Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

SST in Emergency Education (SST)

The Application of Scenario Simulation Teaching and Confidence Behavior Evaluation in Emergency Medicine Teaching

This study looks back at how the investigatorsll two different teaching methods work for training medical and nursing students in CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation), a life-saving emergency procedure used when someone's heart stops. the investigators want to find out whether learning through realistic emergency case simulations helps students gain better skills and knowledge than traditional classroom lectures.

The study reviews training records of medical and nursing interns-students in their first hands-on hospital training-who completed CPR training betthe investigatorsen September 2024 and November 2025. the investigators included students who had no prior CPR certification and who attended most of their training sessions.

Because this is a retrospective study, no one needs to take part in any new activities or visits. Researchers will analyze existing training records, test scores, and anonymous survey responses that the investigatorsre already collected during past training sessions. One group of students learned CPR through traditional lectures and instructor demonstrations. The other group learned through hands-on case-based simulations, where they practiced working together as a medical team in realistic emergency scenarios.

This research may help hospitals choose better ways to teach CPR to future doctors and nurses. If case-based simulation proves more effective, more students could receive this type of training, which may help them respond more confidently and effectively in real-life emergencies. Ultimately, better-prepared healthcare professionals may improve care for patients experiencing cardiac arrest.

There are no direct risks to participants. The study only uses existing anonymous teaching records, and no personal identities will be shared in any study reports.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Descripción detallada

Clinical clerkship in emergency medicine represents a critical transition period for medical students, bridging the gap from theoretical knowledge to practical application. The traditional "didactic lecture + bedside teaching" model has the investigatorsll-documented limitations, including disconnection betthe investigatorsen theory and practice, passive student engagement, and insufficient training in clinical reasoning.

In recent years, innovative pedagogical models-such as the Flipped Classroom (FC) combined with the SNAPPS structured clinical reasoning framework, and Case-Based Scenario Simulation Teaching (CBSST)-have demonstrated promising outcomes in emergency and critical care medical education. While traditional lecture-based instruction falls short in fostering active learning and critical thinking, case-based scenario simulation immerses learners in highly realistic clinical contexts, enabling interns to experience the urgency of emergency care before actual clinical practice and to master the core elements of team-based resuscitation.

Entrustable Professional Activities, EPAs has gained increasing recognition in healthcare training. Simulation-based collaborative training betthe investigatorsen medical and nursing students improves role clarification, facilitates task coordination, and narrows knowledge-system gaps betthe investigatorsen disciplines. Hothe investigatorsver, existing studies have largely focused on general clinical skills rather than specifically targeting CPR scenarios involving collaborative medical-nursing intern teams. Furthermore, there is a paucity of systematic evaluations regarding the effectiveness of case-based scenario simulation in this specific context.

Previous single-center randomized controlled trials have shown that the FC+SNAPPS model significantly improves interns' theoretical knowledge, Mini-CEX clinical core competencies (history taking, physical examination, clinical assessment, and clinical judgment), and teaching satisfaction. Similarly, CBSST has been shown to simultaneously enhance theoretical scores, procedural skills, clinical judgment, and teamwork among medical and nursing interns during CPR training. Nevertheless, current research remains limited in several aspects:

  1. Limited evaluation dimensions: Most studies rely on immediate theoretical examinations and Mini-CEX skill scores as primary outcomes, lacking assessment of whether trainees "can be trusted to perform professional activities independently"-a core competency indicator.
  2. Insufficient model comparison: Existing studies predominantly compare a single innovative model against conventional instruction, with little direct comparison betthe investigatorsen different innovative models or exploration of synergistic effects.
  3. Limited external validity: Single-center, small-sample designs restrict generalizability.
  4. Unknown long-term effects: There is a lack of longitudinal follow-up regarding knowledge retention, skill maintenance, and clinical entrustment decision-making capacity.

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) represent a competency-based core assessment framework in medical education, emphasizing supervising physicians' entrustment decisions regarding whether a learner can independently execute a specific clinical activity. EPA evaluation extends beyond "can they do it" (knowledge and skills) to encompass trust and behavioral competence, aligning closely with the high-risk, practice-intensive nature of emergency medicine. Incorporating EPA as a guiding evaluation tool can compensate for the limitations of traditional Mini-CEX in assessing "independent decision-making and responsibility-bearing," thereby providing more clinically practical evidence for teaching model reform.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

69

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Hangzhou, Porcelana
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra de probabilidad

Población de estudio

Enrolled 69 medical and nursing interns rotating at our hospital from September 2024 to November 2025.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First-time clinical internship;
  • No prior BLS certification;
  • Attendance rate ≥ 90%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Leave of absence ≥10% during the training period;
  • Withdrawal from the study for other reasons after enrollment.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
control group
Received conventional lecture-based CPR training.
intervention group
received case-based scenario simulation teaching with interprofessional team training, consisting of five stages
The intervention group received case-based scenario simulation teaching with interprofessional team training, consisting of five stages

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
theoretical exam
Periodo de tiempo: up to 2 weeks
The assessment included a theoretical exam (maximum score: 100 points)
up to 2 weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Mini-CEX Scores
Periodo de tiempo: up to 2 weeks
Prior to the study, both assessors participated in a 2-hour calibration session reviewing standardized Mini-CEX rating criteria and benchmark video recordings. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient based on 10 independently scored pilot cases. The kappa value was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72-0.98), indicating excellent agreement between the two assessors. The Mini-CEX scoring system uses a three-level, 9-point scale, which is categorized as follows: Needs Improvement (1-3 points, indicating very poor, poor, and average), Pass (4-6 points, indicating good, moderate, and fair), and Excellent (7-9 points, indicating excellent, very good, and exceeding expectations). This evaluation system covers four dimensions: knowledge mastery, operational skills, clinical judgment, and team collaboration, with a maximum score of 36 points
up to 2 weeks
Questionnaire Survey
Periodo de tiempo: up to 2 weeks

The satisfaction questionnaire was developed based on established dimensions of instructional design and learner engagement identified in health professions education literature[8], and adapted for the specific context of CPR simulation training. Content validity was ensured through review by a panel of three clinical education experts (including BLS instructors and medical educators), who evaluated the relevance, comprehensiveness, and representativeness of the five dimensions (course content, course resources, classroom interaction, teaching methods, and learning burden) and confirmed that all items adequately reflected the constructs of interest in simulation-based CPR education.

Prior to formal administration, the questionnaire underwent pilot testing with 10 medical and nursing interns who were not included in the main study sample. The pilot test confirmed the clarity of item wording, logical flow of dimensions, and appropriateness of the 5-point rating scale. Internal consisten

up to 2 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2024

Finalización primaria (Actual)

30 de noviembre de 2025

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

30 de diciembre de 2025

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

25 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

31 de agosto de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

4 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

31 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2026-0693
  • 20230242,20240410 (Otro número de subvención/financiamiento: Teaching reform research and cultivation project of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Med)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Due to institutional data privacy policies and the retrospective use of anonymized teaching records, individual participant data cannot be shared outside the research team to protect trainee confidentiality.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir