Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Effectiveness and Implementation of a School-based Mental Well-being Intervention Among Adolescents of Bharatpur, Nepal (CROSSMIND_NP)

3 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: University of Aarhus

Adaptation, Effectiveness and Implementation of a School-Based Mental Well-Being Intervention (CROSS-MIND) Among Adolescents of Bharatpur Metropolitan, Chitwan, Nepal

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and assess the implementation of CROSS-MIND, a school-based mental well-being intervention for adolescents in Nepal. The study uses a Hybrid Type 1 mixed-methods design. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does CROSS-MIND improve students' mental well-being, self-esteem, and behavioural and emotional outcomes compared with usual school activities? Is CROSS-MIND acceptable, feasible, appropriate, and delivered with adequate fidelity, and what barriers and facilitators influence its delivery by teachers?

For the effectiveness evaluation, classes of grades 6 to 10 in five schools in Bharatpur Metropolitan City will be randomly assigned to receive either the CROSS-MIND intervention or usual school activities. Students will complete questionnaires before and after the intervention. Students in intervention classes will participate in eight weekly storytelling and reflection sessions of approximately 90 minutes, delivered by trained teachers. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions will also be conducted with selected students, teachers, school principals, and psychologists to explore experiences of the intervention and factors influencing its implementation.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Adolescent mental well-being is an important public health concern, and schools provide an appropriate setting for universal mental health promotion interventions. This study aims to evaluate CROSS-MIND, a school-based mental well-being intervention designed for adolescents in Nepal.

The effectiveness component is a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial in which classes from five schools in Bharatpur Metropolitan City will be randomly assigned to either the CROSS-MIND intervention or usual school activities. Students in Grades 6-10 will participate in baseline and endline assessments. The primary outcome is mental well-being measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS). Secondary outcomes include self-esteem, behavioural and emotional problems, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms, measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), PHQ-9-A, and GAD-7-A, respectively.

CROSS-MIND consists of eight weekly storytelling circle sessions of approximately 90 minutes, delivered by trained teachers within the school setting. The intervention uses structured storytelling, reflection, creative expression, and group discussion to support positive self-identity, emotional awareness, social connectedness, coping skills, and psychological well-being.

The study also includes an implementation component. Implementation will be assessed in terms of acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and fidelity. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions will explore participants' experiences and identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

1060

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Liladhar Dhakal, PhD Student
  • Número de teléfono: 977 9851192356
  • Correo electrónico: liladhar.dhakal@ph.au.dk

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Bagmati
      • Bharatpur, Bagmati, Nepal
        • Schools

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion criteria:

  • Students enrolled in grades 6-10 in the participating schools
  • Students whose parent or guardian provides written informed consent
  • Students who provides written informed assent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Students who are not expected to participate in regular classroom activities

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: CROSS-MIND Intervention

CROSS-MIND is an eight-week, teacher-facilitated school-based mental well-being intervention. Students participate in one approximately 90-minute storytelling circle session each week. Sessions use structured storytelling, reflection, creative expression, group discussion, and peer-reflection activities.

Major intervention areas include establishing a safe and supportive group environment; identifying and exploring common adolescent challenges; using narrative externalisation to separate problems from personal identity; reflecting on life experiences, strengths, and aspirations through Life River activities; identifying coping skills and supportive relationships; and consolidating learning through reflective writing, poetry or letter-writing and a closing celebration.

CROSS-MIND is an eight-week, teacher-facilitated school-based mental well-being intervention. Students participate in one approximately 90-minute storytelling circle session each week. Sessions use structured storytelling, reflection, creative expression, group discussion, and peer-reflection activities.

Major intervention areas include establishing a safe and supportive group environment; identifying and exploring common adolescent challenges; using narrative externalisation to separate problems from personal identity; reflecting on life experiences, strengths, and aspirations through Life River activities; identifying coping skills and supportive relationships; and consolidating learning through reflective writing, poetry or letter-writing and a closing celebration.

Sin intervención: Regular School Activities
Students assigned to the control group will continue with their usual school activities and will not receive the CROSS-MIND intervention during the study period.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change from baseline in the mean mental well-being score after the intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
The primary outcome, mental well-being, will be measured using Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale. It uses a five-point Likert response scale and has a total score range of 14-70, with higher scores indicating better mental well-being.
Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change from baseline in the mean Self-Esteem score after the intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Self-esteem will be measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. It uses a four-point Likert response scale and has a total score range of 0-30, with higher scores indicating better outcome i.e. higher self-esteem.
Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Change from baseline in the mean depressive symptoms score after the intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire -adolescent version. It uses a four-point response scale and has a total score range of 0-27, with higher scores indicating worse outcome i.e., depressive symptoms.
Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Change from baseline in the mean anxiety symptoms score after the intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Anxiety symptoms will be measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 adolescent version. It uses a four-point Likert response scale and has a total score range of 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse outcome i.e., higher anxiety symptoms.
Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Change from baseline in the mean difficulty score after the intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Total difficulty will be measured using the Strength and Difficulty Questionnaire adolescent self-administration version. It uses a three-point response scale and has a total score range of 0-40, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes, i.e., greater difficulty.
Baseline before intervention and endline within a week of intervention completion
Acceptability of CROSS-MIND
Periodo de tiempo: At endline, within a week of the completion of the delivery of the last session, i.e., the 8th session of the intervention
Acceptability will be assessed using the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with total scores ranging from 4 to 20; higher scores indicate greater acceptability. The measure will be completed by teachers who delivered CROSS-MIND sessions and students who participated in the sessions.
At endline, within a week of the completion of the delivery of the last session, i.e., the 8th session of the intervention
Feasibility of delivering CROSS-MIND from the perspective of intervention-delivering teachers
Periodo de tiempo: At endline, within a week of the completion of the delivery of the last session, i.e., the 8th session of the intervention
Feasibility will be assessed using the 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with total scores ranging from 4 to 20; higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility. The measure will be completed by teachers who delivered CROSS-MIND sessions.
At endline, within a week of the completion of the delivery of the last session, i.e., the 8th session of the intervention
Perceived appropriateness of CROSS-MIND
Periodo de tiempo: At endline, within a week of the completion of the delivery of the last session, i.e., the 8th session of the intervention
Appropriateness will be assessed using the 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with total scores ranging from 4 to 20; higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness. The measure will be completed by teachers who delivered CROSS-MIND sessions and students who participates in the sessions.
At endline, within a week of the completion of the delivery of the last session, i.e., the 8th session of the intervention
Fidelity of CROSS-MIND intervention delivery
Periodo de tiempo: Throughout the 8-week intervention period
Fidelity will be assessed throughout the intervention using session delivery records and monitoring of intervention sessions. Assessment will include adherence to the planned intervention components, intervention dose (sessions delivered) and quality of delivery.
Throughout the 8-week intervention period

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Per Kallestrup, PhD, University of Aarhus
  • Investigador principal: Liladhar Dhakal, University of Aarhus

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de noviembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de septiembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

10 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 330_2026_CROSS-MIND_Nepal_AU

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported study outcomes, including baseline and endline demographic characteristics, intervention group allocation, primary and secondary outcome measures, and implementation outcome measures, will be shared.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning 3 months after publication with no end date

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

De-identified IPD and supporting information will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the principal investigator and relevant institutional/ethical requirements. Access will be limited to data necessary for the approved research purpose. Requests will be submitted to the principal investigator, and data will be provided through a secure data-sharing mechanism following appropriate data-use and confidentiality agreements.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CIF
  • CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir