Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Results of Nerve Surgery to Treat PostAmputation Pain (TreatPAP)

18 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: jlgroen, Leiden University Medical Center

Results of Nerve Surgery to Treat PostAmputation Pain (TreatPAP): a Prospective Study

Rationale: Postamputation pain (PAP) is frequently seen after amputations and is a severe lifelong disabling condition affecting quality of life (QoL). Different nerve surgical techniques are available to treat PAP if non-surgical treatment options are not sufficient. Multiple techniques have been described for treatment of symptomatic neuromas with varying results. Techniques described include traction neurectomy with/without implantation, nerve grafting, nerve capping, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR). In the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), the most common techniques to treat painful neuromas include TMR and fascicular split (FS). TMR involves coaptating the transected mixed nerve to functional motor nerves, showing promising results in recent studies. FS is a technique closely related to neurectomy with implantation in a functional muscle. The difference is that with FS, the nerve is split into fascicles before implantation to allow for better distribution of nerve fibers. These techniques have not yet been compared. In this study, the investigators will compare both these techniques in a prospective setting for the treatment of PAP. The hypothesis is, that after 12 months, pain will be diminished and QoL will be increased in all patients versus the pre-operative status. There will be little to no difference in outcome between the surgical techniques used.

Objective: To evaluate limb pain in patients with intractable postamputation pain (residual limb pain and phantom limb pain) one year after nerve embedding surgery following the standardized workup of the LUMC.

Study design: Prospective study Study population: Patients 18 years of age or older, with a history of more than 6 months of intractable postamputation neuropathic limb pain, with no history of previous surgical intervention for pain treatment, referred to the Leiden Nerve Center.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The mean difference in pain scores for phantom limb pain and residual limb pain one year postoperatively. An average pain score from the past 7 days is used for PLP and RLP individually, on the 11-point (0-10) numerical rating scale (NRS). Additionally, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Behavior and Interference Questionnaire Short Forms (7a and 8a, respectively) are used one year postoperatively.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Both techniques are currently used in the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and considered standard of care. The decision to perform either technique is solely dependent on the personal preference of the treating nerve surgeon. The results of this trial will improve the understanding of the treatment effect of both surgical techniques with a minimal patient burden. Participation requires patients to complete 3-4 non-invasive questionnaires about pain, quality of life, depression and anxiety, and mobility over a period of 2 years. The pre-operative (if applicable) and 12-month postoperative questionnaire will each take approximately 15 minutes to complete. The other two questionnaires at 18 and 24 months postoperative will take approximately 3-4 minutes to complete. Additionally, participants will fill out a daily questionnaire consisting of one to three questions about pain for 7 consecutive days at 12 months.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Postamputation pain (PAP) is a common sequela after major lower limb amputation, with an estimated incidence of 61%. PAP can be divided into two major categories: phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP, 'stump pain'). Both RLP and PLP are predominantly driven by the cut nerve endings during the amputation, that form terminal-neuromas. PAP is known to compromise prosthetic rehabilitation and profoundly diminishes the quality of life after amputation. When PAP develops, it is extremely difficult to treat. When non-surgical treatment fails, or side effects of medication dominate patients' lives, surgery for PAP is occasionally undertaken. Nerve surgical techniques that are then applied differ widely and lack any solid scientific base. In general, secondary surgery for PAP includes resection of the neuroma and transposition of the freshened nerve into a more favorable environment, such as muscle, bone, vessels, or fat. This nerve implantation technique has been described since 1918 to treat painful neuromas, showing good results ranging from 64 to 82% of pain relief. Based on the vast experience gained over a 25-year period in the Leiden Nerve Center in treating painful neuromas, an adaptation of the nerve implantation method was developed called the Fascicular Split (FS) technique to treat PAP. In the FS technique, after transecting the neuroma, the nerve is first split into multiple fascicles before implanting the nerve in the muscle. This allows for better distribution of the nerve in the muscle, resulting in less neuroma formation. The strength of FS is its relative simplicity, which is crucial for the wider implementation in routine care. Promising results were observed applying this technique in a small series (n=8) of patients with PAP yielding a long-lasting, life-changing effect in all but one patient. In some cases, FS was performed years after the initial amputation and after previous failed neuroma surgeries. Other nerve handling techniques to treat symptomatic neuroma include centro-central neurorrhaphy, End-to-Side neurorrhaphy, Graft to Nowhere, Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR), and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface. TMR is, after simply embedding the nerve in healthy tissue, the best studied and most promising technique to treat PAP. Several cohort studies and a recent randomized trial in secondary surgery for PAP show that a nerve surgical technique called Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is effective in treating PAP. However, the main disadvantage of TMR is that it is a time-consuming procedure.

To date, there are no studies that compare both techniques for the treatment of PAP. The investigators believe that the treatment FS yields similar results to TMR. Moreover, in terms of clinical applicability, the FS technique is easier to learn, does not require extensive nerve surgical skills, and does not take much time to perform.

Few papers have been published on TMR as a treatment for postamputation pain. Despite issues with the validity of the articles, results of PLP and RLP were consistently in favor of TMR as a technique regarding all outcome measures, including intensity and interference with daily activities. FS, although not mentioned in the literature, has many similarities with nerve implantation, which showed similarly good results for the treatment of painful neuromas. However, there have been no studies to date that directly compare the two techniques.

PAP is a lifelong disabling condition profoundly affecting quality of life. Nerve embedding surgical techniques (simple, FS, and TMR) have proven to be effective to treat postamputation pain. Preliminary results show that simple embedding, TMR, and FS are potentially good techniques to treat invalidating PAP. However, no comparative studies have been performed.

The investigators hypothesize that FS will show equally good results compared to TMR in the surgical treatment of intractable PAP, reducing pain, and improving quality-of-life (QoL) and mobility.

The investigators propose a prospective observational cohort study evaluating outcomes after various nerve embedding techniques following a standardized selection protocol in patients with intractable post-amputation pain after a major limb amputation.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

98

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Guus A.H. Tendijck, MD
  • Número de teléfono: +316 21320645
  • Correo electrónico: g.tendijck@hotmail.com

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • South Holland
      • Leiden, South Holland, Países Bajos, 2333 ZA
        • Reclutamiento
        • Leiden University Medical Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Patients with intractable postamputation pain after a major extremity amputation (trans humeral, elbow disarticulation, forearm, transfemoral, knee disarticulation, and transtibial) undergoing surgical postamputation pain treatment in our center.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age older than or equal to 18 years
  • Intractable postamputation pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment or delirium at the time of inclusion
  • Having received previous radiotherapy on the affected limb
  • Patients who are unable to comprehend the informed consent form or the questionnaires used in the current study
  • Unfit for general anesthesia

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Control: Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR)
Patients with a symptomatic neuroma requiring surgical intervention

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation surgical technique

  1. Painful nerve is identified and the neuroma is resected.
  2. A nerve stimulator is used to identify functional motor nerve branches. Near the point where the motor branch enters the muscle, the motor nerve branch is transected
  3. End-to-end nerve coaptation is performed between the amputated nerve and the transected motor nerve branch.
Intervention: Fascicular split
Patients with a symptomatic neuroma requiring surgical intervention

Fasicular split surgical technique:

  1. Painful nerve is identified and the neuroma is resected.
  2. Split the nerve into its constituent multiple nerve fascicles
  3. Create a deep muscle pocket for each individual fascicle
  4. Plant each fascicle into a separate muscle compartment and fixate the fascicle in place with tissue glue.
Otros nombres:
  • nerve embedding

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Phantom limb pain measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale.
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year postoperatively
A primary endpoint is the mean phantom limb pain experience one year postoperatively. This will be measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale over 7 consecutive days. A higher score indicates worse pain.
1 year postoperatively
Residual limb pain measured on the 11-point numeric rating scale
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year postoperatively
A primary endpoint is the mean residual limb pain experience one year postoperatively. This will be measured on the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale over 7 consecutive days. A higher score indicates worse pain.
1 year postoperatively
PROMIS pain behavior short form 7a
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year postoperatively
PROMIS pain behavior short form 7a in Dutch-Flemish
1 year postoperatively
PROMIS pain interference short form 8a
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year postoperatively
PROMIS pain interference short form 8a in Dutch-Flemish
1 year postoperatively

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Phantom limb pain using the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 24 months post-operatively
From enrolment until 24 months post-operatively
Residual limb pain using the 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
PROMIS pain behavior 7a short form in Dutch-Flemish
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
PROMIS pain interference 8a short form in Dutch-Flemish
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 24 months postoperatively
Pain type using the ICAN localization map
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
Neuropathic pain using the PainDetect
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
Hospital anxiety and depression using the HADS
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
Perceived treatment effect using the GPE-DV
Periodo de tiempo: at 12 months postoperativley
at 12 months postoperativley
Prosthetic rehabilitation using the PLUS-M
Periodo de tiempo: From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
From enrolment until 12 months postoperatively
Changes in sensory quality in the amputated stump using quantitative sensory testing (QST)
Periodo de tiempo: at enrolment until 12 months postoperative
at enrolment until 12 months postoperative
Quantified neuroma perfusion using near-infrared fluorescence using indocyanine green
Periodo de tiempo: Peri-operatively
Patients will receive near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) during the surgery. ICG is a fluorescent dye that binds to plasma proteins and emits light when excited by near-infrared wavelengths. After intravenous injection, the dye circulates rapidly, allowing surgeons to assess blood flow to tissue of interest. This method has very good safety profile and has been used extensively in gastro-intestinal, reconstructive, vascular and neurosurgery. This study aims to use quantified ICG NIR fluorescence imaging to evaluate perfusion patterns of symptomatic and asymptomatic neuromas after amputation.
Peri-operatively
Surgery duration
Periodo de tiempo: Perioperatively
in minutes
Perioperatively
Length of hospital stay
Periodo de tiempo: From the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital, up to 1 year post surgery
Amount of days patients spent in hospital post surgery
From the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital, up to 1 year post surgery
Adverse events
Periodo de tiempo: until 30 days postoperatively
i.e., infection, rebleed, with Clavien-Dindo scores
until 30 days postoperatively
Medication Quantification Scale
Periodo de tiempo: until 24 months postoperatively
Phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, the PROMIS pain behavior 7a short form, and the PROMIS interference 8a short form will be corrected for pain medication use, using the medication quantification scale. A higher score indicates more pain medication use.
until 24 months postoperatively

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Justus L. Groen, MD, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

14 de agosto de 2025

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

20 de agosto de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

20 de agosto de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de septiembre de 2025

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

26 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

26 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Descripción del plan IPD

Undecided

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir