Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Motor Training for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Survivors

30 de marzo de 2017 actualizado por: Paolo Bonato, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Functional Task Training on Motor Recovery in Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and functional upper extremity task training to functional upper extremity task training alone. The functional upper extremity task training uses the Armeo Spring robotic arm to support the limb while playing functional task games on a computer.

Specific Aims:

  1. To demonstrate that tDCS combined with upper extremity functional task training in a virtual environment is more effective than functional task training in a virtual environment with sham tDCS.
  2. To compare cortico-excitatory changes following training with tDCS vs. sham stimulation, using paired- and single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation as a tool to measure cortical excitability.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This is a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study comparing sham and continuous tDCS combined with repetitive upper extremity functional task training in a virtual environment. Subjects will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups: Armeo training with continuous tDCS, or sham tDCS through a randomization stratification approach. Subjects will be grouped into strata defined by the degree of weakness, and then randomized separately within each stratum according to a block randomization of 6 to receive Armeo training-continuous tDCS, or Armeo training-sham stimulation. Each subject will receive 10 training sessions over 2 weeks. Training sessions will last for 40 minutes and will focus on repetitive tasks using the Armeo device that incorporate multidirectional reaching, grasp and release action of the hand. We will use a variety of virtual tasks (computer games) in the training. Examples of the virtual tasks include 1) picking up objects from shelves placed against different walls of a room and placing them in a bin in the center foreground of the screen, 2) picking up eggs from a basket and cracking them over a frying pan, 3) picking up objects at a virtual supermarket and placing them in the shopping cart, 4) cleaning a stove top. In between training sessions, subjects will be encouraged to use the affected arm in daily activities. This will be assessed with the Motor Activity Log.

tDCS will be delivered by positioning the anode over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the affected hemisphere, while the cathode will be placed over the unaffected M1 area. The electrode localization method will be according to the International 10-20 Electrode Placement System for placement of EEG electrodes. This method has been validated with a frameless stereotactic system. Direct current will be transferred by a saline-soaked pair of surface sponge electrode (35cm2) and delivered by a battery-driven, constant current stimulator with a maximum output of 10mA. An intensity of 1mA will be used in this study (current density of 0.04 μA/cm2). Continuous stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 1mA while the subject undergoes the 40-minute Armeo motor training sessions. For sham stimulation, the same parameters will be employed. However, the current will be applied for 30 seconds only. Current intensity will be gradually increased and decreased to diminish its perception.

Outcome measures will be performed prior to treatment initiation, at day 5, 10, and at follow-up week 1, 2 and 4 after the end of treatment. A rater blinded to the treatment will assess the effects of the intervention using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test and Box and Block Test.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

2

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02129
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 70 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-70 years
  • First-time moderate to severe TBI
  • Arm weakness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of seizures
  • Major depression
  • Agitated Behavior Scale >21
  • Cognitive Impairment that interferes with understanding instructions
  • Pregnancy
  • Implants (e.g. metal plates, shunts, pacemaker)
  • Participation in other upper extremity rehab or TBI study

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Armeo training with continuous tDCS
Subjects will receive 10 sessions of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)/Armeo training over 2 weeks. Training sessions will last for 40 minutes and will focus on repetitive tasks using the Armeo device that. To deliver the stimulation, the anode will be placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the affected hemisphere, while the cathode will be placed over the unaffected M1 area. Direct current will be transferred by a saline-soaked pair of surface sponge electrode (35cm2). Continuous stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 1mA while the subject undergoes the 40-minute Armeo motor training sessions.
Continuous mild transcranial direct current stimulation will be used while the participant plays video games using the Armeo Spring Robot to support the affected arm. Intervention: 40 minute training sessions, 5 days a week for 2 weeks.
Otros nombres:
  • Device name: Phoresor II Auto
  • Produced by: Iomed
Upper extremity training with the use of a weight support device and virtual reality.
Otros nombres:
  • Producida por: Hocoma
  • Device: Armeo
Comparador falso: Armeo training with sham tDCS
Subjects will receive the same number of 40-minute training sessions (i.e. 10 sessions) as the subjects in the experimental group. Training will take place over a period of two weeks as per the experimental group. Also, electrodes will be positioned on the scalp as per the experimental group. However, for sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), the current will be delivered for only 30 seconds. The current intensity will be gradually increased and decreased to diminish its perception.
Upper extremity training with the use of a weight support device and virtual reality.
Otros nombres:
  • Producida por: Hocoma
  • Device: Armeo
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation will be used while the participant focuses on repetitive tasks using the Armeo device that incorporate multidirectional reaching, grasp and release action of the hand of the affected arm. Intervention: 40 minute training sessions, 5 days a week for 2 weeks.
Otros nombres:
  • Device name: Phoresor II Auto
  • Produced by: Iomed

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test Score From Baseline
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test is a functional test consisting of 7 subtests. Each subtest requires that the subject performs a motor task (e.g. using one hand to pick up a small object positioned on a table in front of the subject). The test score is derived by measuring (using a stopwatch) the time in sec that the subject needs to complete the task. Individuals with no motor impairments typically need between 30 and 60 sec to complete the 7 subtests of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test.
Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post
Change in Box and Block Test Score From Baseline
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post
The Box and Block Test is a functional test. Subjects are instructed to move small blocks from one box to a second box. The test measures the number of blocks that subjects can move during a period of 60 sec. The measurement unit for this task is the "number of blocks". Subjects with no motor impairments would typically move about 60 to 80 blocks in a period of 60 sec.
Baseline, Day 5 (midpoint), Day 10 (endpoint), 1 wk post, 2 wks post, 4 wks post

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de julio de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2013

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2013

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

6 de diciembre de 2011

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de diciembre de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

17 de diciembre de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de mayo de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de marzo de 2017

Última verificación

1 de marzo de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir