Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

SPECTRA: Intraoperative Hyperspectral Imaging for Prostate Cancer (SPECTRA)

14 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Massimo Valerio

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is currently one of the gold standard of care in managing localized prostate cancer (Pca). However, despite advances in Robot-Assisted RP (RARP), cancer cells may still be found (up to 42%) at the edge of the removed prostate specimen, commonly referred as Positive Surgical Margins (PSM). PSM are well-known risk factors of adverse oncological outcomes (biochemical recurrence).

It is therefore essential to characterize intraoperatively the tumor extent. In RARP, the leading intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) technique, NeuroSAFE is based on Intra-operative frozen section (IFS) of both prostate lateral sides sampled at 3-5 mm intervals. However, despite proven oncological benefit, adoption is still limited to expert centers due to a prolonged operative time, loss of integrity of the surgical specimen for definitive histopathological analysis, omission of regions (apex, base), and logistical complexity (trained uropathologist, cryostat…).

With this prospective single-center project, we wish to explore the use of non-invasive optical imaging technology, HyperSpectral Imaging (HSI), as a reliable alternative for examination of the ex-vivo prostate specimen to

  1. Distinguish normal versus tumor tissue at the surgical margin in fresh specimen.
  2. Quantify whether HSI can be integrated into the intraoperative workflow (feasibility), thus, image acquisition time and inference time should then be evaluated.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Prostate cancer (Pca) is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in men worldwide with over 1.5 million new cases annually and a median age at diagnosis of 66 years. Despite the natural history being slow and clinically insignificant in most cases, its heterogeneity and high prevalence mean it remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Treatment options depend on cancer stage, risk stratification and patient preferences.

Radical prostatectomy (RP), which consists of the surgical removal of the prostate and the seminal vesicles, is one of the gold-standard curative treatment for localized diseases. RP techniques include open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgery. Despite recent advances in the robotic field, positive surgical margins (PSM) can occur up to 42 %. According to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), PSM is defined by tumor cells reaching the inked surgical margin of the prostatectomy specimen. PSM significantly reduces progression-free survival and is a known prognostic parameter for postoperative biochemical recurrence (BCR).

Current margin assessment relies on Intraoperative Frozen Section (IFS), the current gold-standard technique is the Neurovascular Structure-Adjacent Frozen-Section Examination (NeuroSAFE). It consists of an IFS analysis of tissue adjacent to neurovascular bundles. While this neurovascular structure sparing method improves postoperative erectile function and reduces PSM, its implementation is limited due to additional operating time (45-60 minutes), increased resource demands on pathology departments, and the inability to provide a whole specimen analysis.

Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) combines conventional imaging (camera) with a spectrometer, providing both spatial and spectral information of the analyzed structures, enabling tissue differentiation based on structural properties. HSI uses reflectance spectroscopic imaging measurements, which involve a white light irradiation of the tissue and subsequently a recording of the remitted spectral intensities. The interaction between the incident light and the tissue modifies the light's spectral distribution with the reflected light containing information about the tissue composition. This technology has already been successfully applied in visceral surgery to quantify liver viability during ischemic and reperfusion phases. More recently, in Urology, HSI was successfully used as a predictive tool for early postoperative kidney graft.

Another clinical application of HSI is the ability to discriminate between normal and cancerous tissue as observed in gastric, head and neck (H&N), colorectal, brain and breast cancers. Similarly, in 2024, spectral data from Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS) showed promising results achieving an average sensitivity of 89% with a specificity of 82%, in 59 prostatectomy specimens, confirming the potential of spectroscopy. However, DRS approach comes with limitations, more particularly in spatial orientation because it requires multiple point-based measurements across the prostate surface with the inability to evaluate the entire tissue volume. In contrast, HSI provides spatially resolved spectral data across the entire field of view, enabling comprehensive tissue mapping. In 2012, the feasibility of HSI for PCa detection was evaluated in in-vivo mice and in pathological tissue slides, achieving 93% sensitivity and 97% specificity using a support vector machine algorithm and providing an estimated AUC-ROC of 0.9485. In this context, HSI provides a unique opportunity to assess fully a specimen. However, its application for real-time margin assessment during surgery remains unexplored. Recently, a 3D pipeline that co-registers multi-angle ex-vivo HSI with volumetric histopathology was implemented, enabling voxel-wise tumor segmentation and AR visualization in H&N specimens using convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

This project aims to validate HSI feasibility in ex-vivo prostate specimens. By providing a non-invasive and contactless evaluation in the operating theatre, HSI could reduce PSM rates, minimizing adjuvant radiotherapy needs and overall, improve long-term oncological outcomes.

In this research project, the TIVITA® Tissue system, a CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) Push-broom Scanning Hyperspectral Camera device, designed for real-time tissue assessment, will be employed. This CE (Conformité Européenne) certified device can provide 640x480 pixel images with a spectral range of 500 to 1000 nm and a spectral resolution of 5nm. The illumination system consists in six 20 W halogen spotlights (OSRAM GmbH, Munich, Germany). Each measurement takes approximately 7 seconds with a measured area up to 20-30 cm (wide enough for a whole prostate specimen).

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

26

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Vincent Benard, Resident
  • Número de teléfono: + 41 79 553 62 68
  • Correo electrónico: vincent.benard@hug.ch

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Canton of Geneva
      • Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Suiza, 1205
        • Reclutamiento
        • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève - Dept de Chirurgie - Service d'Urologie
        • Contacto:
          • Vincent Benard, Resident
          • Número de teléfono: + 41 79 553 62 68
          • Correo electrónico: vincent.benard@hug.ch
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Massimo Valerio, Prof Dr med
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Jean-Christophe Tille, MD
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Oliver Windisch, MD
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Michele Diana, Prof Dr med
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Doron Merkler, Prof Dr med
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Mario Kreutzfeldt, MD
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Andrew Janawczyk, Prof Dr med
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Vincent Benard, Resident
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Christian Lovis, Prof Dr med
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Mina Bjelogrlic, PhD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological diagnosis (biopsy) of Pca
  • Prostate volume < 100 cm3 (measured on preoperative MRI) for a smooth acquisition with the hyperspectral device
  • Capable of forming his own views

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to participate.
  • Inability to follow study procedures, for example due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Participants with prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy. HyperSpectral imaging.

One visit related to the research protocol which consists in the information consultation during which the participant receives detailed oral and written information.

RAPR (day 0) is performed according to standard practice and is not part of the research-specific procedure.

The study is then based solely on ex-vivo analysis.

The study specific specimen handling consists in a multi-Angle HSI Image Acquisition before routine pathology. To enhance the co-registration between the two modalities, a black-ink may be applied on the ex-vivo specimen based on a MRI suspicious region of extra-prostatic extension (EPE Grade ≥ 2).

This procedure follows prior robust registration work between ex-vivo HSI and histology evaluation. The identification of this region will rely on the standard pre-operative MRI review already performed as part of routine care within our prostate cancer center before each radical prostatectomy.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Tumor extent
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Dice similarity coefficient between HSI-derived and histopathology spatial overlap between the HSI tumor map and co-registered histopathology
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Boundary delineation
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Normalized surface distance between HSI-derived andhistopathological tumor contours. Contour agreement
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Region overlap
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Jaccard index between HSI-derived and histopathological tumor masks intersection over union
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Foreground discrimination
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Pixel-wise sensitivity of HSI for tumor classification. Proportion of histologically tumor-positive pixels classified as tumor
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Background discrimination
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Pixel-wise specificity of HSI for tumor classification . Proportion of histologically non-tumor pixels classified as non-tumor
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Overall agreement:
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Pixel-wise accuracy of HSI for tumor classification. Proportion of evaluated pixels correctly classified, histopathology as reference
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Clinical workflow
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery)
HSI acquisition time
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery)
Computational runtime
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery)
Mean model inference time per hyperspectral image
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery)

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Surgical margins
Periodo de tiempo: HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7
Diagnostic accuracy of HSI for detection of histologically positive margins
HSI acquisition on Day 0 (day of surgery); reference histopathological assessment on postoperative Days 7

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Massimo Valerio, HUG

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de agosto de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

31 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de septiembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

17 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

17 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Exploratory study with a small number of participants.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir