Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Transperineal Versus Transrectal Cognitive Fusion Prostate Biopsy (PROCOG)

14 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Muhammed Yusuf Aydın, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Cognitive Fusion Prostate Biopsy for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients With mpMRI-Detected Suspicious Lesions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare transperineal and transrectal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy techniques in patients with suspicious prostate lesions detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).

Patients aged 50-75 years with PI-RADS 3-5 lesions on mpMRI and an indication for prostate biopsy will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either transperineal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy or transrectal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether transperineal cognitive fusion biopsy is non-inferior to transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Secondary objectives include comparison of overall prostate cancer detection rates, detection of Gleason Grade Group ≥2 prostate cancer, biopsy-related infectious complications, other procedure-related complications, pain scores, and procedure duration.

A total of 280 participants will be enrolled. Pathological evaluation will be performed after biopsy, and clinical outcomes and complications will be assessed during follow-up.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies among men. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has become an important tool for prostate cancer detection and risk stratification, particularly with the use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Patients with PI-RADS 3-5 lesions are frequently considered candidates for targeted prostate biopsy.

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy has traditionally been the standard biopsy approach. However, the transrectal route may carry a risk of infectious complications due to passage through rectal mucosa and exposure to rectal flora. Transperineal prostate biopsy has gained increasing interest because it avoids transgression of the rectal mucosa and may reduce infectious complications.

Cognitive fusion biopsy is an MRI-targeted biopsy technique in which mpMRI findings are mentally correlated with real-time ultrasound images by the operator. This technique provides an accessible alternative to software-based fusion systems and can achieve accurate targeted sampling when performed by experienced clinicians.

The aim of this study is to prospectively compare transperineal and transrectal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy techniques regarding diagnostic performance and safety outcomes in patients with PI-RADS 3-5 lesions detected on mpMRI.

Eligible participants aged 50-75 years with biopsy indications will be randomized using a computer-generated stratified block randomization method. Randomization will be stratified according to PI-RADS category (3, 4, or 5) and age group (<60 years and ≥60 years).

Participants will undergo either transperineal or transrectal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy according to their assigned study group. Systematic biopsy cores and targeted biopsy cores will be obtained according to the institutional protocol.

The primary endpoint is the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥2 (ISUP Grade Group ≥2) prostate cancer. The primary analysis will evaluate non-inferiority of transperineal biopsy compared with transrectal biopsy.

Secondary endpoints include overall prostate cancer detection rate, Gleason Grade Group ≥2 cancer detection, infectious complications (fever, urinary infection, prostatitis, sepsis), procedure-related complications (hematuria, hematospermia, urinary retention), pain assessed by visual analog scale (VAS), and procedure duration.

Participants will be followed for 30 days after biopsy for assessment of adverse events and complications.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

280

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: MUHAMMED Y AYDIN, Doctor
  • Número de teléfono: +90 +90 554 838 4510
  • Correo electrónico: mysfa63@gmail.com

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

  • Nombre: ALPER G GÖK, PROFESSOR DOCTOR
  • Número de teléfono: +90 532 603 1181
  • Correo electrónico: alper_gok@hotmail.com

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Yenimahalle
      • Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turquía (Türkiye), 06170
        • Reclutamiento
        • Ankara Etlik City Hospital
        • Contacto:
          • ALPER GOK, Proffessor Doctor
          • Número de teléfono: +90 532 603 11 81
          • Correo electrónico: alper_gok@hotmail.com

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients aged 50-75 years.
  • Patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 lesions detected on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).
  • Patients with an indication for prostate biopsy.
  • Patients who are willing to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of prostate cancer.
  • Active urinary tract infection.
  • Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders preventing prostate biopsy.
  • Absence of multiparametric prostate MRI evaluation.
  • No indication for prostate biopsy.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Transrectal Cognitive Fusion Prostate Biopsy
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo transrectal cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsy combined with systematic prostate biopsy according to the institutional protocol.
Cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsy performed through the transrectal approach using multiparametric MRI findings for lesion targeting, combined with systematic prostate biopsy.
Experimental: Transperineal Cognitive Fusion Prostate Biopsy
Participants randomized to this arm will undergo transperineal cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsy combined with systematic prostate biopsy according to the institutional protocol.
Cognitive fusion targeted prostate biopsy performed through the transperineal approach using multiparametric MRI findings for lesion targeting, combined with systematic prostate biopsy.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate
Periodo de tiempo: Within 4 weeks after biopsy (after final pathological evaluation)
Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates between transperineal and transrectal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy techniques. Clinically significant prostate cancer is defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥2 (ISUP Grade Group ≥2) prostate cancer.
Within 4 weeks after biopsy (after final pathological evaluation)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Overall prostate cancer detection rate
Periodo de tiempo: Within 4 weeks after biopsy (after final pathological evaluation)
Comparison of overall prostate cancer detection rates between transperineal and transrectal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy techniques
Within 4 weeks after biopsy (after final pathological evaluation)
Post-biopsy infectious complications
Periodo de tiempo: Within 30 days after biopsy
Assessment and comparison of infectious complications including fever, urinary infection, prostatitis, and sepsis after prostate biopsy.
Within 30 days after biopsy
Post-biopsy procedure-related complications
Periodo de tiempo: Within 30 days after biopsy
Assessment and comparison of procedure-related complications including hematuria, hematospermia, urethral bleeding, and urinary retention.
Within 30 days after biopsy
Pain score after biopsy procedure
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately after biopsy procedure
Assessment of patient-reported pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after biopsy.
Immediately after biopsy procedure
Procedure duration
Periodo de tiempo: During biopsy procedure
Comparison of procedure duration between transperineal and transrectal cognitive fusion prostate biopsy techniques.
During biopsy procedure

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de junio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de marzo de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

14 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

17 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

17 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir