Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Abdominal Stimulation to Improve Cough After Spinal Cord Injury (COUFES)

29 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Liberate Medical

Abdominal Function Electrical Stimulation to Improve Cough Peak Flow After Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) using the VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator improves cough strength in adults with a new spinal cord injury (SCI). It will also learn about the safety of abdominal FES in this population. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does abdominal FES improve cough peak flow (a measure of cough strength) compared to cough training alone? Does abdominal FES reduce the number of respiratory complications (such as pneumonia or atelectasis)? What medical problems do participants have when receiving abdominal FES?

Researchers will compare abdominal FES (active treatment) to supervised cough training without stimulation (control) to see if abdominal FES improves cough function after spinal cord injury.

Participants will:

Receive abdominal FES or perform supervised cough training 5 days per week for up to 6 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation Have cough strength and breathing function measured at the start of the study and every week during treatment Complete quality of life and bowel function questionnaires at multiple time points Have a follow-up visit or phone call 4 weeks after completing treatment

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Spinal cord injury (SCI) at the cervical or high thoracic level impairs the abdominal and intercostal muscles, reducing expiratory muscle strength and cough effectiveness. An impaired cough leads to secretion retention and respiratory complications, which are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the first year following SCI. Current standard-of-care techniques such as manually assisted coughing and mechanical insufflation-exsufflation can augment assisted cough but do not directly improve a patient's voluntary, unassisted cough function.

Abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) uses transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with the expiratory phase of breathing. This approach can recruit the abdominal muscles in the absence of voluntary or automatic muscle activation, making it particularly suited for use after SCI. Prior investigator-initiated studies and pilot randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that abdominal FES is safe and feasible in this population, and that repeated training with abdominal FES can produce longitudinal improvements in respiratory function including cough peak flow (CPF), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF).

This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind (observer-blinded), multicenter superiority trial enrolling adults with a new non-progressive SCI at neurological levels C1-T5 (AIS A-C) who are in the inpatient rehabilitation phase of care and have a CPF below 160 L/min. Approximately 150 participants will be enrolled at up to 20 sites in North America and randomized 1:1 to active treatment or control. Randomization is stratified by site and injury level.

Participants in the active group receive abdominal FES during 3 sets of 10 coughs followed by 30 minutes of quiet breathing, 5 days per week, for up to 6 weeks or until hospital discharge. Stimulation is delivered at 30 Hz / 350 µs during quiet breathing and 50 Hz / 400 µs during coughing, with amplitude titrated to achieve a strong visible abdominal wall contraction. Participants in the control group perform 3 sets of 10 supervised volitional coughs per day, 5 days per week, for the same duration, with no active stimulation.

The primary endpoint is CPF measured 4 weeks post-randomization. Secondary endpoints include additional respiratory function measures (FVC, FEV1, PEF, MIP, MEP), effectiveness of cough (proportion achieving CPF >160 L/min), respiratory complications, bowel function (Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score), quality of life (SF-36ww), global impression of benefit, and mortality. All respiratory function measurements follow ATS/ERS guidelines. Outcome assessors and radiographers are blinded to treatment allocation.

The sample size of 150 participants (75 per group) provides 90% power to detect a 42 L/min between-group difference in CPF improvement from baseline, assuming a standard deviation of 72 L/min and a one-sided significance level of 0.025, with 15% attrition allowance.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

150

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (≥ 22 years of age) admitted to rehabilitation with a new SCI.
  2. New non-progressive SCI occurring in the past 3 to 8 weeks.
  3. Neurological level of injury of C1-T5.
  4. American Spinal Injuries Association Impairment Scale A to C.
  5. CPF of <160 L/min (Note: A CPF of <270 L/min has been shown to be associated with decreased secretion clearance and increased respiratory complications, while a CPF of <160 L/min has been shown to lead to an ineffective cough).
  6. Not dependent on mechanical ventilation (people dependent on mechanical ventilation are at greatly increased risk of respiratory complications and are excluded due to this heterogeneity).
  7. Able to sit upright.
  8. Expected to remain in rehabilitation for at least another 3 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Respiratory complications in previous 24 hours (screening out iatrogenic complications).
  2. Chronic respiratory disease.
  3. No contraction of the abdominal wall muscles in response to abdominal NMES.
  4. Open abdominal surgery ≤ 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  5. Have yet to undergo spinal surgery to stabilize injury, where required.
  6. Body mass index >40 kg/m2.
  7. Pacemaker (external or internal) or implanted electronic device (e.g., a defibrillator).
  8. Known or expected to be pregnant.
  9. Placed on a palliative/supportive care only pathway.
  10. Receiving any of the following as standard of care:

    • Abdominal FES
    • Inspiratory or Expiratory muscle training
    • Transcutaneous or implanted thoracolumbar spinal stimulation
  11. Participating in any of the following:

    • A study with the same or similar primary endpoint
    • A study investigating electrical stimulation or respiratory muscle therapy
    • Any study in which the investigator determines may interfere with the results of this study
  12. Unable or unwilling to comply with protocol requirements, including assessments, tests, and follow-up visits including facial or dental trauma.
  13. Any other medical condition which in the opinion of the Investigator will make participation medically unsafe or interfere with the study results.
  14. Unable to provide informed consent.
  15. Unwilling to provide informed consent.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation (Active Treatment)
Participants receive abdominal FES using the VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator 5 days per week for up to 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first. Abdominal FES is applied during 3 sets of 10 coughs (approximately 7 seconds between each cough, 3 to 5 minutes between sets) followed by 30 minutes of quiet breathing. Stimulation is delivered at 30 Hz / 350 µs during quiet breathing and 50 Hz / 400 µs during coughing, with amplitude titrated to achieve a strong visible abdominal wall contraction without discomfort. Treatment is delivered at the participant's bedside with the participant sitting upright. Active treatment is applied as an adjunct to standard of care.
Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device that applies abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with the expiratory phase of breathing. The device consists of a control unit, nasal-oral cannula (used to detect breathing phase), disposable transcutaneous stimulation electrodes, and power supply. Electrodes are placed posterolaterally to activate the transversus abdominis and internal and external oblique muscles. Stimulation parameters are 30 Hz / 350 µs during quiet breathing and 50 Hz / 400 µs during coughing. Stimulation amplitude is titrated per session to achieve a strong visible abdominal wall contraction without discomfort, expected to be between 50 mA and 100 mA. Stimulation electrodes and nasal-oral cannula are replaced every five days of treatment.
Comparador activo: Supervised Cough Training (Control)
Participants perform 3 sets of 10 supervised volitional coughs per day (approximately 7 seconds between each cough, 3 to 5 minutes between sets), 5 days per week for up to 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first. No active stimulation is applied. Training is delivered at the participant's bedside with the participant sitting upright. Control treatment is applied as an adjunct to standard of care.
Supervised volitional cough training performed without any active stimulation or device assistance. Participants perform 3 sets of 10 coughs per day with approximately 7 seconds between each cough and 3 to 5 minutes between sets, delivered by a trained research team member at the participant's bedside with the participant sitting upright.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cough Peak Flow (CPF)
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and weekly post randomization for 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whatever comes first.
Cough peak flow measured in liters per minute (L/min) using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) bedside respiratory muscle strength system, following European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines. Measurements are recorded with the participant seated upright in a chair/wheelchair or at 90 degrees in bed, breathing through a mouthpiece or tracheostomy valve piece with a nose clip in place. The participant is instructed to breathe in deeply to total lung capacity then cough as hard as possible. The test is performed 3 times and the greatest value is used for analysis. A CPF of less than 160 L/min indicates an ineffective cough, and a CPF of less than 270 L/min has been shown to be associated with decreased secretion clearance and increased respiratory complications in spinal cord injury.
baseline and weekly post randomization for 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whatever comes first.

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Effectiveness of Cough
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Proportion of participants achieving a cough peak flow greater than 160 L/min, measured using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS), indicating attainment of an effective cough threshold.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Number of Participants with Respiratory Complications
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of the 4 week follow-up visit
roportion of participants sustaining a respiratory complication, defined as meeting 2 out of 3 of the following criteria: symptoms and signs suggestive of infection; respiratory symptoms or signs consistent with acute respiratory infection; chest X-ray infiltrates if available; AND receiving therapy for respiratory infection. Includes atelectasis, pneumonia, pleural effusion, and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Extracted from medical records during treatment and through participant self-reporting at follow-up.
From enrollment to the end of the 4 week follow-up visit
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Forced vital capacity measured in liters using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright, following ATS/ERS guidelines. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Forced expiratory volume in one second measured in liters using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright, following ATS/ERS guidelines. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Peak expiratory flow measured in liters per minute using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright, following ATS/ERS guidelines. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Maximum expiratory pressure measured in cmH2O using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright. The participant breathes in to total lung capacity then performs a maximum forceful expiration, maintained for at least 1.5 seconds. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Maximum inspiratory pressure measured in cmH2O using the PneumotracTM (Vitalograph; Lenexa, KS) with the participant seated upright. The participant performs a maximum forceful inspiration after an expiration to residual volume, maintained for at least 1.5 seconds. Three reproducible maneuvers within 10% of each other are required and the greatest value is used for analysis.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Quality of Life as Assessed by the SF-36
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and 4 week follow-up visit
Health-related quality of life measured using the Short Form Health Survey modified and validated for wheelchair users (SF-36ww). The SF-36ww assesses eight health domains and produces physical and mental component summary scores. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and 4 week follow-up visit
Bowel Function as Assessed by the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and weekly post randomization for 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and at 4-week follow-up
Bowel function measured using the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score, a validated 10-item self-report questionnaire evaluating severity of bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients. Scores range from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating more severe bowel dysfunction.
At baseline and weekly post randomization for 6 weeks or until hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and at 4-week follow-up
Global Impression of Benefit from Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: At the end of 6 weeks of treatment or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Participant-reported global impression of change assessed using an 8-point scale, with 0 representing no change and 7 representing a very much improved cough, to evaluate the perceived benefit of the intervention.
At the end of 6 weeks of treatment or hospital discharge, whatever comes first
Mortality
Periodo de tiempo: At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and 4 week follow-up visit
All-cause mortality. For any participant who dies before the 4-week post-intervention follow-up, time post injury and cause of death will be obtained from the participant's clinician.
At 6 weeks or hospital discharge, whatever comes first, and 4 week follow-up visit

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Angus Mclachlan, PhD, Liberate Medical

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

29 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

4 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Sí

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

Sí

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir