- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07576712
Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
Is the Application of Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Effective for Pain Control in Classical Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
This non-randomised controlled study was conducted from May 2023 to July 2023 after receiving approval from the Institutional Ethical Review Board. The study protocol adhered to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to surgery, written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: individuals aged 18 years or older, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to treat cholelithiasis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II, with no communication barriers, able to cooperate during the intervention, and understanding the use of relevant assessment scales. The exclusion criteria encompassed the following: individuals with contraindications to nerve block, such as infection at the puncture site; those diagnosed with malignancy; individuals suffering from severe liver and kidney diseases, coagulation dysfunction, or similar conditions; individuals with a history of previous abdominal surgery or trauma; long-term users of sedative and analgesic drugs, or those with addiction to alcohol, sedatives, or analgesics; individuals experiencing chronic pain; those with known allergies to the drugs used in the study; individuals with mental illnesses that interfere with perception and pain assessment; individuals taking analgesics prior to surgery; individuals with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35; patients who were converted from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery; perforation of the gallbladder during cholecystectomy; women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, and patients who withdrew their consent at any stage of the study.
According to the results of the study performed by Ozciftci et al. (13) and using the the calculator at https://www.istatistikakademisi.com/sayfa/nicel-verilerde-orneklem-buyuklugu-hesabi.html, the standard effect size was determined as 0.78 with a 5% margin of error and 80% power, and it was deemed sufficient to include n = 26 cases in each group, and for this reason, 30 patients in each group, a total of 60 patients, were included in the study. The patients were equally divided into two groups in order to their administration to the hospital one by one. The control group (Group 1, n=30) consisted of patients who did not receive a TAP block, while Group 2 (n=30) comprised patients who underwent a right-sided unilateral TAP block. One patient who had malignant gallbladder pathology after LC and fou patients who gave missing data or who didn't want to participate in the study excluded during the study and five new patients enrolled.
Throughout the procedure, the study adhered to the established institutional protocol for anesthesia induction, monitoring, and maintenance. All patients underwent a standardized anesthesia induction process (using 2-3 mg/kg of propofol, 0.6-1.2 mg/kg of rocuronium, and 1 μg/kg of fentanyl). Following orotracheal intubation, patients were adjusted to maintain a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, an Inspiration: Expiration ratio of 1:2, a respiratory rate of 12/min, and an end tidal CO2 level ranging from 30 to 40 mmHg in controlled ventilation mode. Anesthesia Throughout the procedure, the study adhered to the established institutional protocol for anesthesia induction, monitoring, and maintenance. All patients underwent a standardized anesthesia induction process (using 2-3 mg/kg of propofol, 0.6-1.2 mg/kg of rocuronium, and 1 μg/kg of fentanyl). Following orotracheal intubation, patients were adjusted to maintain a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, an Inspiration: Expiration ratio of 1:2, a respiratory rate of 12/min, and an end-tidal CO2 level ranging from 30 to 40 mmHg in controlled ventilation mode. Anesthesia maintenance was achieved through a mixture of 60% oxygen and 40% air, along with sevoflurane (maintaining a minimum alveolar concentration of 2.5-3.0).
All surgical procedures were performed by two experienced senior surgeons. The surgeries followed a consistent approach. A 10mm incision was made in the midline, 2 cm below the xiphoid, and a 10mm periumbilical incision was made parallel to the pelvis. Two additional 5mm right subcostal incisions were performed for trocar insertion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All surgical procedures were conducted using a laparoscopic approach, and the abdomen was insufflated with CO2, with the insufflation pressure limited to 13 mmHg throughout the procedure. If a drain was used during the surgery, it was taken out of the abdomen through the 5mm trocar.
The TAP block was performed during the post-anesthesia phase before extubation. The procedure involved the use of an ultrasound system and a linear ultrasound transducer (6-12 Hz). To perform the TAP block, the linear probe was positioned 2 cm below the xiphoid to locate the rectus abdominis muscle and fascia. Moving the probe in a downward and lateral direction, the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles and fascia were identified over the oblique subcostal angle. A 1-2 ml dose of 2% lidocaine was then applied at the insertion site of the peripheral block needle. With the probe in the oblique subcostal position, the peripheral block needle (Braun, Ultra360, 100 mm, Germany) was carefully advanced along the fascia of the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles, from the medial to the inferolateral area of the probe. The accuracy of the block area was confirmed by infiltrating 1-2 ml of 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride, resulting in a hypoechoic and biconvex appearance, as described in the research conducted by Lee et al. (14), and 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on the right side of the abdomen, following the administration described in Sahin et al.'s study (15).
Intravenous infusion of Paracetamol 1 g (Perfalgan®, Bristol-Myers Squibb, USA) was given to all patients at three time points: immediately after surgery, at the 6th hour, and at the 18th hour after surgery. Additionally, all patients received routine intravenous administration of dexketoprofen 50 mg (Arveles®, Menarini, Italy), immediately after surgery and at the 12th hour after surgery to manage pain. Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS) was administered to all volunteers for pain assessment as primary outcome at postoperative 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours, where scores between 0 and 10 could be assigned. If a patient reported a VNRS score of 5 or higher while at rest, they were given Tramadol hydrochloride (Contramal®, Grünenthal, Germany) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. The total amount of tramadol consumed after surgery, as well as age, gender, BMI, operation time, the use of a drain, and postoperative complications, were recorded for each patient as scondary outcome.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turquía (Türkiye), 34098
- Istanbul Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- individuals aged 18 years or older, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to treat cholelithiasis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II, with no communication barriers, able to cooperate during the intervention, and understanding the use of relevant assessment scales
Exclusion Criteria:
- individuals with contraindications to nerve block, such as infection at the puncture site; those diagnosed with malignancy; individuals suffering from severe liver and kidney diseases, coagulation dysfunction, or similar conditions; individuals with a history of previous abdominal surgery or trauma; long-term users of sedative and analgesic drugs, or those with addiction to alcohol, sedatives, or analgesics; individuals experiencing chronic pain; those with known allergies to the drugs used in the study; individuals with mental illnesses that interfere with perception and pain assessment; individuals taking analgesics prior to surgery; individuals with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35; patients who were converted from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery; perforation of the gallbladder during cholecystectomy; women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, and patients who withdrew their consent at any stage of the study.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Prevención
- Asignación: No aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Otro: TAP Block Group
Patients with TAP block
|
The TAP block was performed during the post-anesthesia phase before extubation.
The procedure involved the use of an ultrasound system and a linear ultrasound transducer.
To perform the TAP block, the linear probe was positioned 2 cm below the xiphoid to locate the rectus abdominis muscle and fascia.
Moving the probe in a downward and lateral direction, the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles and fascia were identified over the oblique subcostal angle.
A 1-2 ml dose of 2% lidocaine was then applied at the insertion site of the peripheral block needle.
With the probe in the oblique subcostal position, the peripheral block needle was carefully advanced along the fascia of the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles, from the medial to the inferolateral area of the probe.
|
|
Sin intervención: Control Group
Patients without TAP block
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain scale measurements
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours
|
Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (from 0-10) for pain
|
24 hours
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Grape S, Kirkham KR, Akiki L, Albrecht E. Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration for optimal analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Dec;75:110450. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110450. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
- Wang W, Wang L, Gao Y. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Concerning the Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Front Surg. 2021 Aug 4;8:700318. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.700318. eCollection 2021.
- Karasu D, Yilmaz C, Ozgunay SE, Yalcin D, Ozkaya G. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective study. North Clin Istanb. 2020 Nov 24;8(1):88-94. doi: 10.14744/nci.2020.84665. eCollection 2021.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- TAP Block
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .