Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Mobile Health Solutions for Behavioral Skill Implementation Through Homework (MHealth)

27 février 2020 mis à jour par: Mary M. McKay, NYU Silver School of Social Work

The goal of this two-year R34 treatment development grant is to develop a mobile health (mHealth) application that will both advance theory in and clinical practice of homework (HW) implementation.

HW can be described as between-session exercises where the client practices specific skills learned within-session in order to promote skill acquisition, which ultimately leads to improved acute- as well as longer-term therapeutic benefits on targeted outcomes, generalization of treatment effects and maintenance of treatment gains. Despite data demonstrating that HW is critical to achieving maximal benefits from evidence-based treatments, very little theory-driven approaches have been conducted focusing on improving the HW process. Through utilizing self-determination theory as a guiding framework and integrating principles from the field of "gamification" and goal-setting, the aim is to develop a two-component mHealth HW application (My MFG).

The first component focuses on delivering HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process of HW. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

The process of the development of My MFG will be guided by the clinic and community development model and iterative software development process to maximize the feasibility and sustainability of My MFG within practice settings often characterized by limited resources. Findings from this study have broad implications for evidence-based treatments for youth and adult mental health disorders that emphasize HW as the link between treatment and improvements in targeted outcomes.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The aim of the proposed study is to develop a theory-informed mobile health (mHealth) application for urban caregivers attempting to improve their children's oppositional and conduct related difficulties (i.e., disruptive behavior disorders; DBDs). The majority of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) targeting youth DBDs emphasize change in specific parenting/family-level processes empirically linked to the maintenance of DBDs. Existing EBTs frequently include at-home-practice-exercises (i.e., homework; HW) to reinforce parent skill acquisition and maximize use of new skills with children at home. Poor quantity and quality of HW completed by parents significantly attenuates the effect of EBTs. This is a significant limiting-factor in many EBTs attaining full public health impact. Given the robust effect of HW on outcomes from EBTs across a range of behavioral health difficulties and populations, there is a call for moving beyond the question of whether HW is important to questions such as what processes are involved in HW implementation and how best to support these processes. Minimal investigation has been focused on these critical questions.

A model of HW has recently been proposed to better understand the process of HW implementation, as well as guide critically needed supports for at-home practice exercises.

This model proposes four HW processes:

  1. Designing;
  2. Assigning;
  3. Doing, and;
  4. Reviewing.

The DADR model proposes that specific social, cognitive and behavioral factors related to the HW task, as well as to the provider and the adult caregiver may affect the quality of each phase and ultimately to the quantity and quality of HW completed. Methods to better understand, support, and impact these processes are essential to advancing theory and offering solutions to HW completion.

Through features available on smartphones (e.g., camera/video/voice recording; simple message service; internet-access; global positioning system), there are novel methods to interface with and support clients outside of defined treatment sessions. Through the use of these features, mHealth applications can be used to engage, educate, connect, track, and remind clients. These applications can use push (send communications) or pull (client's access tools on their own) mechanisms to engage the client in behavioral change activity. mHealth applications that integrate push and pull methods offer a significant opportunity to enhance outcomes across a range of health and behavioral health challenges and populations.

The goal of this two-year R34 treatment development grant is in response to RFA-MH-13-061 (Harnessing advanced health technologies to drive mental health improvement) to develop a mHealth application that will both advance theory in and clinical practice guided by the DADR model of HW implementation. Specifically we aim to utilize mHealth to improve the "Design" and "Do" process of HW within the context of the Family Groups for Youth with Behavioral Difficulties (MFG) intervention, an EBT for DBDs in youth and their families who seek assistance at outpatient mental health clinics in urban communities. To date, efforts at utilizing mHealth within the context of HW have been minimal and have not taken a systematic, theory-driven approach, thereby limiting the advance of knowledge and clinical application. Through utilizing self-determination theory as a guiding framework and integrating principles from the field of "gamification" and goal-setting, the aim is to develop a two-component MFG mHealth HW application (My MFG). The first component focuses on delivering MFG HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

The process of the development of My MFG will be guided by the clinic and community development model and iterative software development process to maximize the feasibility and sustainability of My MFG within practice settings often characterized by limited resources. The specific aims of this project are to:

  1. Develop My MFG through an iterative process informed by the perspectives of key stakeholders
  2. Determine the impact of MFG plus My MFG relative to MFG-alone on the DADR process and HW quantity and quality. It is hypothesized that the MFG plus My MFG will result in:

    1. Greater quality of the "Design" and "Do" process rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders
    2. Greater quantity and quality of HW assignments rated by therapists and parents
    3. Greater quality of the "Review" process as rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders as a function of improved HW quantity and quality
    4. Greater satisfaction with treatment as rated by the parent, target child, and therapists NIMH has specifically called for acceleration of research to maximize the ability of current treatments to reduce symptoms, improve adherence and functioning while improving quality of and lowering the cost of care. The mHealth application and methods proposed herein serve as systematic, theory-driven approaches to significantly advance understanding of how best to support the HW process-a common element of many EBTs across various disorders and populations-ultimately resulting in greater effectiveness of EBTs, maintenance and generalization of behavioral skills learned during EBTs.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Anticipé)

96

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • New York
      • New York, New York, États-Unis, 10003
        • McSilver Institute for Poverty Policy and Research - New York University Silver School of Social Work

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

7 ans à 13 ans (Enfant)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

1) youth between the ages of 7 to 13 years and an accompanying adult primary caregiver available to participate in the research and intervention activities 2) English speaking youth and adult caregiver and 3) youth meeting criteria for DBD via parent reports based on the Disruptive Behavior Disorder (DBD) rating scales of DSM symptoms and cross-situational impairment as assessed through parent ratings on the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS). Children will be diagnosed with DBD if they meet DSM symptom criteria for DBD by parent report (i.e., at least four symptoms of ODD or 3 symptoms of CD), and impairment ratings indicate at least one impairment domain.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

Children will also be excluded if there is:

  • Evidence of psychosis
  • If the youth or adult caregiver presents with emergency psychiatric needs that require services beyond that which can be managed within an outpatient setting (e.g. hospitalization, specialized placement outside the home), active intervention by clinic and research staff to secure what is needed will be made
  • Children will not be excluded if they participate in other psychosocial or pharmacological interventions.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: MFG plus MyMFG

MFG plus MyMFG will be tested and the aim is:

  1. Greater quality of the "Design" and "Do" process rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders.
  2. Greater quantity and quality of HW assignments rated by therapists and parents.
  3. Greater quality of the "Review" process as rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders.
  4. Greater satisfaction with treatment as rated by the parent, target child, and therapists.

Specific aim is to utilize mHealth to improve the "Design" and "Do" process of HW within the context of the Family Groups for Youth with Behavioral Difficulties (MFG) intervention, an EBT for DBDs in youth and their families who seek assistance at outpatient mental health clinics in urban communities.

The first component focuses on delivering HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process of HW. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
DADR Process- HW quantity and quality, Homework Rating Scale-II
Délai: Weekly for 16 weeks; duration of group
This assessment helps to understand the DADR process and to assess if homework was completed and how much.
Weekly for 16 weeks; duration of group
DADR Proces- Homework Adherence and Competence Scales
Délai: Participants will be tracked up to 16 weeks and feedback will be collected every week.
An independent observer will assess level of homework adherence and competence in every session.
Participants will be tracked up to 16 weeks and feedback will be collected every week.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
DBD Symptoms -DBD Rating Scale
Délai: Day 1- 1st contact
To assess the severity of behavior problems.
Day 1- 1st contact
Children's Impairment Rating Scale
Délai: Day 1- 1st Contact
To assess level of behavioral impairment for child- caregiver reports.
Day 1- 1st Contact
Attendance
Délai: Weekly- duration of the 16 week group
Attendance will be measured for each participant at every session.
Weekly- duration of the 16 week group
IOWA Conners Oppositional/Defiant Scale
Délai: 1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
Caregiver assesses child's oppostitional and defiant behaviors at pre and post treatment.
1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
Consumer Satisfaction & Feedback- Treatment Attitude Inventory
Délai: 1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
This is a feedback assesment that will happen at either group or individual consultancy meeting to assess feedback of the MHealth process by parent, target child, and therapist.
1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Mary M McKay, PhD, New York University Silver School of Social Work
  • Directeur d'études: Tyrone M Parchment, LMSW, New York University Silver School of Social Work
  • Directeur d'études: Ozge Sensoy-Bahar, PhD, New York University Silver School of Social Work

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 novembre 2015

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mai 2016

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

18 juillet 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 août 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

7 août 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

2 mars 2020

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 février 2020

Dernière vérification

1 février 2020

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • R34MH100407-01 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner