Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparing Sedatives for Intracranial Pressure Control in Traumatic Brain Injury (ICP-TBI)

24 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Mohamed Abdelhameed Sayed, Aswan University

Effect of Propofol, Midazolam, and Dexmedetomidine on Intracranial Pressure and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Urgent Neurosurgical Intervention

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure control and clinical outcomes in adults with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury undergoing urgent neurosurgical intervention.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Which sedative agent provides better control of intracranial pressure, assessed by optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), during the first 24 hours after neurosurgical intervention?
  • How do the three sedative agents compare in achieving target sedation depth, maintaining hemodynamic stability, and improving short-term clinical outcomes such as ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay?

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine for 24 hours of continuous sedation. Clinical, hemodynamic, and neurological outcomes will be assessed and compared among the three study groups.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Prevention of secondary brain injury through optimal control of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a key component of intensive care management in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Sedative agents are routinely used to facilitate mechanical ventilation, reduce cerebral metabolic demand, and improve ICP control. However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal sedative agent for this patient population.

Propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine are among the most commonly used sedatives in neurocritical care. Each agent has distinct pharmacological characteristics that may influence intracranial pressure, hemodynamic stability, neurological assessment, and clinical outcomes. Despite widespread use, direct comparative evidence between these agents remains limited.

This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effects of propofol, midazolam, and dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure control and clinical outcomes in adult patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury undergoing urgent neurosurgical intervention. Intracranial pressure will be assessed noninvasively using serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements obtained by ocular ultrasonography during the first 24 hours of continuous sedation.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three sedative regimens according to a standardized protocol targeting a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4. Standard neurocritical care management and analgesia protocols will be applied to all study groups.

The study will evaluate the comparative effects of the three sedative agents on intracranial pressure control, sedation quality, hemodynamic stability, adverse events, secondary brain injury, and short-term clinical outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence to guide sedative selection in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury, particularly in settings where invasive intracranial pressure monitoring is not routinely available.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

210

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Asyut Governorate
      • Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egipto, 81528
        • Aswan university hospital
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years

    • Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury with post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤12
    • Undergone urgent neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, craniectomy, or ICP monitor placement) within 24 hours of injury
    • Admitted to ICU and expected to require continuous sedation
    • Hemodynamically stable or stabilized (defined as MAP ≥65 mmHg with vasopressor requirement ≤0.1 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalent)
    • Informed consent obtained from legally authorized representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The Relative refusal to participate in the research.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine
  • Pre-existing neurological disorders (epilepsy, prior stroke, brain tumors, dementia) that may interfere with outcome assessment
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh Class C) or acute liver failure
  • Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m² or requiring renal replacement therapy)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring norepinephrine >0.1 mcg/kg/min or equivalent vasopressor support
  • Heart rate <50 bpm or second/third-degree AV block without pacemaker (relative contraindication for dexmedetomidine)
  • Clinical determination of brain death or expected survival <24 hours
  • Enrollment in another interventional trial
  • Severe polytrauma requiring ongoing surgical interventions that would interfere with protocol adherence

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Propofol
Participants receive continuous intravenous propofol infusion initiated at 1 mg/kg/h and titrated to 1-4 mg/kg/h to maintain a target RASS score of -3 to -4 for 24 hours.
Continuous intravenous propofol infusion initiated at 1 mg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 1-4 mg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period.
Experimental: Midazolam
Participants receive continuous intravenous midazolam infusion initiated at 0.03 mg/kg/h and titrated to 0.02-0.1 mg/kg/h to maintain a target RASS score of -3 to -4 for 24 hours.
Continuous intravenous midazolam infusion initiated at 0.03 mg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 0.02-0.1 mg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period. An initial bolus dose of 0.05 mg/kg may be administered if rapid sedation is required.
Experimental: dexmedetomidine
Participants receive continuous intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion initiated at 0.4 μg/kg/h and titrated to 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h to maintain a target RASS score of -3 to -4 for 24 hours.
Continuous intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion initiated at 0.4 μg/kg/h and titrated within a range of 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h to maintain a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4 during the 24-hour study intervention period. No loading dose will be administered.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Intracranial Pressure Control Assessed by Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after initiation of sedation
Intracranial pressure control will be evaluated using serial optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements obtained by ocular ultrasonography. The primary outcome will be the mean ONSD over the 24-hour intervention period, analyzed as a continuous measure of intracranial pressure control.
Baseline, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after initiation of sedation

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Proportion of Time at Target Sedation Level
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
Percentage of assessment time during which patients maintained the target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of -3 to -4. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable). Higher scores indicate greater agitation, whereas lower scores indicate deeper sedation. The target sedation level for this study is RASS -3 to -4.
24 hours after initiation of sedation
Mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) Score
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
Mean Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score during the 24-hour intervention period. The RASS ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable), with target sedation defined as -3 to -4.
24 hours after initiation of sedation
Need for Rescue Sedation
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
Proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation due to failure to achieve target sedation despite maximum protocol dose.
24 hours after initiation of sedation
Time to Achieve Target Sedation
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of sedation
Time from initiation of study sedative infusion until achievement of target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score (-3 to -4).The RASS ranges from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable)
24 hours after initiation of sedation
Incidence of Hypotension
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation
Incidence of hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) <60 mmHg.
24 hours after initiation of study sedation
Vasopressor Requirements
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
Vasopressor requirements assessed by the proportion of patients requiring vasopressor support.
24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
Incidence of Bradycardia.
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
Percentage of participants who develop bradycardia, defined as a sustained heart rate <50 beats per minute (bpm).
24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Secondary Brain Injury ✅
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
Secondary brain injury will be assessed by the presence of new or progressive findings on brain computed tomography (CT) compared with baseline imaging, including new intracranial hemorrhage, progression of cerebral edema (defined as >25% increase in midline shift or worsening basal cistern effacement), new cerebral infarction, or transtentorial or uncal herniation. Brain CT scans will be reviewed by a blinded neuroradiologist.
Baseline and 24 hours after initiation of study sedation.
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Periodo de tiempo: From initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation, assessed for up to 30 days.
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, measured as the number of days from initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful liberation from ventilatory support.
From initiation of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation, assessed for up to 30 days.
Time to Neurological Awakening
Periodo de tiempo: From discontinuation of study sedation until achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale motor score of ≥5, assessed for up to 30 days.
Time from discontinuation of study sedation to achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor score of ≥5. The Glasgow Coma Scale motor component ranges from 1 (no motor response) to 6 (obeys commands), with higher scores indicating better neurological function.
From discontinuation of study sedation until achievement of a Glasgow Coma Scale motor score of ≥5, assessed for up to 30 days.
ICU Mortality
Periodo de tiempo: From ICU admission until ICU discharge, assessed for up to 30 days.
Death from any cause during the ICU stay following urgent neurosurgical intervention for traumatic brain injury.
From ICU admission until ICU discharge, assessed for up to 30 days.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Ahmed Elsaied Aly, Ph.D., Sohag University

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

20 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

24 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

1 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

1 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

24 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study contains sensitive clinical data, and sharing could compromise participant confidentiality. Data are subject to institutional policies and ethics committee restrictions.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir