- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01947049
Influenza Diagnosis, Treatment and Surveillance With Xpert Flu
The purpose of this study is to:
- Evaluate the clinical performance of a newly available highly-sensitive rapid influenza test, Xpert Flu.
- Derive and validate an adult clinical decision guideline to guide clinical testing of influenza patients who meed CDC criteria for antiviral treatment.
- Evaluate impact of rapid influenza testing for antiviral treatment.
- Determine cost effectiveness of influenza testing and treatment strategies.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Four strategically selected medical centers across the US (representing the West Coast, Southwest, Midwest; and East Coast) will enroll adult subjects presenting to the ED with an acute respiratory illness who fulfill CDC recommended criteria for receiving antiviral therapy. At each of the 4 sites, dedicated research coordinators will approach all adult (age > 18 years old) ED patients with broadly defined respiratory related complaints and screen for those who meet CDC recommended criteria for antiviral therapy (i.e. those at 'high-risk for complications' or those with 'potential influenza-related complications).
Consenting subjects will have a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab collected for both Xpert Flu testing and gold standard reverse transcription-PCR (rt-PCR) testing under a research protocol. The investigators will compare the test results from the rapid flu testing to that of the gold standard rt-PCR testing in order to assess the clinical performance characteristics of the new rapid test (Objective 1). The investigators will also collect demographics and medical historical information using a brief structured data form, which will be used in combination with rt-PCR test results to derive and validate a clinical decision guideline (Objective 2).
The investigators will simultaneously randomize 2 of the 4 hospitals to the Rapid Testing Group (which will have systematic rapid flu testing performed with results provided to the clinicians), or the Control Group (which will follow standard of care practice with testing left to the discretion of individual clinicians). This will permit comparison of rates of ED antiviral administration or prescription between the two groups to assess the clinical impact of influenza testing (Objective 3). Finally, cost data from the ED visits and subsequent hospitalization will be collected from subjects in both the rapid testing group and the control group to inform a cost-utility analysis of rapid influenza testing compared to current standard of care (Objective 4).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85008
- Maricopa Medical Center
-
-
California
-
Sylmar, California, United States, 91342
- Olive View - UCLA Medical Center
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
- Truman Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older
- Acute respiratory tract infection, i.e. in the past two days the subject has experienced any of the following symptoms: new or increased cough, new or increased shortness of breath, change in sputum production (for adults 65 years or older), new sinus pain, new nasal congestion/rhinorrhea, new sore throat, new fever, triage temperature greater than or equal to 38F
- CDC Criteria for influenza antiviral treatment, i.e. is the subject at risk for influenza complications or does the subject have potential current influenza complications including: 65 years old or older, pregnant (or less than 2 weeks post-partum), American Indian or Alaska Native, morbid obesity (BMI greater than 40), current resident of a chronic care facility, chronic pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease (except isolated hypertension), renal disease, hepatic disease, hematologic disease, metabolic disease, neurologic disease, immunosupression due to [HIV or AIDS, transplant, chemotherapy, medications, other - specify]. OR does the subject have potential current influenza complications such as: admitted to the hospital or a diagnosis of pneumonia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to speak or understand English or Spanish
- Unable to provide consent
- Lack of follow up information (i.e. working telephone number)
- Have an influenza diagnosis in the past 2 weeks (i.e. either given antivirals or had a confirmatory influenza test)
- Previously enrolled in this study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control Arm
Participants in this arm will receive usual care (influenza testing and treatment)
|
|
|
Experimental: Rapid Testing
Participants in this arm will receive rapid influenza testing with Xpert Flu.
|
Participants with recieve rapid influenza testing with Xpert Flu
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical performance of Xpert Flu
Time Frame: one year
|
The primary outcome is the sensitivity and specificity of Cepheid Xpert Flu in detecting Influenza, as well as the positive and negative predictive value.
|
one year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical decision guideline
Time Frame: one year
|
Using rt-PCR as the gold standard for influenza testing, we will initially evaluate signs and symptoms (such as cough, fever, sore throat, shortness of breath, etc.) for their sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio for diagnosing influenza.
|
one year
|
|
Clinical Utility of Xpert Flu
Time Frame: one year
|
Clinical utility is defined here as the proportion of high-risk subjects with confirmed influenza receiving antiviral or antiviral prescriptions in the ED in the Rapid Testing Group compared to the Control Group.
|
one year
|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: one year
|
We will perform a cost-utility analysis from the societal perspective comparing the following 4 treatment strategies: 1) treat all; 2) treat none; 3) treat based on clinical judgment; 4) treat based on Xpert Flu.
|
one year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrea Dugas, MD, Johns Hopkins University
- Principal Investigator: Richard Rothman, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 6 IDSEP130014-01-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Influenza
-
Novartis VaccinesCompletedInfluenza | Seasonal Influenza | Human Influenza | Influenza Due to Unspecified Influenza VirusBelgium
-
Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and...CompletedInfluenza A | Influenza A Virus Infection | Influenza Epidemic | Influenza H5N1Russian Federation
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterHuman Vaccines ProjectCompletedVaccine Reaction | Influenza | Influenza, Human | Influenza A | Influenza Type B | Influenza A H3N2 | Influenza A H1N1United States
-
Canadian Immunization Research NetworkCHU de Quebec-Universite Laval; McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingAvian Influenza | H5N1 Virus | H5N1 Influenza | Avian Influenza A VirusCanada
-
NPO PetrovaxCompletedVaccine Reaction | Influenza | Influenza, Human | Influenza A | Acute Respiratory Infection | Influenza Type B | Flu | Influenza A H3N2 | Influenza A H1N1 | Flu, Human | Influenza EpidemicRussian Federation
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza Immunisation | Avian InfluenzaUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza | Influenza Immunisation | Avian InfluenzaUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...CompletedInfluenza Immunisation | Avian InfluenzaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Rapid Influenza Testing with Xpert Flu
-
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Vaccines and...CompletedInfluenza | Flu, HumanRussian Federation
-
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Vaccines and...Completed
-
Yale UniversityCompletedAlcohol Consumption | Sexual Risk BehaviorsUnited States
-
Fluart Innovative Vaccine Ltd, HungaryCompleted
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Public Health - Seattle and King...Completed
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingRespiratory Viral InfectionFrance
-
HIV Prevention Trials NetworkNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Division of...CompletedHIV Infection | Sexually Transmitted Infections | Pre-exposure Prophylaxis | Systems NavigationMalawi