Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Characterizing Perfusion and Congestion Responses to Fluid Loading in Critically Ill Septic Patients (FLUID-IMPACTS)

29 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and a major contributor to deaths in intensive care units. Early hemodynamic resuscitation, particularly fluid loading, is a cornerstone of septic shock management. However, the benefit-risk balance of fluid administration is difficult to assess in routine practice. Insufficient fluid resuscitation may result in persistent tissue hypoperfusion, organ ischemia, and multiorgan failure, whereas excessive fluid administration is associated with increased mortality, mainly due to systemic venous congestion and organ edema.

The concept of fluid tolerance, defined as the ability of a patient to receive fluids without developing harmful consequences related to fluid overload, is increasingly recognized. Nevertheless, its evaluation remains challenging because of the lack of validated tools and consensual thresholds. In addition, although several markers of tissue perfusion and systemic venous congestion have been described, their combined clinical relevance and prognostic value following fluid loading in septic shock have not been specifically evaluated.

This study aims to assess perfusion and congestion responses to fluid loading in patients with septic shock. The primary objective is to compare patients according to changes in tissue perfusion markers (lactate concentration, mottling score, capillary refill time, venous-to-arterial CO₂ gradient, and central venous oxygen saturation) and systemic venous congestion markers (central venous pressure and hepatic and portal vein Doppler indices) after fluid administration. Secondary objectives include evaluating the evolution of venous congestion markers and their association with organ dysfunction within 48 hours, the relationship between post-fluid loading congestion dynamics and 28-day mortality, and identifying pre-fluid loading predictors of patients who fail to improve tissue perfusion while exhibiting worsening venous congestion.

This is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional observational cohort study conducted in five intensive care units. Eligible patients are adult patients with septic shock, mechanically ventilated, equipped with arterial and central venous catheters, and presenting a positive passive leg-raising test defined as an increase greater than 10% in cardiac output or left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral. All patients receive standard care in accordance with international guidelines, and fluid administration is entirely at the discretion of the treating physician.

Clinical, biological, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic data are collected before and after fluid loading. Patients are retrospectively classified into four groups based on the presence or absence of improvement in tissue perfusion and worsening of venous congestion. Follow-up continues until ICU discharge or day 28.

Approximately 280 patients are expected to be screened to include 170 patients. The results may help identify patients who are fluid responsive in terms of cardiac output but at risk of harmful venous congestion, supporting more individualized fluid resuscitation strategies in septic shock.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

All patients receive standard care in accordance with current international guidelines. The decision to administer fluids, the type of crystalloid, and the infused volume are at the discretion of the treating physician.

Study data are collected at predefined time points before and after fluid resuscitation and include routinely measured clinical, biological, and hemodynamic parameters, as well as echocardiographic Doppler indices of systemic venous congestion. Patients are retrospectively classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of improvement in tissue perfusion markers and worsening of venous congestion markers. Follow-up continues until ICU discharge or day 28, with collection of organ dysfunction scores, fluid balance, and mortality data.

Based on previous data, approximately 280 patients are expected to be screened to include 170 patients, allowing meaningful comparisons across groups. The inclusion period is 23 months, with a 28-day follow-up and a total study duration of 24 months. Statistical analyses will compare groups using appropriate parametric or nonparametric tests, survival analysis using Cox proportional hazards models, and predictive modeling assessed by ROC curve analysis.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

170

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Adrien JOSEPH, MD, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: +33 1 49 09 44 09
  • Correo electrónico: adrien.joseph@aphp.fr

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Boulogne-Billancourt, Francia, 92100
        • Hôpital Ambroise Paré, APHP

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Patients with septic shock, defined according to proven or suspected infection with hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy, either community or hospital onset.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with septic shock, defined according to proven or suspected infection with hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy, either community or hospital onset.
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Central venous catheter in the superior vena cava territory
  • Arterial catheter in place
  • Positive passive leg-raising (PLR) test-defined as an increase of >10% in subaortic velocity-time integral-which predicts responsiveness to fluid loading.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to performing a passive leg-raising manoeuvre (e.g., unstable spinal fracture, intracranial hypertension, critical limb ischemia).
  • Age < 18 years.
  • Lack of social coverage or individuals deprived of liberty.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (veno-venous or venoarterial)
  • Cirrhosis with portal hypertension or portal vein thrombosis
  • Inability to obtain non-opposition from the patient or their legal representative.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Patient classification 1 hour after completion of fluid loading
Periodo de tiempo: at 1 hour

The primary objective of the study is to determine the proportion of patients belonging to the four categories defined by changes in tissue perfusion markers and systemic venous congestion markers, one hour after fluid load.

Group 1 : Improvement in tissue perfusion markers with no worsening of systemic venous congestion markers Group 2 : Improvement in tissue perfusion markers with worsening of systemic venous congestion markers Group 3 : No improvement in tissue perfusion markers with no worsening of systemic venous congestion markers Group 4 : No improvement in tissue perfusion markers with worsening of systemic venous congestion markers

Tissue perfusion will be assessed using blood lactate concentration, central venous oxygen saturation, venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference, mottling score and capillary refill time.

Systemic venous congestion will be assessed using portal vein pulsatility, hepatic vein doppler S/D ratio and central venous pressure.

at 1 hour
Change in SOFA score from baseline to 48 hours after fluid loading
Periodo de tiempo: at 48 hours
Assessing the association between the 4 group classification mentionned above and organ dysfunction (defined as a increase in SOFA score components) within the 48 hours following fluid administration.
at 48 hours

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Day 28 mortality
Periodo de tiempo: at 28 days
Assessing the association between the 4 group classification mentionned above and day-28 mortality.
at 28 days
Identifying pre-fluid loading predictors
Periodo de tiempo: at 28 days
Identifying pre-fluid loading predictors of belonging to the subgroup of patients who fail to show improvement in tissue perfusion and who demonstrate worsening systemic venous congestion.
at 28 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de junio de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de enero de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

6 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

6 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir