Comparative Effects of Different Inspiratory Muscle Training Modalities in Patients With Heart Failure. (IMT-HF-COMPARE)

This clinical trial aims to explore the underlying physiological mechanisms and comparative systemic adaptations of mechanical pressure-threshold versus electronic flow-resistive inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Patients with HFrEF frequently exhibit respiratory muscle weakness, which triggers an early activation of the inspiratory muscle metaboreflex. This reflex increases sympathetic vasoconstrictor drive to active locomotor muscles, accelerating peripheral fatigue, exacerbating dyspnea, and limiting overall exercise tolerance.

To systematically address these mechanisms, the protocol is structured into a precise multi-stage timeline distributed over 8 consecutive weeks:

1. Methodological Familiarization and Baseline Testing (Weeks 1-2):

   To eliminate the confounding "learning effect" and ensure internal data validity, the first two weeks are exclusively dedicated to patient technical habituation. Participants will learn proper diaphragmatic breathing techniques, device interface seal (using flanged mouthpieces and nose clips), and device manipulation under submaximal loads. Concurrently, baseline clinical profiling will be conducted, including spirometry, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), resting cardiac autonomic balance through Heart Rate Variability (HRV), and central vascular stiffness via Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV).

2. High-Intensity Standardized Intervention (Weeks 3-8):

   The formal training phase lasts 6 weeks with a frequency of 3 supervised sessions per week, totaling 18 effective sessions. To preserve biomechanical quality and prevent disproportionate dyspnea or early neuromuscular fatigue in this clinical population, the training volume is strictly set to 5 sets of 8 repetitions (40 breathing efforts per session), separated by standardized resting intervals.

   The progression scheme utilizes a linear model based on the initial baseline MIP, preventing the logistical friction of constant maximum re-testing in fragile patients:

   • Weeks 3-4: 60% of baseline MIP (Groups 1 and 2) or 15% (Group 3).
   • Weeks 5-6: Progression to 70% of baseline MIP (Groups 1 and 2) or 15% (Group 3).
   • Weeks 7-8: Progression to 80% of baseline MIP (Groups 1 and 2) or 15% (Group 3).

3. Advanced Dynamic Evaluations:

   • Muscle Oxygenation and Metaboreflex Provocation (NIRS): Peripheral blood flow redistribution and tissue oxygen saturation kinetics (SmO2) will be tracked continuously via three percutaneous Near-Infrared Spectroscopy sensors (Moxy Monitor®) placed simultaneously on the right intercostal space (respiratory pump), vastus lateralis of the quadriceps (locomotor reference), and the dominant forearm flexor mass (non-locomotor control). The provocation protocol includes an inspiratory resistive load test at 60% MIP until task failure (inability to sustain target pressure for three consecutive breaths), followed immediately by an isometric Handgrip peripheral fatigue protocol (12 repetitions of 10-second maximal voluntary contractions with 30-second rests).
   • Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET): Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) will be evaluated using a cycle ergometer under an incremental ramp protocol. Following the recommendations of Tuesta et al. (2023), the workload increase rate will be individually tailored based on the patient's NYHA functional class: 5 W/min for Class IV, 6-7 W/min for Class III, 8-9 W/min for Class II, and 9 W/min or more for Class I, targeting an optimal test duration between 8 and 12 minutes to peak exhaustion.