Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Short Versus Long Antibiotic Course for Pleural Infection Management (SLIM Trial) (SLIM)

18 de diciembre de 2021 actualizado por: Alexandria University

Short Versus Long Antibiotic Course for Pleural Infection Management (SLIM Trial): a Randomized Controlled Open Label Trial

Infection of the pleural space is serious condition that requires hospitalization, invasive interventions and long courses of antibiotics[1]. Treatment of pleural infection requires long hospital admission with a median of 19 days[2] and medical treatments fails requiring surgical intervention in up to 30% of cases[3]. The mortality from pleural infection is around 10% at 3 months[4].

Besides drainage of the infected fluid, antibiotics are a core component of management of pleural infection[5] and are typically given intravenously in the first few days of treatment until the condition is stabilized at which stage patients are shifted to oral antibiotics of equivalent spectrum. In almost half of the cases of pleural infection, the choice of antibiotics is entirely empirical due to low yield of microbiological tests on pleural fluid in these cases[6]. International guidelines cite a minimum length of antibiotic course of pleural infection of four weeks[5,7] with antibiotic courses typically lasting six weeks[8]. However, these recommendations are based on expert opinion with no robust evidence to support such durations.

The RAPID (renal function, age, purulence, infection source and dietary factors) score has recently been validated as a robust tool to predict 3-month mortality of patients with pleural infection based on demographic and laboratory data (table 1)[4]. A low score (0-2) is associated with 2-3% mortality, medium score (3-4) 9% mortality and high score (5-7) 30% mortality at three months[9]. The utility for this score in clinical management is yet to be determined and this study will attempt using this score to stratify lengths of antibiotic treatment based on proposed risk of adverse outcomes as stipulated by the RAPID score.

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of prescribing shorter courses of antibiotics (2-3 weeks) versus the standard longer courses (4-6 weeks) in medically-treated patients with pleural infection at lower risk of mortality (RAPID score 0-4) who can be safely discharged home within 14 days of hospitalization and how this impacts success of medical treatment.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Infection of the pleural space is serious condition that requires hospitalization, invasive interventions and long courses of antibiotics. Treatment of pleural infection requires long hospital admission with a median of 19 days and medical treatments fails requiring surgical intervention in up to 30% of cases. The mortality from pleural infection is around 10% at 3 months.

Besides drainage of the infected fluid, antibiotics are a core component of management of pleural infection and are typically given intravenously in the first few days of treatment until the condition is stabilized at which stage patients are shifted to oral antibiotics of equivalent spectrum. In almost half of the cases of pleural infection, the choice of antibiotics is entirely empirical due to low yield of microbiological tests on pleural fluid in these cases. International guidelines cite a minimum length of antibiotic course of pleural infection of four weeks with antibiotic courses typically lasting six weeks[8]. However, these recommendations are based on expert opinion with no robust evidence to support such durations. A recent trial compared a two-week versus a three-week antibiotic course for parapneumonic pleural infections. The trial that concluded prematurely due to inability to recruit to target sample size and found that the two regimens were equivalent in terms of risk of failure of medical treatment. Besides being an underpowered study, the results are only applicable to parapneumonic effusions but not primary pleural infections.

The RAPID score has recently been validated as a robust tool to predict 3-month mortality of patients with pleural infection based on demographic and laboratory data. A low score (0-2) is associated with 2-3% mortality, medium score (3-4) 9% mortality and high score (5-7) 30% mortality at three months. The utility for this score in clinical management is yet to be determined and this study will attempt using this score to stratify lengths of antibiotic treatment based on proposed risk of adverse outcomes as stipulated by the RAPID score. A shorter antibiotic course that is as effective as the standard long course is desirable given the common occurrence of side effects with antibiotic treatment. The presence of a robust predictive score of outcome seems as an attractive tool to help stratify patients who can be safely treated with shorter antibiotic courses.

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of prescribing shorter courses of antibiotics (2-3 weeks) versus the standard longer courses (4-6 weeks) in medically-treated patients with pleural infection at lower risk of mortality (RAPID score 0-4) who can be safely discharged home within 14 days of hospitalization and how this impacts success of medical treatment.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

50

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Alexandria, Egipto
        • ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (>18 years old)
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • Admitted to hospital for treatment of pleural infection (both parapneumonic and primary pleural infections included). Pleural infection will be defined by the presence of one of the following:

    1. the presence of pus in the pleural space;
    2. positive pleural fluid gram stain or culture; or
    3. pleural fluid pH < 7.2 or pleural fluid glucose < 40 mg/dL in the setting of acute respiratory infection.
  • RAPID low or intermediate score (0-4)
  • Fit for discharge within 14th day of admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure of medical treatment within 14 days of admission and need for surgical referral
  • Need for hospital admission beyond 14 days due to medical reasons
  • Admission to recurrent ipsilateral pleural infection within the last three months
  • RAPID high score (5 or more)
  • Pleural infection not amenable to drainage at time of diagnosis and therefore upfront decision to treat with prolonged antibiotics
  • Residual pleural collection (despite attempted drainage) that the managing clinician indicated is for prolonged oral suppressive therapy (i.e. six weeks of oral antibiotics).

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Short course
Antibiotic course of 2-3 weeks overall duration for treating pleural infection
Shorter course of antibiotic than standard care of 4-6 weeks
Comparador activo: Long course
Antibiotic course of 4-6 weeks overall duration for treating pleural infection
4-6 weeks of antibiotics

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Number of participants with failure of medical treatment
Periodo de tiempo: Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis
Incidence of failure of treatment as judged by trial clinician requiring further antibiotics and/or tube drainage and/or surgical intervention by six weeks post initial admission. Failure will be determined based on the one or more of the following parameter: clinical (recurrence of symptoms), biochemical (worsening of WCC [by 2000/mm3] or CRP [by > 20%] from discharge values) and radiological (chest X-ray +/- TUS evidence of increasing or new pleural collection).
Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Length of antibiotic treatment in days
Periodo de tiempo: Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis
Total length of antibiotic treatment (in days) in the study arms
Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis
Number of participants with chest X ray worsening at 6 weeks
Periodo de tiempo: Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis
Number of participants with worsening in the 6-week chest X-ray as compared to discharge chest X-ray in the study arms. Chest X-ray pairs (discharge vs 6-week) will be read by a respiratory physician blinded to treatment allocation who will judge whether there is worsening (versus stability or improvement)
Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis
Time to return to normal daily activities in days
Periodo de tiempo: Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis
Time (in days) to return to normal daily activities in participants of the study arms
Outcome assessed at six weeks post diagnosis
Number of participants requiring readmission within 30 days from discharge
Periodo de tiempo: 30 days from discharge
Readmission within 30 days from discharge
30 days from discharge

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Maged Hassan, PhD, ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

28 de septiembre de 2020

Finalización primaria (Actual)

10 de noviembre de 2021

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

6 de diciembre de 2021

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

14 de octubre de 2020

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de noviembre de 2020

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

4 de noviembre de 2020

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

21 de diciembre de 2021

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de diciembre de 2021

Última verificación

1 de diciembre de 2021

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

The spreadsheets with de-identified patient information will be stored securely after trial conclusion with the principal investigator and will be accessible to other members of the study team. Request to access study data by persons outside the study teams will be expected via email and access will be granted by the principal investigator if the request is deemed reasonable.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

5 years after study completion

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

The data that support the findings of this study will be available on request from the corresponding author upon publishing the manuscript with the main results.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CIF

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir