- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07678216
Comparing Sedatives for Intracranial Pressure Control in Traumatic Brain Injury (ICP-TBI)
Effect of Propofol, Midazolam, and Dexmedetomidine on Intracranial Pressure and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Urgent Neurosurgical Intervention
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure control and clinical outcomes in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury undergoing urgent neurosurgical intervention.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Which sedative agent provides better control of intracranial pressure, assessed by optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), during the first 24 hours after neurosurgical intervention?
- How do the three sedative agents compare in achieving target sedation depth, maintaining hemodynamic stability, and improving short-term clinical outcomes such as ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay?
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine for 24 hours of continuous sedation. Clinical, hemodynamic, and neurological outcomes will be assessed and compared among the three study groups.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Prevention of secondary brain injury through optimal control of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a key component of intensive care management in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Sedative agents are routinely used to facilitate mechanical ventilation, reduce cerebral metabolic demand, and improve ICP control. However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal sedative agent for this patient population.
Propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine are among the most commonly used sedatives in neurocritical care. Each agent has distinct pharmacological characteristics that may influence intracranial pressure, hemodynamic stability, neurological assessment, and clinical outcomes. Despite widespread use, direct comparative evidence between these agents remains limited.
This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure control and clinical outcomes in adult patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury undergoing urgent neurosurgical intervention. Intracranial pressure will be assessed noninvasively using serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements obtained by ocular ultrasonography during the first 24 hours of continuous sedation.
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three sedative regimens according to a standardized protocol targeting a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4. Standard neurocritical care management and analgesia protocols will be applied to all study groups.
The study will evaluate the comparative effects of the three sedative agents on intracranial pressure control, sedation quality, hemodynamic stability, adverse events, secondary brain injury, and short-term clinical outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence to guide sedative selection in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury, particularly in settings where invasive intracranial pressure monitoring is not routinely available.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Mohamed Abdelhamed, M.Sc
- Número de teléfono: +201061651065
- Correo electrónico: mohamed.said@med.aswu.edu.eg
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Asyut Governorate
-
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egipto, 81528
- Aswan university hospital
-
Contacto:
- Mohamed Abdelhamed, M.Sc.
- Número de teléfono: 01061651065
- Correo electrónico: hamedo_2020@yahoo.com
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥18 years
- Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury with post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤12
- Undergone urgent neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, craniectomy, or ICP monitor placement) within 24 hours of injury
- Admitted to ICU and expected to require continuous sedation
- Hemodynamically stable or stabilized (defined as MAP ≥65 mmHg with vasopressor requirement ≤0.1 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalent)
- Informed consent obtained from legally authorized representative
Exclusion Criteria:
- The Relative refusal to participate in the research.
- Known allergy or contraindication to propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine
- Pre-existing neurological disorders (epilepsy, prior stroke, brain tumors, dementia) that may interfere with outcome assessment
- Severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh Class C) or acute liver failure
- Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m² or requiring renal replacement therapy)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Hemodynamic instability requiring norepinephrine >0.1 mcg/kg/min or equivalent vasopressor support
- Heart rate <50 bpm or second/third-degree AV block without pacemaker (relative contraindication for dexmedetomidine)
- Clinical determination of brain death or expected survival <24 hours
- Enrollment in another interventional trial
- Severe polytrauma requiring ongoing surgical interventions that would interfere with protocol adherence
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Único
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Propofol
Participants receive continuous intravenous propofol infusion initiated at 1 mg/kg/h and titrated to 1-4 mg/kg/h to maintain a target RASS score of -3 to -4 for 24 hours.
|
Continuous intravenous propofol infusion initiated at 1 mg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 1-4 mg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period.
|
|
Experimental: Midazolam
Participants receive continuous intravenous midazolam infusion initiated at 0.03 mg/kg/h and titrated to 0.02-0.1 mg/kg/h to maintain a target RASS score of -3 to -4 for 24 hours.
|
Continuous intravenous midazolam infusion initiated at 0.03 mg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 0.02-0.1 mg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period.
An initial bolus dose of 0.05 mg/kg may be administered if rapid sedation is required.
|
|
Experimental: dexmedetomidine
Participants receive continuous intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion initiated at 0.4 μg/kg/h and titrated to 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h to maintain a target RASS score of -3 to -4 for 24 hours.
|
Continuous intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion initiated at 0.4 μg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period.
No loading dose will be administered.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Intracranial Pressure Control Assessed by Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
Intracranial pressure control will be evaluated using serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements obtained by ocular ultrasonography.
The primary outcome will be the mean ONSD over the 24-hour intervention period, analyzed as a continuous measure of intracranial pressure control.
|
Baseline, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Time at Target Sedation Level
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
Percentage of assessment time during which patients maintained the target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4.
The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable).
Higher scores indicate greater agitation, whereas lower scores indicate deeper sedation.
The target sedation level for this study is RASS -3 to -4.
|
24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
|
Mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) Score
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
Mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score during the 24-hour intervention period.
The RASS ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable), with target sedation defined as -3 to -4.
|
24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
|
Need for Rescue Sedation
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
Proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation due to failure to achieve target sedation despite maximum protocol dose.
|
24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
|
Time to Achieve Target Sedation
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
Time from initiation of study sedative infusion until achievement of target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score (-3 to -4).The RASS ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable)
|
24 hours after initiation of sedation
|
|
Incidence of Hypotension
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation
|
Incidence of hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) <60 mmHg.
|
24 hours after initiation of study sedation
|
|
Vasopressor Requirements
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
|
Vasopressor requirements assessed by the proportion of patients requiring vasopressor support.
|
24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
|
|
Incidence of Bradycardia.
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
|
Percentage of participants who develop bradycardia, defined as a sustained heart rate <50 beats per minute (bpm).
|
24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Secondary Brain Injury ✅
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
|
Secondary brain injury will be assessed by the presence of new or progressive findings on brain computed tomography (CT) compared with baseline imaging, including new intracranial hemorrhage, progression of cerebral edema (defined as >25% increase in midline shift or worsening basal cistern effacement), new cerebral infarction, or transtentorial or uncal herniation.
Brain CT scans will be reviewed by a blinded neuroradiologist.
|
Baseline and 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
|
|
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Periodo de tiempo: From initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, measured as the number of days from initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful liberation from ventilatory support.
|
From initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
|
Time to Neurological Awakening
Periodo de tiempo: From discontinuation of study sedation until achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale motor score of ≥5, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
Time from discontinuation of study sedation to achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score of ≥5.
The Glasgow Coma Scale motor component ranges from 1 (no motor response) to 6 (obeys commands), with higher scores indicating better neurological function.
|
From discontinuation of study sedation until achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale motor score of ≥5, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
|
ICU Mortality
Periodo de tiempo: From ICU admission until ICU discharge, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
Death from any cause during the ICU stay following urgent neurosurgical intervention for traumatic brain injury.
|
From ICU admission until ICU discharge, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Silla de estudio: Ahmed Elsaied Aly, Ph.D., Sohag University
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
- Químicos orgánicos
- Compuestos heterocíclicos, 1 anillo
- Compuestos heterocíclicos
- Compuestos heterocíclicos, 2 anillos
- Compuestos heterocíclicos, anillo fusionado
- Azoles
- Hidrocarburos
- Hidrocarburos, cíclico
- Hidrocarburos, aromáticos
- Imidazoles
- Fenoles
- Derivados de benceno
- Benzazepines
- Benzodiacepinas
- Midazolam
- Dexmedetomidina
- Propofol
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 1230/3/26
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .