselves in a comfortable position on the platform and their foot position coordinate was recorded. The participants were asked to complete as quickly as possible the directional tasks displayed on a screen, with the directions displayed at random. A total of 3 tests were performed, at intervals of 10 s. A total score was recorded. The higher the total score, the better the ability of the subjects to transfer the center of gravity.
The timed up and go test (TUG) was used in the evaluation of dual task performance. For this test, participants were seated on a standard armless chair and a cone was placed 3 meters away from the chair. Participants were instructed to stand up and (1) walk towards the cone, (2) turn around the cone, (3) walk back to the chair, and (4) sit back on the chair. It was stated that patients should walk without running but as fast as possible. TUG test was performed initially without task, and then with cognitive and motor tasks, respectively. Cognitive task given during the test is counting three backwards from 100 or counting the names starting with the letter "A", and motor task given is to carry three glasses of water on a tray. The time elapses between standing up from the chair and sitting back to chair was recorded as the test result. As time increases, dual task performance decreases.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
pain intensity
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pain intensity was evaluated with a 0 to 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS): "0" indicated "no pain" and "10" indicated "the worst imaginable pain. A higher score indicates a more severe pain.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
anxiety
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory was used to evaluate levels of anxiety.The state part of the STAI is a 20-item self-report inventory designed to measure state anxiety. A higher total score indicates a more severe anxiety level.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
fatigue
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Fatigue was assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale. Each item is a statement on fatigue that the subject rates from 1 "completely disagree" to 7 "completely agree". A score of 4 or higher generally indicates severe fatigue.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
position sense
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Knee position sense was evaluated with a Acumar dual digital inclinometer.The absolute error scores (in degrees) for knee flexion at 60° was calculated. As absolute error score increases, position sense decreases.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
balance
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The participants are asked to complete the directional tasks displayed on a screen as quickly as possible, with the directions displayed at random. A total of 3 tests were performed, at intervals of 10 second. The test results were used to determine a total score. The higher the total score, the better the ability of the subjects to transfer the centre of gravity.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
dual task performance
Periodo de tiempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The timed up and go test was used in the evaluation of dual task performance. Timed up and go test was performed initially without task, and then with cognitive and motor tasks, respectively. Cognitive task given during the test is counting three backwards from 100 or counting the names starting with the letter "A", and motor task given is to carry three glasses of water on a tray. The time elapses between standing up from the chair and sitting back to chair was recorded as the test result. As time increases, dual task performance decreases.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

15 de abril de 2019

Finalización primaria (Actual)

20 de octubre de 2019

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

11 de diciembre de 2019

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de mayo de 2020

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

26 de mayo de 2020

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

29 de mayo de 2020

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

1 de junio de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de mayo de 2020

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir