Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Motor Training for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Survivors

30 mars 2017 mis à jour par: Paolo Bonato, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Functional Task Training on Motor Recovery in Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and functional upper extremity task training to functional upper extremity task training alone. The functional upper extremity task training uses the Armeo Spring robotic arm to support the limb while playing functional task games on a computer.

Specific Aims:

  1. To demonstrate that tDCS combined with upper extremity functional task training in a virtual environment is more effective than functional task training in a virtual environment with sham tDCS.
  2. To compare cortico-excitatory changes following training with tDCS vs. sham stimulation, using paired- and single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation as a tool to measure cortical excitability.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This is a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study comparing sham and continuous tDCS combined with repetitive upper extremity functional task training in a virtual environment. Subjects will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups: Armeo training with continuous tDCS, or sham tDCS through a randomization stratification approach. Subjects will be grouped into strata defined by the degree of weakness, and then randomized separately within each stratum according to a block randomization of 6 to receive Armeo training-continuous tDCS, or Armeo training-sham stimulation. Each subject will receive 10 training sessions over 2 weeks. Training sessions will last for 40 minutes and will focus on repetitive tasks using the Armeo device that incorporate multidirectional reaching, grasp and release action of the hand. We will use a variety of virtual tasks (computer games) in the training. Examples of the virtual tasks include 1) picking up objects from shelves placed against different walls of a room and placing them in a bin in the center foreground of the screen, 2) picking up eggs from a basket and cracking them over a frying pan, 3) picking up objects at a virtual supermarket and placing them in the shopping cart, 4) cleaning a stove top. In between training sessions, subjects will be encouraged to use the affected arm in daily activities. This will be assessed with the Motor Activity Log.

tDCS will be delivered by positioning the anode over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the affected hemisphere, while the cathode will be placed over the unaffected M1 area. The electrode localization method will be according to the International 10-20 Electrode Placement System for placement of EEG electrodes. This method has been validated with a frameless stereotactic system. Direct current will be transferred by a saline-soaked pair of surface sponge electrode (35cm2) and delivered by a battery-driven, constant current stimulator with a maximum output of 10mA. An intensity of 1mA will be used in this study (current density of 0.04 μA/cm2). Continuous stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 1mA while the subject undergoes the 40-minute Armeo motor training sessions. For sham stimulation, the same parameters will be employed. However, the current will be applied for 30 seconds only. Current intensity will be gradually increased and decreased to diminish its perception.

Outcome measures will be performed prior to treatment initiation, at day 5, 10, and at follow-up week 1, 2 and 4 after the end of treatment. A rater blinded to the treatment will assess the effects of the intervention using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test and Box and Block Test.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

2

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02129
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 70 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-70 years
  • First-time moderate to severe TBI
  • Arm weakness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of seizures
  • Major depression
  • Agitated Behavior Scale >21
  • Cognitive Impairment that interferes with understanding instructions
  • Pregnancy
  • Implants (e.g. metal plates, shunts, pacemaker)
  • Participation in other upper extremity rehab or TBI study

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Armeo training with continuous tDCS
Subjects will receive 10 sessions of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)/Armeo training over 2 weeks. Training sessions will last for 40 minutes and will focus on repetitive tasks using the Armeo device that. To deliver the stimulation, the anode will be placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the affected hemisphere, while the cathode will be placed over the unaffected M1 area. Direct current will be transferred by a saline-soaked pair of surface sponge electrode (35cm2). Continuous stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 1mA while the subject undergoes the 40-minute Armeo motor training sessions.
Continuous mild transcranial direct current stimulation will be used while the participant plays video games using the Armeo Spring Robot to support the affected arm. Intervention: 40 minute training sessions, 5 days a week for 2 weeks.
Autres noms:
  • Device name: Phoresor II Auto
  • Produced by: Iomed
Upper extremity training with the use of a weight support device and virtual reality.
Autres noms:
  • Réalisé par : Hocoma
  • Device: Armeo
Comparateur factice: Armeo training with sham tDCS
Subjects will receive the same number of 40-minute training sessions (i.e. 10 sessions) as the subjects in the experimental group. Training will take place over a period of two weeks as per the experimental group. Also, electrodes will be positioned on the scalp as per the experimental group. However, for sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), the current will be delivered for only 30 seconds. The current intensity will be gradually increased and decreased to diminish its perception.
Upper extremity training with the use of a weight support device and virtual reality.
Autres noms:
  • Réalisé par : Hocoma
  • Device: Armeo
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation will be used while the participant focuses on repetitive tasks using the Armeo device that incorporate multidirectional reaching, grasp and release action of the hand of the affected arm. Intervention: 40 minute training sessions, 5 days a week for 2 weeks.
Autres noms:
  • Device name: Phoresor II Auto
  • Produced by: Iomed

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test Score From Baseline
Délai: Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test is a functional test consisting of 7 subtests. Each subtest requires that the subject performs a motor task (e.g. using one hand to pick up a small object positioned on a table in front of the subject). The test score is derived by measuring (using a stopwatch) the time in sec that the subject needs to complete the task. Individuals with no motor impairments typically need between 30 and 60 sec to complete the 7 subtests of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.
Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post
Change in Box and Block Test Score From Baseline
Délai: Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post
The Box and Block Test is a functional test. Subjects are instructed to move small blocks from one box to a second box. The test measures the number of blocks that subjects can move during a period of 60 sec. The measurement unit for this task is the "number of blocks". Subjects with no motor impairments would typically move about 60 to 80 blocks in a period of 60 sec.
Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 juillet 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 septembre 2013

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 septembre 2013

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

6 décembre 2011

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

12 décembre 2012

Première publication (Estimation)

17 décembre 2012

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

4 mai 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 mars 2017

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2017

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner