Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Impact of Ambulatory Physiological Stimulation of the Efferent Limb Prior to Ileostomy Closure on Colorectal Microbiota Composition and Histopathological Findings (STIMIC)

15 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Romina Pena, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

The STIMIC Trial: A Multicenter Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Impact of Ambulatory Physiological Stimulation of the Efferent Limb Prior to Ileostomy Closure on Colorectal Microbiota Composition and Histopathological Findings

BACKGROUND Loop ileostomies are a type of stoma frequently used to protect high-risk colorectal anastomoses (surgical reconnection of the intestines), for example following rectal cancer resection. Temporary diversion of intestinal transit does not reduce the risk of anastomotic failure, but it does lower the morbidity and mortality associated with potential pelvic sepsis. Unfortunately, a second surgical procedure is required to restore intestinal continuity, and this carries its own risk of complications, the most common being postoperative ileus (temporary paralysis of bowel motility associated with abdominal distension, absence of bowel movements, nausea, and vomiting), which occurs in up to 20% of cases.

Several strategies have been proposed to reduce this problem, including stimulation of the efferent limb of the ileostomy (the part that is connected to the unused colon). This intervention consists of instilling a substance through the efferent limb of the ileostomy into the colon, simulating natural intestinal transit. It emerged as a harmless alternative aimed at reversing changes in the excluded colon in preparation for restoration of intestinal continuity. Several Spanish studies have investigated this technique, concluding that it is safe and significantly reduces the rate of postoperative ileus, thereby shortening hospital stay. Regarding the mechanism by which this intervention may be effective, there are studies investigating the changes that occur during diversion of intestinal transit:

  1. Histopathology: reduced muscular contractility and the presence of intestinal villi in the efferent intestinal limb and excluded colon, which improve once intestinal flow is restored.
  2. Microbiome: significant loss of microbiota in the defunctionalized colon, which progressively recovers with natural intestinal transit and reintroduction of a fiber-rich diet.

Structural and microbiota-related changes favor the development of diversion colitis, a condition associated with erratic bowel habits once intestinal transit is restored. In an attempt to reverse this condition, several products have been tested for stimulation of the efferent limb of the ileostomy: probiotics, short chain fatty acids, saline solution with a thickening agent, and the patient's own intestinal contents, a well-tolerated and effective technique, in some cases superior to saline-based alternatives.

Overall, the available evidence is of low quality due to the limited number of patients studied and protocol variability. For this reason, we propose the implementation of a protocol for stimulation of the distal ileostomy limb prior to ileostomy closure, either with saline solution and thickening agent (the most widely described technique in the literature) or physiological stimulation using the patient's own intestinal contents.

The protocol consists of several sessions in which the instilled volume is progressively increased. This intervention will be performed on an outpatient basis, once daily, during the two weeks prior to surgery.

This process promotes the onset of bowel movements through the anus, which progressively become more formed and less frequent, approaching a more normal bowel habit. Only minor adverse effects have been described with this technique, including cramp-like abdominal pain in 27.6% of sessions. Recently, a nationwide study confirmed the favorable clinical outcomes following distal ileostomy limb stimulation before ileostomy closure. However, to our knowledge, no studies have evaluated its effect on intestinal microbiota.

HYPOTHESIS Distal limb stimulation of the ileostomy before its closure helps in the recovery of the colorectal microbiome and tissue. This associates with lower postoperative complications, specially postoperative ileus.

OBJECTIVES To gain knowledge regarding changes in intestinal microbiota composition before and after stimulation, in order to better understand recovery of intestinal function following this procedure. We will also analyze outcomes after ileostomy closure following efferent limb stimulation, determining the incidence of postoperative complications, particularly postoperative ileus.

METHODOLOGY

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:

  1. Control (no intervention other than the usual preoperative protocol)
  2. Stimulation with serum and thickener
  3. Stimulation with own stoma output

Samples will be collected in all patients:

  1. Stoma output
  2. Stool, before stimulation, if performed
  3. Stool, after stimulation, if performed
  4. Stool, a month after surgery

For a group of patients, the ones recruited at Hospital Clínic, rectal biopsies will also be collected before and after stimulation, to compare the effect of the treatment in the colonic tissue. We will collect clinical data during the whole process regarding postoperative complications.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

90

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Romina Pena, MD
  • Número de teléfono: +34 617333153
  • Correo electrónico: PENA@clinic.cat

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

  • Nombre: Miguel Pera, MD, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: 5559 +34 932275400
  • Correo electrónico: PERA@clinic.cat

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients 18 yo and older, with a loop ileostomy after colorectal surgery for malignant or benign disease and a barium enema that rules out colorectal anastomotic leak or stenosis.
  2. Patients must be self-sufficient in their stoma care or dispose of assistance by a family member or healthcare provider.
  3. Patients must reside no further than 50km from the hospital and dispose of postoperative home-assistance by a family member or healthcare provider.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with a terminal ileostomy or a closed distal limb, inaccesible to preoperative stimulation.
  2. Patients with the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease.
  3. Patients incapable of comprehending or signing the informed consent.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Sin intervención: Control
No efferent limb stimulation.
Comparador activo: Serum stimulation
Efferent limb stimulation with serum and thickener.
The intervention has been described in previous studies, but the investigation of the microbiome changes associated with the obtained clinical results hasn't been described to date. Also, a study with three arms hasn't been published to date.
Otros nombres:
  • efferent limb stimulation
  • physiological stimulation
Comparador activo: Physiological stimulation
Efferent limb stimulation with the patient's own stoma output.
The intervention has been described in previous studies, but the investigation of the microbiome changes associated with the obtained clinical results hasn't been described to date. Also, a study with three arms hasn't been published to date.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Changes in colorectal microbiome before and after efferent limb stimulation prior to stoma closure.
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 3 months.
Descriptive analysis of the microbiome profiles of the three groups of patients (control, stimulation with serum, stimulation with own stoma output).
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 3 months.
Changes in colorectal tissue before and after efferent limb stimulation prior to stoma closure.
Periodo de tiempo: From the time of first biopsy (before stimulation) to the second one (surgery day).
Description of the tissue obtained by biopsy of the rectum, before and after stimulation of the ileostomy.
From the time of first biopsy (before stimulation) to the second one (surgery day).

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Postoperative complications after stoma closure.
Periodo de tiempo: From the surgery (ileostomy closure) to 30 days follow-up.
Incidence of postoperative ileus and surgical site infection.
From the surgery (ileostomy closure) to 30 days follow-up.
Functional outcomes after efferent limb stimulation (LARS score)
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of follow-up a 3 months.

Description of the funcional (defecatory) outcomes after ileostomy closure.

LARS (Low Anterior Resection Syndrome) score: total score ranges from 0-42 points (0-20 is equivalent no LARS, 21-29 points to minor LARS, and 30-42 to major LARS).

From enrollment to the end of follow-up a 3 months.
Functional outcomes after efferent limb stimulation (Vaizey score)
Periodo de tiempo: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 3 months.

Description of the funcional (defecatory) outcomes after ileostomy closure.

Vaizey score (also known as the St. Mark's Incontinence Score): total score ranges from 0 (perfect continence) to 24 points (severe incontinence).

From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 3 months.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Romina Pena, MD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de marzo de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

10 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

17 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • HCB/2026/0615

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

All IPD that underlie results in a publication.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning 1 month and ending 1 year after the publication of results.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

IPD and supporting information of this study might be accessed by fellow researchers with a future study, related to our published findings. Researchers must submit a request for data sharing by contacting the principal investigator, who will also be the corresponding author in the future published data. The request to access IPD will be reviewed by the principal investigator (Romina Pena).

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • CIF
  • RSC

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir