Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Randomized Study of Triple Therapy vs Sildenafil Dose Optimization in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (ASCEND-PAH)

28 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Caio Júlio César dos Santos Fernandes, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Triple Therapy Versus Sildenafil Dose Optimization in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using COMPERA 2.0 Risk Stratification as the Primary Outcome

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease characterized by increased pressure in the pulmonary arteries, leading to right heart failure and premature death. Although combination therapy has improved outcomes, many patients remain at intermediate or high clinical risk despite treatment.

When patients do not reach low-risk status, treatment escalation is recommended. However, different escalation strategies are used in clinical practice, including increasing the dose of existing medications or adding a third drug that targets a different biological pathway. There is limited prospective randomized evidence directly comparing these approaches.

The ASCEND-PAH study is a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial designed to compare two therapeutic escalation strategies in adults with PAH who remain at intermediate or high risk despite dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and sildenafil. Participants will be randomized to either: (1) escalation to triple therapy with the addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent, or (2) optimization of dual therapy by increasing the dose of sildenafil.

The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients who improve their risk category according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum risk model within 3 to 6 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include changes in functional status, exercise capacity, biomarkers, clinical worsening, safety, and treatment persistence

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial designed to evaluate therapeutic escalation strategies in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, Group 1) who remain at intermediate-low, intermediate-high, or high risk according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model despite stable dual therapy.

Eligible participants must be receiving an endothelin receptor antagonist in combination with sildenafil and have a clinical indication for treatment escalation. After confirmation of eligibility and baseline assessments, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two strategies:

Escalation to triple therapy through addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent (inhaled iloprost or selexipag), according to clinical judgment and availability.

Optimization of dual therapy by increasing the dose of sildenafil according to clinical practice.

Baseline assessments may include WHO functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and BNP or NT-proBNP levels obtained within 90 days prior to randomization. Follow-up evaluation will occur between 3 and 6 months after randomization, with the primary analysis based on the assessment closest to 6 months within that window.

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve improvement in risk stratification, defined as a decrease of at least one risk category according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model. Secondary endpoints include composite clinical improvement and worsening, change in individual clinical parameters, time to clinical worsening, safety outcomes, need for additional therapeutic escalation, and treatment persistence.

The study is powered to detect a clinically meaningful absolute difference of 20 percentage points in risk improvement between groups, with planned enrollment of approximately 196 participants to account for potential losses to follow-up

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

196

Fase

  • Fase 4

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Brasil
    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil, 04551-060
        • Reclutamiento
        • Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, Group 1) confirmed according to accepted clinical and hemodynamic criteria
  • Stable treatment with an endothelin receptor antagonist in combination with sildenafil prior to randomization
  • Classified as intermediate-low, intermediate-high, or high risk according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model
  • Clinical indication for therapeutic escalation
  • Availability for follow-up assessment between 3 and 6 months after randomization
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that mandates treatment modification
  • Known contraindication to prostacyclin pathway agents (including iloprost or selexipag)
  • Known contraindication to sildenafil dose escalation
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
  • Any clinical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would interfere with study participation or outcome assessment

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Sildenafil Dose Optimization
Participants will continue dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and sildenafil, with optimization of sildenafil dose according to clinical practice. No additional pulmonary arterial hypertension pathway agent will be added at randomization. Treatment adjustments after randomization will be recorded if clinically required.
Droga: Sildenafil Dose Optimization
Optimization of sildenafil dose within approved dosing ranges as part of dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist. Dose adjustments will be performed according to clinical practice to achieve maximal tolerated and guideline-recommended dosing without addition of a new PAH pathway agent at randomization.
Otros nombres:
  • Sildenafilo
Experimental: Triple Therapy Escalation (Inhaled Iloprost or Selexipag)
Participants will receive escalation to triple therapy through addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent (inhaled iloprost or selexipag) to ongoing dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and sildenafil. The specific prostacyclin pathway agent will be selected according to clinical judgment and availability. Participants will remain on triple therapy during follow-up unless modification is clinically indicated.
Droga: Prostacyclin Pathway Agent
Addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent (inhaled iloprost or oral selexipag) to ongoing dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and sildenafil as part of therapeutic escalation to triple therapy. The specific agent will be selected according to clinical judgment and availability. Dosing will follow approved labeling and routine clinical practice.
Otros nombres:
  • Selexipag
  • Iloprost

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Improvement in Risk Stratification According to the COMPERA 2.0 Four-Stratum Model
Periodo de tiempo: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization (assessment closest to 6 months within the predefined window)
Proportion of participants who achieve improvement in clinical risk category between baseline and follow-up, defined as a decrease of at least one risk category according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model (low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, high risk). Risk status is determined using World Health Organization functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and BNP or NT-proBNP levels, when available.
Between 3 and 6 months after randomization (assessment closest to 6 months within the predefined window)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Composite Clinical Improvement at 3-6 Months
Periodo de tiempo: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Proportion of participants who achieve composite clinical improvement between baseline and follow-up (3-6 months), defined as improvement in at least two of the following without worsening in any: (1) improvement of ≥1 WHO functional class; (2) increase of ≥30 meters in 6-minute walk distance; (3) reduction of ≥30% in BNP or NT-proBNP levels.
Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Composite Clinical Worsening
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization through 6 months of follow-up
Occurrence of clinical worsening defined as any of the following during follow-up: worsening of ≥1 WHO functional class; decrease of ≥30 meters in 6-minute walk distance; increase of ≥30% in BNP or NT-proBNP; need for additional therapeutic escalation; hospitalization related to pulmonary arterial hypertension; or death from any cause.
From randomization through 6 months of follow-up
Change in WHO Functional Class
Periodo de tiempo: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Change in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class between baseline and follow-up. WHO functional class ranges from I (least severe) to IV (most severe), with higher classes indicating worse functional limitation.
Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
Periodo de tiempo: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Absolute change in 6-minute walk distance (meters) between baseline and follow-up assessment.
Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Change in BNP or NT-proBNP Levels
Periodo de tiempo: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Percent change in BNP or NT-proBNP levels between baseline and follow-up. Higher values indicate greater cardiac strain and worse prognosis.
Between 3 and 6 months after randomization
Time to Clinical Worsening
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization through 6 months of follow-up
Time from randomization to first occurrence of clinical worsening event as defined in the composite clinical worsening outcome.
From randomization through 6 months of follow-up
Treatment Persistence
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization through 6 months of follow-up
Proportion of participants who remain on their initially assigned therapeutic strategy without permanent discontinuation by the follow-up visit.
From randomization through 6 months of follow-up
Safety and Adverse Events
Periodo de tiempo: From randomization through 6 months
Incidence, type, and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events occurring during the study period.
From randomization through 6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Caio Fernandes, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

22 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

14 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

20 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

30 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • CAAE: 97708926.6.0000.0068

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir