Influenza Diagnosis, Treatment and Surveillance With Xpert Flu
The purpose of this study is to:
- Evaluate the clinical performance of a newly available highly-sensitive rapid influenza test, Xpert Flu.
- Derive and validate an adult clinical decision guideline to guide clinical testing of influenza patients who meed CDC criteria for antiviral treatment.
- Evaluate impact of rapid influenza testing for antiviral treatment.
- Determine cost effectiveness of influenza testing and treatment strategies.
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus
Four strategically selected medical centers across the US (representing the West Coast, Southwest, Midwest; and East Coast) will enroll adult subjects presenting to the ED with an acute respiratory illness who fulfill CDC recommended criteria for receiving antiviral therapy. At each of the 4 sites, dedicated research coordinators will approach all adult (age > 18 years old) ED patients with broadly defined respiratory related complaints and screen for those who meet CDC recommended criteria for antiviral therapy (i.e. those at 'high-risk for complications' or those with 'potential influenza-related complications).
Consenting subjects will have a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab collected for both Xpert Flu testing and gold standard reverse transcription-PCR (rt-PCR) testing under a research protocol. The investigators will compare the test results from the rapid flu testing to that of the gold standard rt-PCR testing in order to assess the clinical performance characteristics of the new rapid test (Objective 1). The investigators will also collect demographics and medical historical information using a brief structured data form, which will be used in combination with rt-PCR test results to derive and validate a clinical decision guideline (Objective 2).
The investigators will simultaneously randomize 2 of the 4 hospitals to the Rapid Testing Group (which will have systematic rapid flu testing performed with results provided to the clinicians), or the Control Group (which will follow standard of care practice with testing left to the discretion of individual clinicians). This will permit comparison of rates of ED antiviral administration or prescription between the two groups to assess the clinical impact of influenza testing (Objective 3). Finally, cost data from the ED visits and subsequent hospitalization will be collected from subjects in both the rapid testing group and the control group to inform a cost-utility analysis of rapid influenza testing compared to current standard of care (Objective 4).
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)
Vaihe
- Ei sovellettavissa
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, Yhdysvallat, 85008
- Maricopa Medical Center
-
-
California
-
Sylmar, California, Yhdysvallat, 91342
- Olive View - UCLA Medical Center
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Yhdysvallat, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, Yhdysvallat, 64108
- Truman Medical Center
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older
- Acute respiratory tract infection, i.e. in the past two days the subject has experienced any of the following symptoms: new or increased cough, new or increased shortness of breath, change in sputum production (for adults 65 years or older), new sinus pain, new nasal congestion/rhinorrhea, new sore throat, new fever, triage temperature greater than or equal to 38F
- CDC Criteria for influenza antiviral treatment, i.e. is the subject at risk for influenza complications or does the subject have potential current influenza complications including: 65 years old or older, pregnant (or less than 2 weeks post-partum), American Indian or Alaska Native, morbid obesity (BMI greater than 40), current resident of a chronic care facility, chronic pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease (except isolated hypertension), renal disease, hepatic disease, hematologic disease, metabolic disease, neurologic disease, immunosupression due to [HIV or AIDS, transplant, chemotherapy, medications, other - specify]. OR does the subject have potential current influenza complications such as: admitted to the hospital or a diagnosis of pneumonia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to speak or understand English or Spanish
- Unable to provide consent
- Lack of follow up information (i.e. working telephone number)
- Have an influenza diagnosis in the past 2 weeks (i.e. either given antivirals or had a confirmatory influenza test)
- Previously enrolled in this study
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Diagnostiikka
- Jako: Satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
- Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Ei väliintuloa: Control Arm
Participants in this arm will receive usual care (influenza testing and treatment)
|
|
|
Kokeellinen: Rapid Testing
Participants in this arm will receive rapid influenza testing with Xpert Flu.
|
Participants with recieve rapid influenza testing with Xpert Flu
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical performance of Xpert Flu
Aikaikkuna: one year
|
The primary outcome is the sensitivity and specificity of Cepheid Xpert Flu in detecting Influenza, as well as the positive and negative predictive value.
|
one year
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical decision guideline
Aikaikkuna: one year
|
Using rt-PCR as the gold standard for influenza testing, we will initially evaluate signs and symptoms (such as cough, fever, sore throat, shortness of breath, etc.) for their sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio for diagnosing influenza.
|
one year
|
|
Clinical Utility of Xpert Flu
Aikaikkuna: one year
|
Clinical utility is defined here as the proportion of high-risk subjects with confirmed influenza receiving antiviral or antiviral prescriptions in the ED in the Rapid Testing Group compared to the Control Group.
|
one year
|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Aikaikkuna: one year
|
We will perform a cost-utility analysis from the societal perspective comparing the following 4 treatment strategies: 1) treat all; 2) treat none; 3) treat based on clinical judgment; 4) treat based on Xpert Flu.
|
one year
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Sponsori
Yhteistyökumppanit
Tutkijat
- Päätutkija: Andrea Dugas, MD, Johns Hopkins University
- Päätutkija: Richard Rothman, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)
Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Arvio)
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- 6 IDSEP130014-01-01
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .