- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07701109
Individualized Discharge Education in High-Risk Myocardial Infarction Patients (MI)
The Effect of Individualized Discharge Education on Readmission Rates in a High-Risk Population According to the LACE Index After Myocardial Infarction
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Reva G GÜNDOĞAN, Asst. Prof.
- Número de teléfono: +905551822097
- Correo electrónico: r4a5reva@gmail.com
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Besni
-
Adıyaman, Besni, Turquía (Türkiye), 02100
- Adıyaman University
-
Contacto:
- Reva GÜNDOĞAN, Asst. Prof.
- Número de teléfono: 05551822097
- Correo electrónico: r4a5reva@gmail.com
-
Contacto:
- Sevim Güler, Nurse PhD
- Número de teléfono: +905055894983
- Correo electrónico: sdegerguler@gmail.com
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being over 18 years of age,
- Not having a cognitive disorder,
- Not having a history of psychiatric disorders,
- Being open to communication,
- Not having hearing, visual or speech impairments,
- Having a LACE index score of 10 or higher,
- Being willing to participate in the research.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Having a LACE index score below 10
- Not having a cognitive impairment,
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Individualized discharge education group
Experimental arm
|
Education will cover the following topics: Disease Knowledge and Process Management: Definition of myocardial infarction, long-term management of the disease, risk of recurrence, and recognition of complication symptoms. Adherence to Medication Therapy: Regular use of medications, their effects, and methods of administration. Management of Comorbidities: Monitoring and managing existing co-occurring conditions as part of the overall care plan. Self-Care and Lifestyle Modifications: Nutrition: Adopting low-fat dietary habits that support heart health. Physical Activity: The importance of regular exercise and a safe activity plan. Risk Factor Control: Smoking cessation and avoiding smoke-filled environments, weight control, and blood pressure monitoring. Symptom Management: Recognizing potential symptoms and the necessary actions to take in such situations . Psychosocial Support: Strategies for managing disease-related stress and improving quality of life. |
|
Sin intervención: Control group
Control arm
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
LACE index
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
LACE (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidity, Emergency department visits) Index: The LACE index was first developed by van Walraven et al. to estimate the risk of unplanned readmission or death within 30 days of hospital discharge in medical and surgical patients.
The model was derived and validated based on administrative data with a C-statistic of 0.68.
The model includes length of hospital stay (L), severity of admission (A), comorbidities of patients (C), and the number of emergency department visits within six months prior to admission (E).
Scores ranging from "0" to "19" and greater than ten are considered a high risk for 30-day readmission.
Higher scores indicate a high risk of readmission.
This tool is widely used primarily due to its simplicity and usability in daily clinical practice.
|
Day 1
|
|
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Information Needs Scale (NCPI-10)
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Information Needs Scale (NCPI-10): This scale is a 10-item scale that assesses the information needs of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .
The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Tüllüce et al. in 2025.
A four-point Likert scale was used to answer all items in the scale.
The total score of each result is between 10-40.
As the importance level score of the information need increases, the importance level for the patient increases.
As the level of fulfillment of the information need score increases, the level of fulfillment of the needs increases.
The Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scales was found to be 0.98 for the importance level of the information need and 0.98 for the degree of fulfillment.
|
Day 1
|
|
The Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI)
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
The Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI) was developed by Dickson et al. to assess the self-care levels of individuals with coronary heart disease.
Its Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Bayrak and Oğuz (2020).
The scale consists of 22 items and three sub-dimensions: maintaining self-care (10 items), managing self-care (6 items), and self-care confidence (6 items).
Items are generally scored on a Likert scale from 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, and 4=always, with some items in the self-care management sub-dimension being rated between 0 and 4. A total score is not obtained from the scale; each sub-dimension is evaluated separately, and higher scores indicate a better level of self-care.
In the Turkish adaptation study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the scale were found to be 0.63 for maintaining self-care, 0.76 for managing self-care, and 0.95 for self-care confidence.
|
Day 1
|
|
Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) Scale: The Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) Scale was developed to measure quality of life in individuals with ischemic heart disease .
A Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Duğan & Bektaş in 2020.
The original scale included patients with angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and ischemic heart failure within ischemic heart disease.
The scale consists of 14 items, divided into two sub-dimensions: physical (10 items; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14) and emotional characteristics (4 items; 9, 10, 11, 12).
Each item in the HeartQoL Scale is scored between 0 and 3; 3 represents "no discomfort" and 0 represents "very discomfort".
In the evaluation of the scale, high scores indicate the absence of dysfunction.
The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was found to be 0.88 overall, and between 0.74 and 0.87 in its sub-dimensions.
|
Day 1
|
|
Personal Information Form
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Personal Information Form: Prepared by researchers through a literature review, this form will include 22 questions covering socioeconomic and disease information, as well as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, and BMI values.
|
Day 1
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
The Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI)
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1, first month and third month
|
The Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI) was developed by Dickson et al. to assess the self-care levels of individuals with coronary heart disease.
Its Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Bayrak and Oğuz (2020) .
The scale consists of 22 items and three sub-dimensions: maintaining self-care (10 items), managing self-care (6 items), and self-care confidence (6 items).
Items are generally scored on a Likert scale from 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, and 4=always, with some items in the self-care management sub-dimension being rated between 0 and 4. A total score is not obtained from the scale; each sub-dimension is evaluated separately, and higher scores indicate a better level of self-care.
In the Turkish adaptation study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the scale were found to be 0.63 for maintaining self-care, 0.76 for managing self-care, and 0.95 for self-care confidence.
|
Day 1, first month and third month
|
|
Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) Scale: The Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1, first month and third month
|
Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) Scale: The Heart Quality of Life (HeartQoL) Scale was developed to measure quality of life in individuals with ischemic heart disease .
A Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Duğan & Bektaş in 2020.
The original scale included patients with angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and ischemic heart failure within ischemic heart disease.
The scale consists of 14 items, divided into two sub-dimensions: physical (10 items; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14) and emotional characteristics (4 items; 9, 10, 11, 12).
Each item in the HeartQoL Scale is scored between 0 and 3; 3 represents "no discomfort" and 0 represents "very discomfort".
In the evaluation of the scale, high scores indicate the absence of dysfunction.
The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was found to be 0.88 overall, and between 0.74 and 0.87 in its sub-dimensions .
|
Day 1, first month and third month
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Reva G GÜNDOĞAN, Asst. Prof., Adiyaman University
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Zhang P, Hu YD, Xing FM, Li CZ, Lan WF, Zhang XL. Effects of a nurse-led transitional care program on clinical outcomes, health-related knowledge, physical and mental health status among Chinese patients with coronary artery disease: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Sep;74:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
- Vaughan Dickson V, Lee CS, Yehle KS, Mola A, Faulkner KM, Riegel B. Psychometric Testing of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI). Res Nurs Health. 2017 Feb;40(1):15-22. doi: 10.1002/nur.21755. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
- Lizcano-Alvarez A, Carretero-Julian L, Talavera-Saez A, Cristobal-Zarate B, Cid-Exposito MG, Alameda-Cuesta A; REccAP Group (Red de Enfermeria de Cuidados Cardiovasculares en Atencion Primaria). Intensive nurse-led follow-up in primary care to improve self-management and compliance behaviour after myocardial infarction. Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5211-5224. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1758. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
- Oldridge N, Hofer S, McGee H, Conroy R, Doyle F, Saner H; (for the HeartQoL Project Investigators). The HeartQoL: part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;21(1):98-106. doi: 10.1177/2047487312450545. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
- Bayrak B, Oguz S. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory. Int J Nurs Pract. 2021 Feb;27(1):e12847. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12847. Epub 2020 May 5.
- Tsoulou V, Vasilopoulos G, Kapadohos T, Panoutsopoulos G, Kalogianni A, Toulia G, Koutelekos I, Gerogianni G, Polikandrioti M. Information Needs in Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention: Validation and Reliability Analysis of NPCI-10 Item Scale. Cureus. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):e12718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12718.
- Yazdan-Ashoori P, Lee SF, Ibrahim Q, Van Spall HG. Utility of the LACE index at the bedside in predicting 30-day readmission or death in patients hospitalized with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2016 Sep;179:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
- Duğan, Ö., & Bektaş, H. (2020). Koroner arter hastalarında Kalp Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. Turkish Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 11(25), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.5543/khd.2020.38278
- Rajaguru V, Han W, Kim TH, Shin J, Lee SG. LACE Index to Predict the High Risk of 30-Day Readmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 30;12(4):545. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040545.
- Robinson R, Bhattarai M, Hudali T, Vogler C. Predictors of 30-day hospital readmission: The direct comparison of number of discharge medications to the HOSPITAL score and LACE index. Future Healthc J. 2019 Oct;6(3):209-214. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2018-0039.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 2026/4-21
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .