- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT00516984
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Its Relationship to Autonomic Nervous System Activity
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Its Relationship to Autonomic Nervous System Activity as Demonstrated by Heart Rate Variability
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
For most osteopathic physicians the validation of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been largely observational and based on patient outcomes such as improvement in pain scales, range of motion, and other empiric measures.1,2 However, the osteopathic profession has long recognized a relationship between the autonomic nervous system and the function of the body in health and disease, although there is relatively little quantitative data evaluating the relationship between manipulation and the autonomic nervous system.3,4
A theoretical basis for the action of OMT and its effect in the body has been advanced based on autonomic activation causing concomitant vasodilatation, smooth muscle relaxation, and increased blood flow, resulting in improved range of motion, decrease in pain perception, or change in tissue. Until recently this association remained largely a theoretical consideration due to the inability to accurately measure autonomic activity directly. Over the past two decades indirect methods have been developed and refined to provide noninvasive markers of autonomic balance,5,6 with heart rate variability (HRV) being commonly used. HRV is based on the inherent variation of the R-to-R intervals of a standard electrocardiogram (ECG), with these variations largely due to changes in autonomic balance at the sinus node.6-8
Spectral analysis of heart rate variability has been used to study autonomic balance in humans, and it is generally accepted that the high frequency (HF) component (0.15-0.4 Hz) can be used as a marker for vagal modulation of heart rate. Although it is tempting to use the low frequency (LF) component (0.04-0.15 Hz) as a marker for sympathetic activity, its specificity is less clear. Pagani and colleagues9,10 have hypothesized that when the LF component is expressed in normalized units (LFnu) it becomes a better marker of sympathetic modulation of heart rate. For most studies using spectral analysis, the LF/HF ratio is used and considered by many to be a good index of sympathovagal balance.6,7,9,10
The confidence given to the LF/HF ratio accurately reflecting autonomic balance is significantly influenced by experimental design. A tilt protocol involving postural change from horizontal to upright can be used to calibrate the change in the LF/HF ratio which occurs between the two positions and thus set a physiological range for sympathetic and vagal modulation of heart rate. An experimental procedure then can be implemented where comparisons are made of the changes in the LF/HF ratios that occur when the body is shifted from the horizontal to the upright position under conditions with application of an intervention versus without the intervention. In this manner, an experimentally mediated change in LF/HF ratio (i.e., with intervention) can be calibrated against a physiologically relevant change in ratio (i.e., without intervention).
This approach was used by these investigators in a pilot study (n=9 healthy, adult volunteers, 3 females and 6 males) which showed that the LF/HF ratio changed from a mean of 1.75+1.40 (mean+SD) in the horizontal position to a mean of 6.00+1.20 in the 50-degree head-up position. This change reflects an increase in sympathetic tone. Mean heart rate in these subjects increased from 61+7 bpm to 78+2 bpm in the head-up position. The subjects then were treated in the 50-degree head-up position with an OMT procedure, cervical myofascial release, which is thought to increase vagal tone. After the procedure was applied, the LF/HF ratio decreased back down to 1.75+1.58, even though the subjects were still in the head-up position. These data support the initial hypothesis that specific OMT procedures can modulate vagal tone, and also provide information relating to the significance of the LF/HF change. That is, the application of OMT reversed the increase in the ratio that occurs in the 50-degree head-up position.
We conducted a continuation project to further examine the association between OMT and autonomic nervous system activity as demonstrated by HRV, studying the hypothesis that cervical myofascial release increased vagal tone. In a within subjects (repeated measures) design, we examined the effect of OMT on HRV in comparison with sham treatment (touch only) and control (no touch) conditions.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Tulsa, Oklahoma, États-Unis, 74107
- OSU
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
Twenty-eight (28) study subjects then were selected by their response to a general questionnaire, which indicated suitability for the study, and assessed by the following inclusion criteria:
- written informed consent
- normal healthy adults older than 19 years and younger than 50 years
- normal ECG
- normal blood pressure based on criteria published in the Seventh Report of the U.S. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exclusion criteria included chronic cardiovascular disease (heart failure, myocardial infarction, or hypertension)
- diabetes
- asthma
- pregnancy
- smoking
- premature ventricular contractions exceeding 20% of total heart beats
- resting supine heart rate greater than 75 bpm or less than 45 bpm, systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg or less than 90 mmHg
- failure of heart rate to increase with passive tilt (50-degrees head-up)
- Long-distance runners and other conditioned athletes also were excluded
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Non randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur placebo: Placebo
No-touch control condition applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
|
No-touch control condition applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
|
|
Comparateur factice: Sham
Touch-only sham treatment applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
|
Touch-only sham treatment applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
|
|
Comparateur actif: OMT
Cervical myofascial OMT applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
|
Cervical myofascial OMT applied while subject was at a 50-degree head-up tilt.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Normalized low frequency and high frequency components of HRV, including LF/HF ratio. Comparisons between measurements taken at a 50-degree tilt with those taken at pre- and post-intervention in the horizontal position.
Délai: Treatments administered in separate sessions at least 24 hours apart.
|
Treatments administered in separate sessions at least 24 hours apart.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Charles E. Henley, D.O., MPH, OUHSC
- Chercheur principal: Frances Wen, Ph.D., OUHSC
- Chercheur principal: Bruce Benjamin, Ph.D., OSU
- Chercheur principal: Douglas Ivins, M.D., OUHSC
- Chercheur principal: Miriam Mills, M.D., OSU
Publications et liens utiles
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimation)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- OUIRB 12024
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .