Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Artificial Intelligence-Guided Diagnosis for High-Risk Osteoporosis Populations: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

27 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Kun-Hui Chen, Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Project Summary

I. Project Objectives

With the rapid advancement of medical technology, smart medical devices have become one of the key components of modern healthcare. However, integrating these emerging technologies into the national health insurance (NHI) reimbursement system while ensuring their clinical value and economic benefits remains a major challenge worldwide.

The primary goal of this project is to assist commercialized smart medical device products-those that have passed TFDA review and seek NHI reimbursement-in conducting comprehensive evaluations of their clinical effectiveness and medical economic impact. Through scientific data and standardized impact assessment procedures, the project aims to provide localized evidence to support reimbursement policy decisions and facilitate the market adoption of smart medical technologies. Ultimately, this project seeks to balance therapeutic efficacy and cost control, offering a scientific foundation for NHI decision-making and paving the way for the sustainable development of AI-driven healthcare innovations.

II. Implementation Methods

  1. Multi-center Collaborative Network

    This project will be led by Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH) as the principal site, with collaboration from Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital and Changhua Show Chwan Memorial Hospital. This cross-institutional, cross-regional alliance ensures diverse clinical samples, enhances the representativeness of study results, and allows evaluation of AI medical devices across different healthcare systems and environments.

  2. Clinical Trial Design and Implementation for Smart Medical Devices

    The project will design and execute systematic clinical trials for smart medical devices using methodologies such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), before-and-after studies, pragmatic RCTs (PCTs), cluster RCTs, and stepped-wedge RCTs. These rigorous designs will ensure scientific validity, reproducibility, and practical feasibility in real-world clinical settings.

  3. Health Economic Evaluation

    A key component of this project is the medical economic assessment, conducted by experienced health economists through cost-effectiveness analysis. The evaluation will focus on how smart medical devices reduce healthcare costs, improve diagnostic efficiency, and enhance treatment outcomes, quantifying their economic value within the NHI system. This evidence will guide policy makers in making data-driven reimbursement decisions.

  4. Standardized Impact Assessment Process

    To ensure high-quality research, the project will establish a comprehensive standardized impact assessment framework covering trial design, data collection, statistical analysis, economic evaluation, and ethical review. This standardized approach not only improves the precision of the study but also accelerates the clinical translation of AI medical devices through streamlined application and review processes.

  5. Research Case Study and Clinical Application

    The featured case study in this project is "VeriOsteo OP® Smart Bone Screening System," which targets early osteoporosis screening among adults aged 40 to 80 years in high-risk groups. This study will evaluate the clinical accuracy of AI-based osteoporosis screening and assess its economic contribution to healthcare cost reduction. The findings will directly inform the Ministry of Health and Welfare's NHI Administration in formulating reimbursement standards for AI medical devices.

  6. Data Sharing and Information Security

    Throughout the project, all research data collection, exchange, and sharing will strictly adhere to cybersecurity and privacy regulations. The AI models involved will undergo validation to ensure the reliability and scientific rigor of the results. Furthermore, the project will promote collaboration between manufacturers and healthcare institutions to support the adoption of smart medical technologies.

  7. Final Outcomes and Future Development

The final deliverables will include a comprehensive evaluation report on the clinical and economic performance of the AI medical device, along with recommendations for NHI reimbursement application. The results will provide a reference model for future AI medical devices entering the reimbursement system and further advance the field of smart healthcare. In the long term, the center aims to expand its research to other disease domains while strengthening data security and ethical oversight to ensure the feasibility and credibility of AI applications in clinical practice.

III. Expected Outcomes and Future Vision

By implementing a multi-center collaborative framework, this project aims to promote clinical adoption and economic evaluation of smart medical devices, offering concrete data to support NHI policy-making. Over time, the project is expected to establish a robust evaluation system for AI medical devices, facilitate broader market adoption, and enhance patient outcomes whi

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

1180

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Changhua, Taiwán
        • Reclutamiento
        • Show Chwan Memorial Hospital
        • Contacto:
      • Kaohsiung City, Taiwán
        • Reclutamiento
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
        • Contacto:
      • Taichung, Taiwán
        • Reclutamiento
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
        • Contacto:
          • Kun Hui Chen, MD
          • Número de teléfono: 04-23592525#5100
          • Correo electrónico: khc@vghtc.gov.tw

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 40 to 80 years old
  • Identified as high-risk by the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Taiwan Postmenopausal Women (OSTAi) <-1 or Male Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Taiwan (MOSTAi) ≦11 based on the individual's age and weight (kg)
  • Had chest x-ray within one year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 40 years old
  • Age >80 years old
  • BMI< 18 kg/m2or >30 kg/m2
  • Pregnant in prior one year
  • Recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis within the past two years
  • History of prior DXA imaging (prior quantification of BMD) within 2 years
  • History of metabolic bone disease

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participants will receive AI-guided diagnosis for osteoporosis risk assessment. This group follows a 2:1 randomization ratio.
Participants in the intervention group undergo VeriOsteo OP AI assessment followed by DXA confirmation. The AI system generates a diagnostic report identifying individuals at high risk for osteoporosis. Results are used to guide clinical decision-making and evaluate the diagnostic consistency between the AI-guided system and the gold-standard DXA assessment.
Sin intervención: Control Group
Participants will receive standard-of-care (routine diagnosis) for osteoporosis assessment.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness in terms of the improvement of BMD, of AI-guided diagnosis (VeriOsteo OP)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to the end of follow-up (average 18 months)
The primary endpoint of this study is the change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) expressed as a T-score, measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The T-score is a standardized metric comparing bone density to a healthy young adult. While there is no theoretical absolute minimum or maximum value, typical clinical values range from -5.0 to +2.0. According to the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and Taiwan 2020 guidelines, a T-score of -1.0 or higher is normal, between -1.0 and -2.5 indicates osteopenia, and a T-score of -2.5 or lower (≤ -2.5) indicates osteoporosis. Therefore, a higher (more positive) T-score represents a better outcome (higher bone density). To avoid inflating the detection rate for osteoporosis based on the protocolized DXA at baseline in the intervention arm, a positive AI screen was required to be present to count the chest X-ray findings for the purpose of the primary end point.
Up to the end of follow-up (average 18 months)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Incidence of Bone Fractures
Periodo de tiempo: Every 6 months up to 18 months
he incidence of bone fractures, including hip fracture, vertebral fracture, wrist fracture, and other fractures. Bone fractures will be identified from the participant interviews and confirmed by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) across the three study sites.
Every 6 months up to 18 months
All-Cause Mortality
Periodo de tiempo: Every 6 months up to 18 months
The incidence of all-cause death. Participant status will be followed by telephone and verified through electronic health records (EHRs) from the three study sites.
Every 6 months up to 18 months

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Osteoporosis-related healthcare resource utilization
Periodo de tiempo: 12th month
To analyze the total number of healthcare resource utilizations related to osteoporosis, including the combined counts of outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Data will be collected through a structured questionnaire via telephone interview.
12th month
Osteoporosis-related medical costs
Periodo de tiempo: 12th month
To evaluate the direct medical costs associated with osteoporosis healthcare resource utilization (expressed in New Taiwan Dollars (TWD ). Data will be collected through a structured questionnaire via telephone interview.
12th month

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Kun Hui Chen, MD, Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

13 de marzo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

17 de junio de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

12 de noviembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

14 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

2 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

2 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

As this is a multi-center study, the sharing of individual participant data (IPD) would require joint approval from the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of all three participating hospitals. Given the complex regulatory procedures and strict privacy protocols involved, the data will not be made publicly available at this time.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir